30.06.2013 Views

12-02-Cahier-R- ... e-Chevallier-Gastineau.pdf - Base ...

12-02-Cahier-R- ... e-Chevallier-Gastineau.pdf - Base ...

12-02-Cahier-R- ... e-Chevallier-Gastineau.pdf - Base ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

energy efficiency coefficients – i.e. for the aircraft fleet of a specific geographical zone, taken<br />

as whole – and (ii) their corresponding energy efficiency gains. Both are obtained based on<br />

empirical data obtained from the IEA and the ICAO. Energy efficiency coefficients and their<br />

evolution rules (i.e. energy efficiency gains) until 2<strong>02</strong>5 are obtained by directly comparing the<br />

evolution of jet fuel consumption (taken from IEA data) and air traffic (taken from ICAO<br />

data). Figure 3 illustrates this approach 21 .<br />

Jet fuel (Mtoe)<br />

250<br />

200<br />

150<br />

100<br />

50<br />

0<br />

1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003<br />

1000<br />

750<br />

500<br />

250<br />

Jet fuel (IEA data) Air Traffic (ICAO data)<br />

0<br />

Air traffic (10 9 ATK)<br />

EE coefficient<br />

(10 −7 ktoe.ATK −1 )<br />

5<br />

4<br />

3<br />

2<br />

1<br />

0<br />

1983 1987 1991 1995 1999 2003<br />

Figure 3: Jet fuel consumption (Million Tonnes of Oil Equivalent (Mtoe)), Air traffic (ATK,<br />

billions) and Energy Efficiency (EE) coefficients at the world level. Illustration of the approach<br />

used to compute EE coefficients and their yearly growth rates (i.e. energy efficiency gains)<br />

for the aviation sector.<br />

Source: Authors, from ICAO and IEA data.<br />

These results are commented in Chèze et al. (20<strong>12</strong>) and summarized in Chèze et al.<br />

(2011). We thus only present here the main conclusions, i.e. the three “Traffic efficiency<br />

improvements” scenarios. These scenarios are defined according to the following results on<br />

[air traffic] energy [efficiency] gains: (i) some regions are more energy efficient than others,<br />

and (ii) regions do not encounter the same energy gains. By combining the current energy<br />

21 In Figure 3 (left panel), the dotted black line represents air traffic (expressed in ATK) and the solid black<br />

line represents jet fuel consumption (expressed in Mtoe) for a given region. As explained in Chèze et al. (2011,<br />

20<strong>12</strong>), energy efficiency coefficients for each year may be obtained by computing Mtoe/ATK (right panel),<br />

where ATK means “Available Tonne kilometre”. Thus defined, Energy Efficiency (EE) coefficients correspond<br />

to the quantity of jet fuel required to power the transportation of one tonne over one kilometre. For a given<br />

regional aircraft fleet, EEt+1 < EEt means that quantities of jet fuel required to power the transportation of<br />

one tonne over one kilometre have decreased. Thus, a negative growth rate of EE coefficients, as it is expected,<br />

indicates the realization of energy efficiency improvements in air traffic for the region under consideration. As<br />

it may be deduced from the illustrative Figure 3, EE coefficients negative growth rates arise when, in a given<br />

year, jet fuel consumption growth rates are slower than air traffic ones.<br />

<strong>12</strong>

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!