consideration - City of Alexandria
consideration - City of Alexandria
consideration - City of Alexandria
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
To Members <strong>of</strong> <strong>City</strong> Council:<br />
On Saturday January 21 the <strong>City</strong> Council will vote on the city's<br />
proposed waterfront plan.<br />
The current waterfront plan is not right for <strong>Alexandria</strong>. The only<br />
sensible thing to do at this point is to delay the vote until a time<br />
that the entire waterfront can be considered. The GenOn site needs to<br />
be considered in any decision-making regarding any waterfront plan. At<br />
a minimum, Council should postpont any vote until GenOn site can also<br />
be a part <strong>of</strong> the discussion. Please understand that <strong>City</strong> Council<br />
represents the community, not the Washington Post or commercial<br />
developers. I have lived in <strong>Alexandria</strong> since 1968 and I have seen many<br />
changes occur in this city along the waterfront some good, some not so<br />
good but the current plan does not address the resident's real concerns<br />
and the residents would like to see real alternative plans.<br />
I can't imagine how difficult life will become for me and other<br />
residents directly affected by the rezoning. The waterfront is for<br />
all, not just <strong>Alexandria</strong>ns, but visitors as well, however, those living<br />
in Rosemont, Del Ray, West End and visitors don't have to worry about<br />
where they are going to park when they return from a trip to the<br />
grocery store and need to unload a car or return from a trip and need<br />
to unload the car or have small children and have to drive around for<br />
what seems like forever with a child screaming in the back seat. Right<br />
now I am spending between 15 and 30 minutes driving around, adding<br />
additional pollution to the air, not to mention the extra wear and tear<br />
on my car and the extra gas expense I have because I can't find a<br />
parking place within a 2-3 block radius <strong>of</strong> where I live. What will it<br />
be like if you vote to rezone to allow motels at the bottom <strong>of</strong> Duke and<br />
Wolfe Street along the waterfront? It also will prevent the public,<br />
including neighbors from using the waterfront unless one spends money<br />
to use hotel restaurants~I don't see how this increases public use <strong>of</strong><br />
the waterfront.<br />
I am vehemently opposed to changes to 1983 waterfront agreement that<br />
would allow hotels and changes to the 1992 W-l zone that would allow<br />
more density. I would prefer an open waterfront, but know that won't<br />
happen. The next best thing would be something similar to Harborside<br />
where there are private residences but a beautiful public area where<br />
all can walk or sit and enjoy watching river traffic, waterfowl, and<br />
walkers/joggers. But the single biggest thing Harborside has is<br />
parking spaces for all its residents. Or even <strong>of</strong>fices. Hotel guests<br />
will balk at paying huge fees to park in garages and hotel employees<br />
will not take shuttles. I, and other residents, will be fighting for<br />
parking spaces near where we live<br />
I have listened to what the other side has said, and realize that most<br />
don't live near ground zero. Those that do, who are for the plan, have<br />
a financial interest in the proposed changes.<br />
Please, please consider this heartfelt letter and vote NO to rezoning<br />
the waterfront and the current waterfront plan.<br />
Respectfully,<br />
Carolyne Roehrenbeck