29.06.2013 Views

Lecture 18: Baroque Rome - School of Architecture and Planning

Lecture 18: Baroque Rome - School of Architecture and Planning

Lecture 18: Baroque Rome - School of Architecture and Planning

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Lecture</strong> <strong>18</strong>: <strong>Baroque</strong> <strong>Rome</strong><br />

<strong>Baroque</strong> Form / <strong>Baroque</strong> Urbanism/<br />

Bernini <strong>and</strong> St Peters<br />

1580 1580– 1680


What is the <strong>Baroque</strong>?<br />

• The last <strong>of</strong> the great universal “styles” <strong>of</strong> European art / architecture – generally<br />

covering the timeframe <strong>of</strong> 1600‐1750 +/‐<br />

• After that, there are other movements, but more fragmentary, pluralistic – different<br />

competing trends, in the late <strong>18</strong>th century, through the 19th century – probably the next<br />

l “ i l” ld b M d i i h 20th truly “universal” movement, would be Modernism ‐‐ in the 20th century<br />

• But, also – really a continuation <strong>of</strong> the Renaissance, broadening the possibilities <strong>of</strong> the<br />

classical language in architecture – <strong>and</strong> importantly, in this time period, spreading this<br />

language throughout Europe; so that in the 17th language throughout Europe; so that in the 17 century classicism becomes as universal<br />

th century, classicism becomes as universal<br />

a language <strong>of</strong> building in Europe (w/ all <strong>of</strong> the different regional, stylistic variations) as<br />

did the Romanesque, <strong>and</strong> the Gothic before<br />

• Renaissance + <strong>Baroque</strong> = 350 years <strong>of</strong> development <strong>of</strong> the language <strong>of</strong> classical<br />

architecture<br />

• “<strong>Baroque</strong>” – (per critics) meant misshapen, odd, irregular (a term applied to a rough or<br />

imperfect p p pearl) ) – vs. clarity, y, order, , balance, , logic g etc. <strong>of</strong> “pure” p classicism ( (High g<br />

Renaissance)<br />

• Gothic = Structure<br />

• Renaissance = Composition p<br />

• <strong>Baroque</strong> = Space?


Further Clarification:<br />

• Develops out <strong>of</strong> 16 th century Mannerism<br />

• 1620 to 1680 +/‐ could be considered the “High <strong>Baroque</strong>”, though less important, (less<br />

clear) to distinguish between “Early” <strong>and</strong> “High” – as in looking at the Renaissance<br />

Political / cultural background: comes out <strong>of</strong>, <strong>and</strong> associated w/ the Counter Reformation<br />

<strong>of</strong> the Catholic Church:<br />

• 1517 – Martin Luther’s “Ninety‐Five Theses” nailed to church door, beginning <strong>of</strong><br />

Protestantism – as a challenge to Catholicism<br />

• 1545 – Council <strong>of</strong> Trent, Catholic church in response, instituting religious reforms<br />

• By the 17th century – Catholicism was resurgent, significant role in colonial Latin<br />

America, continued dominant role in southern Europe – <strong>Baroque</strong> became the “style” <strong>of</strong><br />

th the CCatholic th li world… ld<br />

• To make emphatic, to persuade – “the rhetoric <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Baroque</strong>” ‐‐ art, <strong>and</strong> architecture<br />

in the service <strong>of</strong> the church (<strong>and</strong> similarly to the French state, as we’ll see in lecture on<br />

“French Classicism”) – using the classical language w/ hyperbole, single‐mindedness,<br />

emphatically – the aim is to communicate…


Caravaggio’s<br />

work as<br />

representative<br />

<strong>of</strong> the new<br />

“<strong>Baroque</strong>” style:<br />

Compare to:<br />

Raphael’s “<strong>School</strong><br />

<strong>of</strong> Athens”<br />

(Renaissance) <strong>and</strong><br />

Rosso Fiorentino’s<br />

“Descent From the<br />

Cross”<br />

(Mannerism)<br />

• Chiaroscuro –<br />

composition based<br />

on dramatic,<br />

extreme light­dark g<br />

contrast<br />

• this is analogous<br />

to <strong>Baroque</strong><br />

architectural<br />

effects<br />

ff<br />

The Martyrdom <strong>of</strong> Saint Mathews, Mathews Caravaggio Caravaggio, 1599 1599­1600 1600<br />

Lemerle p11


Il Gesu – Facade:<br />

From Vignola’s design, revised by<br />

Giacomo della Porta ­­ “last” Mannerist<br />

masterpiece:<br />

• Flat, l thin h layering l<br />

• Double elements – rounded <strong>and</strong><br />

triangular pediments<br />

• ambiguity <strong>of</strong> layers – especially at the<br />

center bay<br />

• Like <strong>Baroque</strong> work (to follow) –<br />

emphasis on the center –build up <strong>of</strong><br />

details, layers emphasizing the central<br />

focal foca po point t<br />

Mannerism to <strong>Baroque</strong> –<br />

the Il Gesu Façade<br />

Il Gesu, Giacomo Barozzi da Vignola / Giacomo<br />

Example<br />

della Porta Porta, <strong>Rome</strong> (1568 (1568­1584) 1584)<br />

Fazio p3400


hrist photo<br />

S Gilch<br />

S Gilchrist G photo<br />

• Mannerist façade texture: thin/ overlapping layers…<br />

• Scroll motif – derived from Alberti’s Santa Maria Novella, Florence (1458­<br />

1470) –more than 100 years later this compositional approach to become<br />

h “ l ”fh 17th the “template” for the 17 C (S i ) B h h<br />

th Century (Seicento) <strong>Baroque</strong> church…<br />

S Gilchrist G photo


Il Gesu –Plan<br />

• Aisle­less nave – small side<br />

chapels p<br />

• domed crossing<br />

• w/ short transept arms,<br />

compact apse end –for<br />

preaching<br />

Letarrouilly<br />

plate 261<br />

Il Gesu –Interior: a template for the <strong>Baroque</strong> church<br />

• Based on: Alberti’s San Andrea, Mantua (barrel vaulted<br />

space, p , c1472), ), as original g “model” + High g Renaissance, ,<br />

Bramate­esque space (e.g. St Peters plan, as seen in<br />

Raphael’s painting, “The <strong>School</strong> <strong>of</strong> Athens”)<br />

• But –here meant to be viewed, taken in at a glance:<br />

emphasis on spatial unity <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong> barrel vaulted nave –short,<br />

wide, unrestricted view ffrom entry to focal f point at alter…<br />

Norberg‐Schulz p15


Il Gesu interior: compact<br />

transepts<br />

<strong>Baroque</strong> emphasis on:<br />

1) unity vs. parts 2) focus on dramatic visual “stage­set”<br />

Koneemann<br />

p205<br />

Il Gesu interior: nave terminates at<br />

domed crossing w/ simple “preaching”<br />

apse<br />

Historical note: as a Counter Reformation church, this elaborate decoration<br />

not original to Il Gesu, was added throughout the 17th not original to Il Gesu, was added throughout the 17 century <strong>and</strong> has<br />

characteristically elaborate, swirling “<strong>Baroque</strong>” feel<br />

Koneemann<br />

p204


Basic structure,<br />

layout similar to Il<br />

Gesu façade but…<br />

• More three­dimensional, fuller<br />

• Heavier, more monumental<br />

• Less ambiguous –bays clear, clear vertical<br />

emphasis, clear build up <strong>of</strong> interest towards the<br />

center –simpler composition<br />

• More forceful, direct?<br />

Th The First Fi t B<strong>Baroque</strong> FFaçade… d<br />

Norberrg‐Schulz<br />

p175<br />

Santa Susanna, Carlo Maderno<br />

(façade) <strong>Rome</strong> (1597­1603)<br />

Lemerle<br />

p55


Il Gesu, (1568­1584) Santa Susanna, (1597­1603)<br />

<strong>and</strong> compared: p Mannerist to <strong>Baroque</strong> q<br />

p340<br />

Fazio<br />

Lemerrle<br />

p55


Will look at: the “laboratory” <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rome</strong>, in the<br />

development <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Baroque</strong><br />

• The idea <strong>of</strong> the “gr<strong>and</strong> manner” – the planning <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rome</strong>,<br />

starting in earnest w/ Pope Sixtus V (served 1585‐1590)<br />

• The variety <strong>of</strong> <strong>Baroque</strong> church architecture in the 17th century <strong>Rome</strong> – the architectural “culture” <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rome</strong> ‐‐<br />

bbuilding ildi on th themes ddeveloped l diin MMaderno’s d ’ SSanta t SSusanna<br />

• The “aedicular façade” ‐‐ aedicule = canopied niche flanked by<br />

columns<br />

• The continuing relevance <strong>of</strong> the model <strong>of</strong> Michelangelo’s<br />

work – such as: 1) the “buried” buried columns in the Laurentian<br />

Library 2) the broken pediments, giant orders in the<br />

buildings <strong>of</strong> the Campidoglio<br />

• The role <strong>of</strong> this architecture in the urban planning schemes<br />

• Finally – a look at Gianlorenzo Bernini, as the first <strong>Baroque</strong><br />

era “genius” (the second, Francesco Borromini to be looked at<br />

in depth on Wed)<br />

• And Bernini’s role in the completion <strong>of</strong> Saint Peters<br />

Two general plan<br />

typologies used – per<br />

Norberg­Schulz<br />

Ching p502


Significant<br />

issues:<br />

• Sixtus V (1585­<br />

1590) –larger<br />

scale planning<br />

than any <strong>of</strong> his<br />

predecessors<br />

predecessors,<br />

• Planned<br />

straight,<br />

connecting<br />

streets between<br />

important<br />

church sites<br />

• The beginning<br />

<strong>of</strong> the “Gr<strong>and</strong><br />

M Manner” ” <strong>of</strong> f<br />

urban planning:<br />

vistas / axial<br />

connections / the<br />

“trivium”<br />

connection <strong>of</strong><br />

three roads at a<br />

center point…<br />

Giovanni Battista Nolli, Plan <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rome</strong> (1748)<br />

“Nolli” Map –showing figure/ground relationship <strong>of</strong> building mass to open<br />

space – <strong>Rome</strong> in the 17th space <strong>Rome</strong> in the 17 century century, the <strong>Baroque</strong> era<br />

Tomman<br />

p14


The <strong>Baroque</strong> building culture <strong>of</strong> <strong>Rome</strong>:<br />

w/ / in this urban structure…<br />

five examples <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Baroque</strong> “feel”, “style” <strong>of</strong> the 17 th century architecture <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>Rome</strong>:<br />

• SSanti ti LLuca e Martina, M ti Pi Pietro t dda CCortona t (1634 (1634‐1650) 1650)<br />

• Santi Vincenzo e Anastasio, Martino Longhi, the younger (1646‐1650)<br />

• Santa Maria in Campitelli, Carlo Rainaldi (1663‐1667)<br />

• San Andrea della Valle, Carlo Rainaldi, Carlo Fontana (1662 (1662‐1666) 1666)<br />

• San Marcello al Corso, Carlo Fontana (1682‐1683)


Santi Luca e Martina, Pietro da Cortona, <strong>Rome</strong> (1634­1650)<br />

Slightly convex bowing <strong>of</strong> wall – between two “sturdy” corner piers –<strong>Baroque</strong> expression <strong>of</strong><br />

dynamic motion: “<strong>Baroque</strong> expansion”<br />

S Gilchrist photo


• “Stretched”<br />

centralized plan –<br />

longer main axis<br />

• Apses not purely<br />

semi­circular<br />

• Layering <strong>of</strong><br />

columns in interior<br />

space –as in façade<br />

• Heavy / massive<br />

• Unity over parts<br />

• Organic g “swelling” g<br />

berg‐Schulz p92<br />

Norb<br />

Santi Luca e Martina –plan <strong>and</strong> elevation<br />

Toman p26


Varriano p11<br />

Santi Luca e Martina – ceiling view at<br />

Santi Luca e Martina – view <strong>of</strong> main interior<br />

apse end<br />

axis<br />

Toman p24


Santi Luca e Martina – façade detail<br />

S Gilchrist photo


Portoghesi p2003<br />

Santi Vincenzo e Anastasio,<br />

Martino Longhi, the<br />

younger (1646­1650)<br />

• Similar composition but w/<br />

unique screen wall <strong>of</strong> full<br />

columns (vs. pilasters) /<br />

irregular spacing<br />

• Pediments set w/ in<br />

pediments (mannerist device?)<br />

G<br />

– but very three three­dimensional…<br />

dimensional S<br />

Gilchrist photo


Santa Maria in Compitelli,<br />

Carlo Rainaldi (1663­67) ( )<br />

• Column screen <strong>of</strong> Santi Vincenzo<br />

developed into more simplified<br />

aedicule motif<br />

• Very clear example <strong>of</strong> typical (3)<br />

layer façade<br />

hrist photo<br />

S Gilch<br />

Lemerle L p46


Santa Maria in Compitelli –plan / interior<br />

space / ceiling vault view:<br />

• Continuity w/ exterior – similar layering in<br />

interior space<br />

• Axial plan –two centralized portions linked<br />

together… g<br />

Norberg‐Schulz p944<br />

S Gilchrist photo<br />

S Gilchrist G photo


Santa Maria in Compitelli – additional views <strong>of</strong> interior space<br />

S Gilchrist photoo<br />

S Gilchrist photoo


• Façade: A “High <strong>Baroque</strong>” version<br />

<strong>of</strong> Santa Susanna?<br />

• Aedicules Aedicules, <strong>and</strong> Michelangelo Michelangelo’s s<br />

“recessed” Laurentian Library<br />

columns<br />

• The basic, conservative, Il Gesu<br />

Norbeerg‐Schulz<br />

p64<br />

Sant Andrea della Valle, Carlo Rainaldi, Carlo<br />

church plan Fontana (1662­1666) (1662 1666), facade<br />

Lemerle p46


Per plan:<br />

A “classic” Il Gesu­like interior…<br />

Sant Andrea della Valle Valle, interior view<br />

z p60<br />

S Norberg‐Schulz


• A late version <strong>of</strong> the Roman High<br />

<strong>Baroque</strong> façade, as per many <strong>of</strong> the other<br />

examples already shown:<br />

• Curving façade<br />

• Interest built up towards the center<br />

• Three h llayers<br />

• Detached columns as well as<br />

pilasters<br />

• Aedicule front<br />

San Marcello al Corso, Carlo Fontana (1682­<br />

1683)<br />

p47<br />

Lemerle


The “trivium” trivium at Piazza<br />

del Popolo:<br />

(see Kost<strong>of</strong> p489)<br />

Axial views marked by<br />

Egyptian obelisks… obelisks<br />

p21<br />

Norberg‐Schulz p<br />

These energetic,<br />

expansive <strong>Baroque</strong><br />

façades, <strong>and</strong> church<br />

plans as a part <strong>of</strong> the<br />

“expansive” evolving<br />

<strong>Baroque</strong> city<br />

fframework… k<br />

Sixtus V’s city plan – 1585­1590:<br />

The basis for city development in the 17 th century<br />

S Fazio p342


Piazza del Popolo<br />

Per “Nolli” map Aerial view<br />

Wittkower p104<br />

Fazio p352<br />

Attini p258


View <strong>of</strong> Piazza del Popolo<br />

hrist photo<br />

S Gilch


Place for public gathering, spectacle<br />

Fountains…<br />

Piazza Navona<br />

4<br />

Fazio p35<br />

S Gilchrist photo<br />

Fazio p350


Piazza Navona –w/ curved front <strong>of</strong> Saint Agnese opening onto the square<br />

n p31<br />

Toman


Piazza di Spagna –<strong>and</strong> the “Spanish Steps”<br />

Slightly later work, 1717 ­­ Francesco di Sanctis<br />

Varriano p170<br />

Portoghesi p61


Spanish Steps…<br />

Fazio p353<br />

n p49<br />

Toman


Gianlorenzo Bernini (b1598­1680)<br />

Sculptor –considered the17 th Century<br />

equivalent <strong>of</strong> Michelangelo –the first<br />

great “genius” <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Baroque</strong> era…<br />

Bernini – Cornaro Chapel – “architect “architecture re as theater”<br />

S Portooghesi<br />

p94<br />

“The Ecstasy <strong>of</strong> Saint Teresa”<br />

S Gillchrist<br />

photo


Sant Andrea al Quirinale, Bernini, (1658­1670)<br />

Wittkower W p27<br />

Portogghesi<br />

p99<br />

• Bernini’s architectural masterpiece – elliptical plan / based on short axis<br />

• Similar “architectural theater” –focus <strong>of</strong> the building on alter art work<br />

S Gilchhrist<br />

photo


Lemerlle<br />

p66<br />

Portico w/ in aedicule frame Interior: focus on alter –again, painting,<br />

scultpture, architecture work together ­­<br />

architecture more as a backdrop for the<br />

sculptural narrative?<br />

Lemerlle<br />

p67


Saint Andrea al Quirinale ­­ interior space<br />

Gilchrist photo<br />

S G


Saint Andrea al Quirinale ­­­ dome, conclusion <strong>of</strong> narrative<br />

Gilchrist photo<br />

S G


Carlo Maderno: extension <strong>of</strong> nave / façade (1606­1626)<br />

Gianlorenzo Bernini – colonnade / piazza, completes ensemble (1657­1667)<br />

Saint Peters – culmination <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Baroque</strong> city…<br />

city<br />

azio p344<br />

Fa


Saint Peters ­­ colonnade <strong>and</strong> piazza –diagrams / plan<br />

Norberg‐Scchulz<br />

p27<br />

Fazio p345


Views inside the colonnade…<br />

photo<br />

S Gilchrist<br />

S Gilchrist photo<br />

photo<br />

S Gilchrist


• Dramatic shifts <strong>of</strong><br />

light / dark<br />

• forced perspective<br />

intensifies f the<br />

dramatic effect –<br />

again, architecture as<br />

theater…<br />

Varriano p84<br />

Wittkoower<br />

p35<br />

…<strong>and</strong> the Scala Regia / Bernini’s <strong>Baroque</strong> stairway connection<br />

to Vatican palace<br />

Lemerlle<br />

p67


Michelangelo’s Plan St Peters as completed by Carlo<br />

Maderno<br />

azio p312, 344<br />

Fa


Alternate scheme showing<br />

intended corner towers<br />

Toman p226<br />

Maderno’s “long” facade<br />

Section thru extended nave<br />

photo<br />

S Gilchrist<br />

S Fazio p344


St Peters –interior space: p vision <strong>of</strong> f Bramante / Michelangelo… g<br />

to<br />

S Gilchrist phot


And Bernini’s contributions –the Cathedra<br />

Petri, the thrown <strong>of</strong> Saint Peter<br />

Norberg‐Schulz p1444<br />

The Baldacchino at the high alter, w/<br />

twisting, “Solomonic” columns…<br />

Lemerle p65


z p<strong>18</strong>0<br />

S Norberg‐Schultz


st photo<br />

S Gilchris


Reading:<br />

Trachtenberg pp 327‐348 (Chapter Nine: The <strong>Baroque</strong>)<br />

Kost<strong>of</strong> pp 511‐526 (Chapter 21: Absolutism <strong>and</strong> the Bourgeoisie)<br />

Optional: Kost<strong>of</strong> pp 496­509 (Chapter 20: Popes as Planners)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!