Download - Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines
Download - Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines
Download - Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
LEGAL ISSUES<br />
AND CONCERNS<br />
AFFECTING<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
PRIVATE<br />
EDUCATION<br />
30 AUGUST 2012<br />
ATTY. ADA D. ABAD<br />
Legal Counsel, CEAP<br />
Former Vice-Dean, Lyceum College <strong>of</strong> Law;<br />
Managing Associate<br />
Antonio H. Abad & Associates Law Office<br />
1
CEAP NATIONAL ASSEMBLY<br />
SM MALL OF ASIA – SMX CONVENTION<br />
30 AUGUST 2012, 11:15A.M. – 1:15 P.M.<br />
SCOPE OF OUR TALK<br />
TODAY:<br />
• K-12 LABOR IMPLICATIONS<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
2
ACADEMIC FREEDOM VS.<br />
FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION OR<br />
FREEDOM OF RELIGION<br />
ATENEO PROFESSORS<br />
WEARING OF HIJAB<br />
• CYBERBULLYING<br />
• TAXATION, DOC STAMPS AND<br />
PERMITS ISSUES<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
3
POSSIBLE ISSUES<br />
FOR TEACHERS<br />
ARISING FROM THE<br />
SHIFT TO K-12:<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
4
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
main thrusts <strong>of</strong><br />
President<br />
Noynoy’s<br />
administration<br />
is educational<br />
reform through<br />
<strong>the</strong> K-12<br />
program.<br />
5
Under this scheme,<br />
kindergarten is made<br />
compulsory for all children<br />
and an additional two years<br />
<strong>of</strong> senior high school is to<br />
be likewise mandated.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
6
How Do<br />
We Add<br />
<strong>the</strong> Two<br />
Years?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
7
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
8
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
9
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
10
Aside from curriculum<br />
revision, one practical<br />
problem posed to Basic Ed<br />
schools would be <strong>the</strong><br />
logistical issue <strong>of</strong> faculty<br />
movement and resources that<br />
would be required for <strong>the</strong> shift<br />
to <strong>the</strong> K-12 program.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
11
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
12
1. Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> School would<br />
have sufficient resources to<br />
put up a senior high school<br />
facility (Grades 11 and 12),<br />
to add to its present ten-<br />
year basic education<br />
program.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
13
2. Assuming that <strong>the</strong> School<br />
will incorporate <strong>the</strong> senior<br />
high school level (Grades<br />
11 and 12), whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />
School’s present faculty<br />
complement have <strong>the</strong><br />
necessary numbers to<br />
address <strong>the</strong> additional two<br />
(2) years?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
14
3. What are <strong>the</strong> academic<br />
qualifications for teachers<br />
that will be assigned or<br />
hired to teach Grades 11<br />
and 12?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
15
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
16
1. Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> 4-year or 5-<br />
year academic courses<br />
will be lessened to 3-<br />
years or 4-years<br />
respectively?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
17
1.1 If NO, <strong>the</strong>n two-year period<br />
is simply a transition period<br />
and by academic year<br />
2018-2019, all will go back<br />
to normal<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
18
1.2 IF YES, and 1 st – 2 nd year<br />
subjects moved down to 11 th -<br />
12 th grades, <strong>the</strong>n SOME<br />
faculty movements may<br />
have to become permanent<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
19
2. NEED TO KNOW PARAMETERS<br />
IN THE ENABLING LAW ON<br />
TRANSITION PERIOD,<br />
PARTICULARLY WHETHER<br />
COLLEGE TEACHERS MAY<br />
TEACH GR 11 AND 12 DURING<br />
TWO YEAR TRANSITION<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
20
3. Considering that <strong>the</strong> rates<br />
<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> college pr<strong>of</strong>essors are<br />
different from that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basic<br />
elementary teachers, will this<br />
be considered a demotion or a<br />
diminution <strong>of</strong> salaries?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
21
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
22
SCENARIO 1:<br />
BASIC<br />
EDUCATION<br />
SCHOOL DOES<br />
NOT SET UP AN<br />
11 TH AND 12 TH<br />
GRADE; NO<br />
COLLEGE LEVEL<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
23
PARAMETERS OF<br />
SCENARIO 1:<br />
1. K-12 FULLY IMPLEMENTED<br />
2. AY 2016-2017<br />
AY 2017-2018<br />
3. NO COLLEGE LEVEL<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
GRADES 11 TH<br />
AND 12 TH NOT<br />
TO BE SET UP<br />
24
1.1 NO ADDITIONAL<br />
REQUIREMENT FOR<br />
FACULTY AND<br />
HENCE, NO<br />
MOVEMENT<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
25
1.2 SCHOOL GIVES<br />
CERTIFICATE FOR<br />
JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL,<br />
AND RELEASES TRANSFER<br />
CREDENTIALS FOR JUNIOR<br />
HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
26
1.3 SCHOOL MAY COME UP<br />
WITH MEMORANDUM OF<br />
AGREEMENT AS FEEDER<br />
SCHOOL TO:<br />
A STAND-ALONE 11-12 TH<br />
GRADE SCHOOL OR<br />
ANOTHER SCHOOL WITH<br />
11-12 TH GRADES OR<br />
CONSORTIUM SENIOR HIGH<br />
SCHOOL CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
27
• NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSES<br />
• NO LOGISTICAL PROBLEM<br />
ON FACULTY MOVEMENT<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
28
• POSSIBILITY THAT SCHOOL<br />
MAY LOSE SOME OF THE HIGH<br />
SCHOOL GR7-10 MARKET AS<br />
PARENTS WOULD WANT<br />
INTEGRATED SENIOR HIGH<br />
SCHOOL<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
29
SCENARIO 2:<br />
BASIC<br />
EDUCATION<br />
SCHOOL WILL<br />
SET UP 11 TH AND<br />
12 TH GRADES; NO<br />
COLLEGE LEVEL<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
30
PARAMETERS OF<br />
SCENARIO 2:<br />
1. K-12 FULLY IMPLEMENTED<br />
2. AY 2016-2017<br />
AY 2017-2018<br />
3. NO COLLEGE LEVEL<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
GRADES 11 TH<br />
AND 12 TH TO BE<br />
SET UP BY<br />
SCHOOL<br />
31
2.1 CHECK WHETHER THE<br />
SCHOOL’S PRESENT<br />
FACULTY COMPLEMENT<br />
HAVE THE NECESSARY<br />
NUMBERS TO ADDRESS<br />
THE ADDITIONAL TWO<br />
(2) YEARS<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
32
2.2 IF PRESENT FACULTY<br />
COMPLEMENT<br />
SUFFICIENT TO<br />
ADDRESS THE 11 TH -12 TH<br />
GRADES REQUIREMENT,<br />
THEN SIMPLY ASSIGN<br />
SUBJECTS TO THEM.<br />
CONSIDER OVERLOAD<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
33
2.3 IF PRESENT FACULTY<br />
COMPLEMENT IS NOT<br />
SUFFICIENT TO<br />
ADDRESS THE 11 TH -12 TH<br />
GRADES REQUIREMENT,<br />
THEN SCHOOL MUST<br />
HIRE NEW FACULTY<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
34
• FACULTY FOR BASIC ED<br />
MUST HAVE PASSED<br />
LICENSURE EXAMINATION<br />
FOR TEACHERS (LET)<br />
• SAME POLICIES AND<br />
REQUIREMENTS FOR<br />
PROBATIONARY FACULTY<br />
• MGMT PREROGATIVE TO<br />
DETERMINE RATES (SAME OR<br />
HIGHER) CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
35
• DUE TO CREATION OF SENIOR<br />
HIGH SCHOOL, STUDENTS CAN<br />
COMPLETE THEIR ENTIRE BASIC<br />
EDUCATION COURSE IN THE<br />
SCHOOL<br />
• POSSIBLY HIGHER ENROLMENT<br />
FROM TRANSFERREES OF<br />
SCHOOLS WITHOUT 11 TH -12 TH GR<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
36
• IF FACULTY IS NOT SUFFICIENT,<br />
SCHOOL MUST HIRE NEW<br />
FACULTY<br />
• ADDITIONAL EXPENSES TO BE<br />
INCURRED FOR FACILITIES<br />
AND FACULTY PAY<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
37
• IF FACULTY IS SUFFICIENT,<br />
LOGISTICAL PROBLEMS ON<br />
FACULTY MOVEMENT,<br />
PRIORITIZATION AS TO<br />
ASSIGNMENTS WILL ARISE<br />
• MINOR ISSUE ON PAY RATE<br />
(TO BE DISCUSSED LATER)<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
38
SCENARIO 3:<br />
BASIC<br />
EDUCATION<br />
SCHOOL WILL<br />
SET UP 11 TH AND<br />
12 TH GRADES;<br />
WITH COLLEGE<br />
LEVEL<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
39
SCENARIO 4:<br />
COLLEGE LEVEL;<br />
WITH OR WITHOUT<br />
BASIC ED SCHOOL<br />
BUT PUTTING UP<br />
11 TH- 12 TH GRADES<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
40
PARAMETERS OF<br />
SCENARIOS 3 & 4:<br />
1. K-12 FULLY IMPLEMENTED<br />
2. AY 2016-2017<br />
AY 2017-2018<br />
NO FIRST YEAR<br />
COLLEGE<br />
STUDENTS<br />
3. WITH BOTH BASIC ED AND COLLEGE<br />
LEVELS; OR PUTTING UP SENIOR HIGH<br />
SCHOOL<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
41
IN SCENARIOS 3 & 4, YOU<br />
HAVE A COLLEGE WHICH WILL<br />
HAVE NO 1 ST YEAR COLLEGE<br />
ENROLLEES FOR ACADEMIC<br />
YEARS 2016-2017 AND 2017-<br />
2018, WHEN THE K-12 IS FULLY<br />
IMPLEMENTED AND 11TH-12TH<br />
GRADES IN TRANSITION<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
42
PROBLEM:<br />
WHAT TO DO WITH<br />
COLLEGE<br />
PROFESSORS IN THE<br />
1 ST AND 2 ND YEAR<br />
LEVELS WHO WILL<br />
NOT HAVE LOAD FOR<br />
TWO YEARS?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
43
ASSIGN GRADE 11-12<br />
SUBJECTS TO<br />
QUALIFIED<br />
PROFESSORS FROM<br />
THE COLLEGE LEVEL<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
44
FROM AMONG EXISTING<br />
COLLEGE FACULTY<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
45
COLLEGE<br />
PROF –<br />
LICENSED<br />
Bed<br />
TEACHER<br />
SORTING HAT<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
COLLEGE<br />
PROF –<br />
WITHOUT<br />
LICENSURE<br />
EXAM; check<br />
also FULL-TIME<br />
AND PART-TIME<br />
46
IF PART-TIME AND HENCE NOT<br />
TENURED, SIMPLY DO NOT<br />
REHIRE OR GIVE<br />
APPOINTMENTS<br />
IF FULL-TIME AND HENCE,<br />
TENURED, THEN SCHOOL IS<br />
INITIALLY UNDER OBLIGATION<br />
TO CHECK ALTERNATIVE<br />
MEASURES<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
47
COLLEGE PROFESSOR<br />
WHO IS ALSO LICENSED<br />
Bed TEACHER<br />
TO BE GIVEN PRIORITY IN<br />
ASSIGNMENT OF 11 TH -12 TH<br />
GRADE SUBJECTS<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
48
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
49
THOSE WHO<br />
ARE WILLING<br />
TO TEACH<br />
GR 11-12<br />
FROM AMONG EXISTING FULL-<br />
TIME COLLEGE FACULTY<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
THOSE WHO<br />
ARE NOT<br />
WILLING TO<br />
TEACH<br />
GR 11-12<br />
50
THOSE WILLING<br />
TO TAKE<br />
LICENSURE<br />
EXAM IN TIME<br />
FOR 2016-2018<br />
FULL-TIME COLLEGE PROF<br />
WILLING TO TEACH GR 11-12<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
ENABLING LAW<br />
ALLOWS<br />
COLLEGE<br />
PROFESSORS TO<br />
TEACH GR11-12<br />
51
ASSIGN TO<br />
RESEARCH<br />
OR ADMIN<br />
WORK FOR<br />
TWO YEARS<br />
FULL-TIME COLLEGE PROF<br />
NOT WILLING OR UNABLE<br />
TO TEACH GR 11-12<br />
AGREE TO<br />
PUT ON<br />
FLOATING<br />
STATUS OR<br />
SABBATICAL<br />
WITHOUT<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
PAY<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
RETRENCH-<br />
MENT OR<br />
REDUNDANCY<br />
OR EARLY<br />
RETIREMENT<br />
52
• EXISTING FACULTY CAN BE<br />
RETAINED, IF ALL AGREE TO<br />
TEACH IN GRADES 11-12<br />
DURING TRANSITION<br />
• HOPEFULLY NO CHANGE IN THE<br />
RATE OF STUDENT ENROLMENT<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
53
• DISARRAY IN THE FACULTY BUILD<br />
UP, IF MOST DO NOT AGREE TO<br />
TEACH GR 11-12<br />
• IN CHOOSING TO HAVE A<br />
COMPROMISE ON RATES AND/ OR<br />
SEPARATION PAY TO FACULTY,<br />
SCHOOLS WILL HAVE TO INCUR<br />
HIGH ADMIN EXPENSES<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
54
SCENARIO 5:<br />
STAND-ALONE<br />
COLLEGE OR<br />
UNIVERSITY<br />
WITHOUT K-12<br />
NO 1 ST AND 2 ND<br />
YEAR STUDENTS<br />
2016-2018<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
55
PARAMETERS OF<br />
SCENARIO 5:<br />
1. K-12 FULLY IMPLEMENTED<br />
2. AY 2016-2017<br />
AY 2017-2018<br />
NO FIRST YEAR<br />
COLLEGE<br />
STUDENTS<br />
3. COLLEGE LEVEL ONLY; NO BASIC EDUC<br />
FEEDER SCHOOL AND WILL NOT PUT UP<br />
SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
56
ASSIGN TO<br />
RESEARCH<br />
OR ADMIN<br />
WORK FOR<br />
TWO YEARS<br />
FULL-TIME COLLEGE PROF<br />
WITHOUT ANY SUBJECT LOAD<br />
FOR TWO YEARS<br />
AGREE TO<br />
PUT ON<br />
FLOATING<br />
STATUS OR<br />
SABBATICAL<br />
WITHOUT<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
PAY<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
RETRENCH-<br />
MENT OR<br />
REDUNDANCY<br />
OR EARLY<br />
RETIREMENT<br />
57
• POSSIBLE TO RETAIN ENTIRE<br />
FACULTY, IF ALL CAN BE<br />
ACCOMMODATED TO ADMIN OR<br />
RESEARCH POSITIONS<br />
• LESS ADMIN COSTS<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
58
• INCUR HIGH EXPENSES ON<br />
SEPARATION PAY AND / OTHER<br />
BENEFITS, IF ALL HAVE TO BE<br />
RETRENCHED OR DECLARED<br />
REDUNDANT<br />
• POSSIBILITY OF CLOSURE OF<br />
SCHOOL / BANKRUPTCY<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
59
ASSIGN OR<br />
SECOND THE<br />
COLLEGE<br />
PROFESSORS<br />
TO THE<br />
CONSORTIUM<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
60
ASSUMPTIONS:<br />
1. Enabling law allows for college<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essors to teach grades 11-<br />
12 during <strong>the</strong> transition<br />
2. School is a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
consortium that will put up <strong>the</strong><br />
Senior High School (Gr 11-12)<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
61
ISSUES:<br />
1.WILL THE CONSORTIUM<br />
SCHOOL BE CONSIDERED<br />
A SEPARATE JURIDICAL<br />
ENTITY?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
62
IF NO, THEN:<br />
LOGISTICAL PROBLEM ON HOW<br />
AND WHO WILL HANDLE<br />
FINANCIAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND<br />
REPORTORIAL REQUIREMENTS OF<br />
THE CONSORTIUM<br />
STANDARDIZATION OF RATES OF<br />
THE PROFESSORS/TEACHERS<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
63
IF YES, THEN :<br />
AFTER TRANSITION PERIOD, WILL THE<br />
COLLEGE PROFESSORS RETURN TO<br />
THEIR BASE SCHOOL?<br />
IF TRANSFER IS PERMANENT, THEN<br />
WHAT HAPPENS TO THE YEARS OF<br />
SERVICE OF THE TRANSFERRED<br />
FACULTY? NOTE THAT ORIGINAL<br />
SCHOOL MUST HAVE SEPARATED THEM<br />
(REDUNDANCY, RETRENCHMENT OR EARLY<br />
RETIREMT)<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
64
FREEZE HIRING<br />
PRIOR TO<br />
2016-2018<br />
• ONLY PART-TIMERS<br />
TO BE HIRED<br />
• PRESENT FACULTY<br />
TO BE PREPARED FOR<br />
TRANSITION<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
65
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
66
Considering that <strong>the</strong> rates <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> college pr<strong>of</strong>essors are<br />
different from that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
basic elementary teachers,<br />
will this be considered a<br />
demotion or a diminution <strong>of</strong><br />
salaries?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
67
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
68
OPTIONS<br />
1. Same rate as <strong>the</strong> Basic<br />
Education teachers –<br />
possibly diminution <strong>of</strong> salary<br />
and hence, may only be done<br />
with consent <strong>of</strong> faculty<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
69
2. Same rate as <strong>the</strong> College<br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essors – no problem<br />
3. Midway compromise between<br />
college and basic education<br />
rates -- possibly diminution <strong>of</strong><br />
salary and hence, may only be<br />
done with consent <strong>of</strong> faculty<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
70
4. If does not agree to<br />
Options 1 or 3, <strong>the</strong>n:<br />
Retrenchment<br />
Redundancy<br />
Floating Status<br />
Early Retirement<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
71
Generally, this concept applies to<br />
higher educational institution.<br />
However, to a limited extent, this is<br />
applicable to private educational<br />
institutions <strong>of</strong>fering basic education<br />
(elementary and high school levels).<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
72
Origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word<br />
“ACADEMIC” – referring<br />
to <strong>the</strong> garden grove<br />
near Ancient Greece<br />
called “AKADEMEIA,”<br />
where <strong>the</strong> esteemed<br />
philosopher Plato (428-<br />
348 B.C.) held court<br />
and taught a school <strong>of</strong><br />
select students.<br />
O.D. Corpuz, “Academic Freedom in Higher<br />
Education”, Second Lecture, 09 Nov. 1995.<br />
Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Emeritus, University <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Philippines</strong>.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
73
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
• Subjects in Akademeia<br />
essentially concerned <strong>the</strong><br />
search for truth, <strong>the</strong><br />
good, <strong>the</strong> best in life<br />
• Thus, it was natural and<br />
essential in <strong>the</strong> Greek<br />
tradition that <strong>the</strong><br />
“Akademeia” be “free”<br />
from outside<br />
constraints.<br />
74
MATRIX IN THE CONTEXT OF<br />
THE INSTITUTION<br />
ACADEMIC FREEDOM<br />
VS VS<br />
THE TEACHER THE STUDENT<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
75
• who may teach<br />
• what may be taught<br />
• how it shall be taught;<br />
• and who may be admitted to<br />
study. (Garcia vs. The Faculty Admission Committee, Loyola<br />
School <strong>of</strong> Theology, 68 SCRA 277, citing Justice Frankfurter's concurring<br />
opinion in Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 US 234, 263 [1957]).<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
76
(1) <strong>the</strong> appointment and tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong><br />
academic staff; and<br />
(2) <strong>the</strong> curricula for courses <strong>of</strong> study;<br />
(3) <strong>the</strong> admission, examination and<br />
retention <strong>of</strong> students until graduation;<br />
(4) <strong>the</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> income among <strong>the</strong><br />
different categories <strong>of</strong> expenditure.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
77
WHAT MAY BE<br />
TAUGHT?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
78
Institutions <strong>of</strong> higher learning have<br />
<strong>the</strong> right to determine <strong>the</strong> curricular<br />
program for <strong>the</strong> different courses <strong>of</strong><br />
study in conformity with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
objectives or mission statements.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
79
POSSIBLE CONFLICTS ON THE<br />
ISSUE OF “WHAT TO TEACH”<br />
Despite curricular autonomy,<br />
academic institutions however may<br />
exercise self-censorship by:<br />
(a) refusing to <strong>of</strong>fer subjects which<br />
are contradictory to its vision-<br />
mission-goals;<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
80
(b) exercising supervisory powers by<br />
restricting teachers from discussing<br />
matters contradictory to vision-<br />
mission-goals;<br />
(c) imposing disciplinary sanctions<br />
upon teachers who teach<br />
controversial positions on matters<br />
outside <strong>the</strong> ambit <strong>of</strong> his/her subject<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
81
IN A SECULAR CONTEXT, LOOK AT<br />
THESE ISSUES IN THE UNITED<br />
STATES:<br />
In USA Patriot Act [Uniting (and) Streng<strong>the</strong>ning<br />
America (by) Providing Appropriate Tools Required (to)<br />
Intercept (and) Obstruct Terrorism Act <strong>of</strong> 2001] arising from<br />
<strong>the</strong> 9-11 World Trade bombing, allowing <strong>the</strong> FBI to<br />
intercept mails and correspondences from<br />
suspected terrorists, vis-à-vis freedom <strong>of</strong><br />
expression.<br />
Is this an indication that a scenario similar to that depicted<br />
in <strong>the</strong> movie “MINORITY REPORT” and concept <strong>of</strong> PRE-<br />
CRIME, may happen in <strong>the</strong> near future?<br />
82<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
possible<br />
censorship <strong>of</strong><br />
educational<br />
engineering<br />
websites which<br />
outline procedure<br />
to make a bomb, as<br />
what happened in<br />
Columbine high<br />
school.<br />
83
Keyishian vs. Board <strong>of</strong> Regents case<br />
where mere knowing membership in an<br />
organization which espouses and<br />
advocates violent overthrow <strong>of</strong> civil<br />
government, is not sufficient for<br />
termination <strong>of</strong> faculty member.<br />
There must exist ACTIVE and SPECIFIC<br />
intent on part <strong>of</strong> faculty member to<br />
advocate and teach <strong>the</strong> same to students<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
84
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
Greek katholikos<br />
universal,<br />
general,<br />
from katholou in<br />
general,<br />
from kata by<br />
+ holos whole —<br />
more at CATA-, SAFE<br />
85
If <strong>the</strong> essence <strong>of</strong> a university is <strong>the</strong> unbridled<br />
freedom <strong>of</strong> thought and expression,<br />
in juxtaposition with <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> schools run<br />
by congregations to limit <strong>the</strong>ir curriculum to<br />
conform with <strong>the</strong>ir vision-mission-goals,<br />
is <strong>the</strong>re really such a thing as a<br />
“<strong>Catholic</strong> University?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
86
Freedom <strong>of</strong> thought<br />
and expression<br />
vis-a-vis<br />
<strong>Catholic</strong> doctrines <strong>of</strong><br />
faith.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
87
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
88
Reproductive health and<br />
population control through<br />
artificial contraception<br />
higher sciences’<br />
experimentations on cloning<br />
<strong>of</strong> human beings and artificial<br />
insemination<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
89
HOW IT MAY<br />
BE TAUGHT?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
90
Academic freedom means that <strong>the</strong> teacher is<br />
entitled to full freedom in:<br />
"(a) research and in <strong>the</strong> publication <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> results, subject to <strong>the</strong> adequate<br />
performance <strong>of</strong> his o<strong>the</strong>r academic duties;<br />
(b) discussing his subject in <strong>the</strong><br />
classroom, but he should be careful not to<br />
introduce into his teaching controversial<br />
matter which has no relation to his subject;<br />
(c) The college or university teacher is a<br />
citizen, a member <strong>of</strong> a learned pr<strong>of</strong>ession,<br />
and an <strong>of</strong>ficer in an educational institution.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
91
Academic freedom also includes <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
faculty to freely express opinions based on<br />
bodies <strong>of</strong> evidence, research or systematic thought<br />
and inquiry. The opinions expressed might<br />
impeach or overturn conventional propositions or<br />
even challenge established doctrines --- without<br />
risk to <strong>the</strong>ir jobs, promotion and careers.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
92
Academic freedom implies a<br />
corresponding academic<br />
responsibility. The American Civil Liberties Union <strong>of</strong><br />
New York (in re: Academic Freedom and Academic Responsibility,<br />
New York ACLU 1953)<br />
The teacher plays two distinct roles: (a)<br />
as a pr<strong>of</strong>essor, which entails his<br />
conduct in teaching and o<strong>the</strong>r activities<br />
directly related to pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />
responsibilities; and (b) as a citizen.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
93
(1) A School may not impose any limitation<br />
upon <strong>the</strong> teacher’s freedom in <strong>the</strong><br />
exposition <strong>of</strong> his own subject in <strong>the</strong><br />
classroom or in addresses and publications<br />
outside <strong>the</strong> college, except ins<strong>of</strong>ar as:<br />
(a) <strong>the</strong> general necessity <strong>of</strong> adapting all<br />
instruction to <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> immature<br />
students; or<br />
(b) in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> institutions <strong>of</strong><br />
denominational or partisan character,<br />
specific stipulations in advance, fully<br />
understood and accepted by both parties<br />
limit <strong>the</strong> scope and character <strong>of</strong> instruction.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
94
(2) No teacher may claim as his right<br />
<strong>the</strong> privilege <strong>of</strong> discussion in his<br />
classroom controversial topics<br />
outside <strong>of</strong> his own field <strong>of</strong> study.<br />
The teacher is morally bound not to<br />
take advantage <strong>of</strong> his position by<br />
introducing into <strong>the</strong> classroom<br />
provocative discussions <strong>of</strong> irrelevant<br />
subjects not within <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> study.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
95
(3) The School should<br />
recognize that <strong>the</strong> teacher,<br />
in speaking or writing<br />
outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> institution<br />
upon subjects beyond <strong>the</strong><br />
scope <strong>of</strong> his own field <strong>of</strong><br />
study, is entitled precisely<br />
to <strong>the</strong> same freedom and<br />
is subject to <strong>the</strong> same<br />
responsibility as attached<br />
to all o<strong>the</strong>r citizens.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
96
If <strong>the</strong> extramural utterances <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> teacher<br />
should be such as to raise grave doubts<br />
concerning his fitness for <strong>the</strong> position, <strong>the</strong><br />
questions should in all cases be submitted<br />
to an appropriate committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> faculty <strong>of</strong><br />
which he is a member.<br />
It should be clearly understood that an<br />
institution assumes no responsibility for<br />
views expressed by members <strong>of</strong> its staff.<br />
On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> teachers should, when<br />
necessary, take pains to make it clear that<br />
<strong>the</strong>y are expressing only <strong>the</strong>ir personal<br />
opinions.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
97
ACADEMIC FREEDOM<br />
ATENEO AS A<br />
CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY<br />
VS<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
PRO-RH TEACHER<br />
98
Declaration <strong>of</strong> Support for House Bill 4244 (The<br />
Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health<br />
and Population and Development Bill) by<br />
individual faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ateneo de Manila<br />
University<br />
We, <strong>the</strong> undersigned individual faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ateneo de<br />
Manila University, declare our strong support for House<br />
Bill 4244, <strong>the</strong> consolidated Responsible Parenthood,<br />
Reproductive Health and Population and Development<br />
Bill (or RH Bill). We are heartened by <strong>the</strong> recent move <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
House <strong>of</strong> Representatives to terminate <strong>the</strong> protracted debates<br />
and interpellations on this bill which has languished in<br />
Congress since 1999.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
99
We urge our legislators to act swiftly and<br />
judiciously on <strong>the</strong> proposed amendments<br />
to <strong>the</strong> bill, and <strong>the</strong>reafter vote for its<br />
passage. We issue this call in our<br />
individual capacities as educators,<br />
researchers, medical doctors, lawyers,<br />
and citizens, and in no way speak for<br />
our University, <strong>the</strong> Society <strong>of</strong> Jesus, or<br />
<strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> our colleagues.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
100
MEDIA REPORTS <strong>of</strong> certain<br />
sectors urging Ateneo de<br />
Manila to investigate and<br />
impose sanctions upon <strong>the</strong><br />
pr<strong>of</strong>essors, for espousing<br />
positions contrary to <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Catholic</strong> Church.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
101
CEAP POSITION:<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
102
CEAP supports <strong>the</strong> bishops in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
opposition to any law which contains<br />
provisions for abortifacient control<br />
<strong>of</strong> birth. Killing <strong>of</strong> human life is<br />
absolutely proscribed. It is prohibited<br />
by <strong>the</strong> Philippine Constitution which<br />
protects life from <strong>the</strong> moment <strong>of</strong><br />
conception. It is also prohibited by<br />
<strong>the</strong> Fifth Commandment.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
103
It supports <strong>the</strong> bishops in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
opposition to any provisions <strong>of</strong><br />
law that force any <strong>Catholic</strong><br />
believer to act against his/her<br />
conscience in <strong>the</strong> discharge <strong>of</strong><br />
his/her duties as a doctor, health<br />
worker, employer or employee.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
104
It supports <strong>the</strong><br />
bishops in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
opposition to any<br />
provision that<br />
usurps <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong><br />
parents to take full<br />
responsibility for<br />
sexual education <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>ir children.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
105
CEAP supports <strong>the</strong> bishops in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
<strong>of</strong>ficial teaching, binding on all believers,<br />
concerning <strong>the</strong> dignity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> human life,<br />
<strong>the</strong> need to “choose life” and to support<br />
a culture <strong>of</strong> life, <strong>the</strong> sacredness <strong>of</strong><br />
sexuality, <strong>the</strong> unity in principle <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> unitive (“for love”) and<br />
procreative (“openness to life”)<br />
finalities <strong>of</strong> acts <strong>of</strong> sexuality,<br />
recognizing God to be <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> life<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
106
Here one must carefully distinguish between:<br />
The authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bishops binding<br />
believers to obedience in faith to a<br />
<strong>Catholic</strong> moral order;<br />
and<br />
The authority <strong>of</strong> discerning reason within<br />
<strong>the</strong> civil (pr<strong>of</strong>ane) society, especially in<br />
discernment articulating demands <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
common good or social justice, binding on<br />
reasonable persons based on compelling<br />
rationality<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
107
“compelling rationality”<br />
Rationality that is based on<br />
discussion and assent, as<br />
enlightened by believers<br />
in a plural society.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
108
PASTOR DIONISIO V. AUSTRIA vs. HON. NATIONAL<br />
LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION et. al. (G.R. No.<br />
124382, August 16, 1999)<br />
CONCEPT OF<br />
SEPARATION OF<br />
CHURCH AND<br />
STATE<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
109
IS THIS AN ISSUE<br />
WHICH THE COURTS<br />
MAY RULE UPON?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
110
The rationale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> principle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
separation <strong>of</strong> church and state is<br />
summed up in <strong>the</strong> familiar saying,<br />
"STRONG FENCES MAKE<br />
GOOD-NEIGHBORS.“<br />
• delineate <strong>the</strong> boundaries between <strong>the</strong><br />
two institutions<br />
• avoid encroachments by one against<br />
<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r because <strong>of</strong> a<br />
misunderstanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
respective exclusive ASSEMBLY 083012 jurisdictions.<br />
111
The demarcation line calls on <strong>the</strong> entities<br />
to "render <strong>the</strong>refore unto Ceasar <strong>the</strong><br />
things that are Ceasar's and unto God <strong>the</strong><br />
things that are God's." 19<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
112
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
While <strong>the</strong> state is<br />
prohibited from<br />
interfering in<br />
purely<br />
ecclesiastical<br />
affairs, <strong>the</strong><br />
Church is likewise<br />
barred from<br />
meddling in<br />
purely secular<br />
matters.<br />
113
THUS, THE SUPREME COURT HAS<br />
GENERALLY RULED THAT THE<br />
COURTS HAVE NO JURISDICTION<br />
OVER MATTERS WHICH ARE<br />
ECCLESIASTICAL IN NATURE.<br />
BUT WHERE THE ISSUE PERTAINS TO<br />
MATTERS WHICH ARE SECULAR IN<br />
NATURE, THEN THE COURTS WILL<br />
GENERALLY HAVE JURISDICTION.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
114
an ecclesiastical<br />
affair involves <strong>the</strong><br />
relationship<br />
between <strong>the</strong> church<br />
and its members<br />
and relate to<br />
matters <strong>of</strong> faith,<br />
religious doctrines,<br />
worship and<br />
governance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
congregation.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
115
To be concrete, examples <strong>of</strong> this socalled<br />
ecclesiastical affairs to which <strong>the</strong><br />
State CANNOT meddle in are:<br />
proceedings for excommunication;<br />
ordinations <strong>of</strong> religious ministers;<br />
administration <strong>of</strong> sacraments;<br />
and o<strong>the</strong>r activities with attached<br />
religious significance.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
116
While <strong>the</strong> matter at hand relates to<br />
<strong>the</strong> church and its religious<br />
minister (TERMINATION OF<br />
PASTOR AUSTRIA), it does<br />
not ipso facto give <strong>the</strong> case a<br />
religious significance.<br />
Simply stated, what is involved<br />
here is <strong>the</strong> relationship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
church as an employer and <strong>the</strong><br />
minister as an employee. It is<br />
purely secular and has no relation<br />
whatsoever with <strong>the</strong> practice <strong>of</strong><br />
faith, worship or doctrines <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
church.<br />
117<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012
In this case, petitioner was not excommunicated<br />
or expelled from <strong>the</strong><br />
membership <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SDA but was<br />
terminated from employment.<br />
Indeed, <strong>the</strong> matter <strong>of</strong> terminating<br />
an employee, which is purely<br />
secular in nature, is different from<br />
<strong>the</strong> ecclesiastical act <strong>of</strong> expelling a<br />
member from <strong>the</strong> religious<br />
congregation.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
118
IN AN EXAMPLE WHERE A PROFESSOR<br />
IN A CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OR<br />
SCHOOL WERE TO TAKE A PERSONAL<br />
POSITION NOT IN CONFORMITY WITH<br />
THE CHURCH POSITION –<br />
“TEACHING” (ACADEMIC<br />
FREEDOM) VS. “OPINION”<br />
(FREEDOM OF SPEECH)<br />
“IN CLASSROOM”<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
119
DISTINGUISH FINE LINES<br />
BETWEEN:<br />
• PROFESSOR OF THEOLOGY VS<br />
PROFESSOR OF SOCIAL SCIENCE<br />
• THE ATENEO PROFESSOR ACTING AS<br />
A TEACHER OR AS AN INDIVIDUAL<br />
• LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR<br />
DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
120
“CONDUCT THAT RENDERS<br />
THE TEACHER UNFIT TO<br />
TEACH IN A CATHOLIC<br />
UNIVERSITY”<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
121
VALID TERMINATION<br />
JUST OR<br />
AUTHORIZED<br />
CAUSES (Art.<br />
282, Labor Code)<br />
ACLEX MCLE LABOR UPDATES<br />
20 JULY 2012<br />
122
SERIOUS MISCONDUCT<br />
- defined as IMPROPER OR WRONG<br />
CONDUCT, a transgression <strong>of</strong> a<br />
definite rule <strong>of</strong> action, a forbidden act<br />
or dereliction <strong>of</strong> duty which is willful in<br />
character and implies wrongful intent,<br />
and not mere error in judgment.<br />
ACLEX MCLE LABOR UPDATES<br />
20 JULY 2012<br />
123
- For misconduct or improper<br />
behavior to be a just cause for<br />
dismissal, <strong>the</strong> same must be<br />
related to <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> employee’s duties and<br />
must show that he has become<br />
unfit to continue working for <strong>the</strong><br />
employer. (Molato vs. NLRC)<br />
ACLEX MCLE LABOR UPDATES<br />
20 JULY 2012<br />
124
Elements:<br />
GROSS INSUBORDINATION<br />
(a) employee’s assailed conduct must be willful or<br />
intentional;<br />
(b) willfulness characterized by wrongful or<br />
perverse attitude;<br />
(c) <strong>the</strong> order violated must be reasonable, lawful<br />
and made known to <strong>the</strong> employee; and<br />
(d) <strong>the</strong> order must pertain to <strong>the</strong> duties which <strong>the</strong><br />
employee has been engaged to discharge. (Aguilar<br />
vs. NLRC; Stolt Nielson vs. NLRC; contra: Manebo vs.<br />
NLRC;)<br />
ACLEX MCLE LABOR<br />
UPDATES 20 JULY 2012<br />
125
WEARING THE HIJAB<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
126
Philippine school bans Muslim hijab<br />
Agence France-Presse1:01 pm | Sunday, August 5th, 2012<br />
ZAMBOANGA, <strong>Philippines</strong> – A <strong>Catholic</strong>-run school in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />
<strong>Philippines</strong> has caused controversy by banning Muslim students from<br />
wearing <strong>the</strong> hijab headscarf.<br />
Mehol Sadain, who heads <strong>the</strong> National Commission on Muslim Filipinos,<br />
said Sunday he had written to Pilar College in <strong>the</strong> mixed Muslim-Christian<br />
port city <strong>of</strong> Zamboanga to demand it reverse its policy.<br />
While <strong>the</strong> school was right to claim it could exercise academic freedom,<br />
Sadain said it should do so with “justice and fair play”.<br />
“Pilar College should realize that while educational institutions can<br />
formulate <strong>the</strong>ir own policies, <strong>the</strong> same should not run counter to existing<br />
laws and state policies,” Sadain said.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
127
MATRIX IN THE CONTEXT OF<br />
ACADEMIC FREEDOM<br />
THE INSTITUTION<br />
VS<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
THE STUDENT<br />
128
ENROLMENT CONTRACT,<br />
WHICH PRESUMES A<br />
MEETING OF THE MINDS<br />
RIGHT OF THE SCHOOL TO EXERCISE<br />
ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND IMPOSE<br />
RULES AND REGULATIONS<br />
-Balanced against –<br />
STUDENT AS A FILIPINO CITIZEN<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
129
BALANCE THE CONFLICTING<br />
INTERESTS IN THE CONTEXT OF<br />
THE EXISTING CIRCUMSTANCES<br />
• PLACE vis-à-vis students<br />
enrolled<br />
• student market<br />
• cultural sensitivities<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
130
“Let faith dialogue with reason,<br />
and reason with faith.<br />
Because faith is reasonable,<br />
and reason leads us to faith.” -<br />
Monsignor Gerry Santos, quoting Pope Benedict.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
131
STUDENT INFRACTIONS<br />
ARISING FROM<br />
INTERNET AND MEDIA<br />
INFLUENCE ON STUDENT<br />
BEHAVIOR<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
132
• Cyber-bullying through<br />
Facebook and Multiply<br />
site use<br />
• US trends in media-<br />
influenced errant<br />
behavior <strong>of</strong> students<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
133
Ms. Emily Abrera<br />
President, Harrison<br />
Communications<br />
Chairman Emeritus,<br />
McCann Worldgroups<br />
Major Conference Session<br />
Jesuit Basic Education<br />
Sesquicentennial Congress<br />
July 13, 2009, Ateneo de Manila<br />
University<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
134
“There is a clear emergence and prominence <strong>of</strong><br />
technology-related activities like usage <strong>of</strong> cellphone<br />
and internet… The use <strong>of</strong> virtual technology seems<br />
more <strong>the</strong> exclusive territory <strong>of</strong> teens and 20somethings.<br />
They are watching less TV, listening to less<br />
radio, and also reading less. They are doing<br />
less sports, interacting face-to-face with<br />
friends less frequently, and spending less<br />
money on traditional consumer items… thanks<br />
to text messaging and <strong>the</strong> internet.<br />
More and more, <strong>the</strong>ir lives are being lived<br />
out virtually.”<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
135
Youth Activities Comparison: 2000 vs. 2005<br />
The growing popularity <strong>of</strong> activities related to “virtual” connectivity.<br />
Activities After School (%)<br />
Base: Total Respondents<br />
2000<br />
2005<br />
Playing Computer/Video Games 10 33<br />
Text Messaging 12 33<br />
Email/Surf/Chat on <strong>the</strong> Net 11 25<br />
Usual Leisure Activities (%)<br />
2000 2005<br />
Window Shopping 22 36<br />
Text Messaging 12 40<br />
Playing Computer/Video Games 17 38<br />
Email/Surf/Chat on <strong>the</strong> Net 13 27<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”
In 2009, a joint study was<br />
launched by Yahoo! and<br />
Nielsen to ga<strong>the</strong>r a baseline<br />
understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Filipino<br />
internet user, and this has been<br />
updated every year to present,<br />
to determine <strong>the</strong> shifts in user<br />
behavior and evolving<br />
preferences.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
137
Among <strong>the</strong> highlights in<br />
<strong>the</strong> Digital <strong>Philippines</strong><br />
2011 Yahoo-Nielsen<br />
Net Index are as<br />
follows:<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
138
There is increased time spent online<br />
across mediums and locations, viz.,<br />
home, school, work, and internet cafes.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
139
There are more households with<br />
internet access from 27% in 2009<br />
to 35% in 2011, <strong>the</strong>reby resulting in a<br />
declining shift in internet café access<br />
from 71% in 2009 to 66% in 2011.<br />
This also means that people are<br />
preferring more private access to <strong>the</strong><br />
internet, ra<strong>the</strong>r than shared access.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
140
Online social networks<br />
present a new and growing<br />
environment wherein people<br />
exchange social information<br />
and manage impressions<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
141
SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES<br />
Facebook/multiply/hi-5 are free-access<br />
social networking website that is operated and privately<br />
owned by different companies.<br />
Users can join networks organized by city,<br />
workplace, school, and region to connect<br />
and interact with o<strong>the</strong>r people.<br />
People can also add friends, or friends <strong>of</strong><br />
friends; send <strong>the</strong>m messages, and update<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir personal pr<strong>of</strong>iles to notify friends about<br />
<strong>the</strong>mselves.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
142
Out <strong>of</strong> a total 101 Million<br />
population, 33% or approximately<br />
33.6 Million are internet users.<br />
Of <strong>the</strong>se internet users as <strong>of</strong> 31 March<br />
2012, 27.7 Million are Facebook<br />
users or a 27% penetration among<br />
<strong>the</strong> total population.<br />
http://www.internetworldstats.com/asia.htm<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
143
MAJOR SOURCES<br />
OF INFORMATION<br />
AND COMMUNICATION<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
144
what<br />
good<br />
bad<br />
• MOBILE PHONES<br />
• Keeping in touch; sms and photos<br />
• Good for emergency<br />
• Sending nasty text messages (SEXTING)<br />
• Taking/sharing nasty pictures or videos<br />
Source content:<br />
http://www.brent.edu.ph/newsletter/pdf/Resposible_Use_<strong>of</strong>_Technology_and_Cyberbullying.pdf<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
145
what<br />
good<br />
bad<br />
• SOCIAL NETWORK SITES<br />
• Socializing with friends and making new ones in<br />
<strong>the</strong> online virtual community<br />
• Allowing young people to be creative<br />
• Sending nasty text messages; sharing <strong>of</strong> nasty<br />
pictures or videos<br />
• Ganging up on someone; making friends under<br />
false pretenses; hacking onto personal website<br />
account<br />
Source content:<br />
http://www.brent.edu.ph/newsletter/pdf/Resposible_Use_<strong>of</strong>_Technology_and_Cyberbullying.pdf<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
146
what<br />
good<br />
bad<br />
• INSTANT MESSAGING (Yahoo etc)<br />
• Text or voice chatting live with friends online<br />
• Quick effective way to keep in touch while<br />
working on <strong>the</strong> computer<br />
• Sending nasty text messages<br />
• Using someone else’s account (hacking) and<br />
forwarding to o<strong>the</strong>rs; making friends under false<br />
pretenses; hacking onto personal website<br />
account<br />
Source content:<br />
http://www.brent.edu.ph/newsletter/pdf/Resposible_Use_<strong>of</strong>_Technology_and_Cyberbullying.pdf<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
147
what<br />
good<br />
bad<br />
• CHAT ROOMS AND BOARD MESSAGES<br />
• Groups <strong>of</strong> people text or voice chat about<br />
common interests<br />
• Easy way to get to know new people and talk<br />
about issues <strong>the</strong>y are too shy to talk about in<br />
person<br />
• Sending nasty or anonymous messages;<br />
groups <strong>of</strong> people ganging up on someone<br />
• Making friends under false pretenses, making<br />
use <strong>of</strong> personal information for blackmail or<br />
o<strong>the</strong>r purposes<br />
Source content:<br />
http://www.brent.edu.ph/newsletter/pdf/Resposible_Use_<strong>of</strong>_Technology_and_Cyberbullying.pdf<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
148
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
149
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
150
Youth Value Systems<br />
Using <strong>the</strong> ‘sealed envelope technique,” respondents<br />
were shown a battery <strong>of</strong> different activities that were<br />
conventionally labeled as wrong, and were asked 2<br />
things:<br />
Personal View<br />
Society’s View<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
Which ones are right and<br />
wrong?<br />
Which ones are acceptable to<br />
society?<br />
151
What’s wrong, what’s right?<br />
Across all activities covered in <strong>the</strong> study, only <strong>the</strong><br />
use <strong>of</strong> illegal drugs and, to a certain extent,<br />
cheating on one’s boyfriend or girlfriend are<br />
considered wrong by <strong>the</strong> greater majority.<br />
Only about 6 out <strong>of</strong> 10 consider <strong>the</strong>se wrong:<br />
taking something without paying, use <strong>of</strong><br />
violence, drugs, drunk driving, suicide,<br />
marital infidelity, and casual sex.<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box: 2006<br />
Intergeneration Study”<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
152
What’s wrong, what’s right?<br />
About half think that pre-marital sex, sex<br />
on TV, phone/internet sex, porn, and<br />
sexually explicit language are wrong.<br />
Less than half think that abortion,<br />
divorce/separation, violence on TV, paying<br />
for sex, and gay relationships are wrong.<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box: 2006<br />
Intergeneration Study”<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
153
Youth’s Value Systems<br />
Trends: 2000 to 2005<br />
Examining <strong>the</strong> data by region,<br />
however, we see stark trends…<br />
With <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> Balance Luzon,<br />
teens have shifted <strong>the</strong>ir personal<br />
definitions <strong>of</strong> right and wrong –<br />
becoming more tolerant <strong>of</strong> many<br />
behaviors.<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
154
Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />
(Metro Manila)<br />
Use forbidden drugs<br />
Cheat on boyfriend/girlfriend<br />
Sell or buy illegal drugs<br />
Take something w/o paying<br />
Sell oneself for sex<br />
Stay away from school/work<br />
Drunk driving<br />
Avoid paying taxes<br />
Marital infidelity<br />
Divorce/separation<br />
Look at porn material<br />
Hazing<br />
Cheat in school<br />
Use violence<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
2005<br />
2000<br />
1992
Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />
(Metro Manila)<br />
Smoke cigarettes<br />
Use sexually explicit language<br />
Sell porn material<br />
Pre-marital sex<br />
Gambling<br />
Phone/internet sex<br />
Getting drunk<br />
Race a car or motorbike<br />
Abortion<br />
Homosexual relationship<br />
Use a prostitute<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
2005<br />
2000<br />
1992
Mindanao teens remain <strong>the</strong><br />
“liberals” compared to those<br />
from o<strong>the</strong>r regions…<br />
But even more so in 2005,<br />
especially on matters related<br />
to forbidden drugs,<br />
pornography, cheating and<br />
violence.<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study” 157<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012
Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />
(Mindanao)<br />
Use forbidden drugs<br />
Cheat on boyfriend/girlfriend<br />
Sell or buy illegal drugs<br />
Take something w/o paying<br />
Sell oneself for sex<br />
Stay away from school/work<br />
Drunk driving<br />
Avoid paying taxes<br />
Marital infidelity<br />
Divorce/separation<br />
Look at porn material<br />
Hazing<br />
Cheat in school<br />
Use violence<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
2005<br />
2000
Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />
(Mindanao)<br />
Smoke cigarettes<br />
Use sexually explicit language<br />
Sell porn material<br />
Pre-marital sex<br />
Gambling<br />
Phone/internet sex<br />
Getting<br />
drunk<br />
Race a car or motorbike<br />
Abortion<br />
Homosexual relationship<br />
Use a prostitute<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
Stricter than before<br />
2005<br />
2000
Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />
(Visayas)<br />
Use forbidden drugs<br />
Cheat on boyfriend/girlfriend<br />
Sell or buy illegal drugs<br />
Take something w/o paying<br />
Sell oneself for sex<br />
Stay away from school/work<br />
Drunk driving<br />
Avoid paying taxes<br />
Marital infidelity<br />
Divorce/separation<br />
Look at porn material<br />
Hazing<br />
Cheat in school<br />
Use violence<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
But<br />
stricter<br />
on<br />
selling<br />
oneself<br />
!<br />
2005<br />
2000
Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />
(Visayas)<br />
Smoke cigarettes<br />
Use sexually explicit language<br />
Sell porn material<br />
Pre-marital sex<br />
Gambling<br />
Phone/internet sex<br />
Getting drunk<br />
Race a car or motorbike<br />
Abortion<br />
Homosexual relationship<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
Stricter than before<br />
2005<br />
Use a prostitute 2000<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”
Youth’s Value Systems<br />
Trends: 2000 to 2005<br />
In Balance Luzon, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, we<br />
see a reverse trend:<br />
Youth from this region have become more<br />
stringent when it comes to personal definitions<br />
<strong>of</strong> right and wrong.<br />
Only divorce/separation is considered “more<br />
right” than before.<br />
Gay relationships and pre-marital sex remain in<br />
<strong>the</strong> same levels as five years ago.<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
162
Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />
(Balance Luzon)<br />
Use forbidden drugs<br />
Cheat on boyfriend/girlfriend<br />
Sell or buy illegal drugs<br />
Take something w/o paying<br />
Sell oneself for sex<br />
Stay away from school/work<br />
Drunk driving<br />
Avoid paying taxes<br />
Marital infidelity<br />
Divorce/separation<br />
Look at porn material<br />
Hazing<br />
Cheat in school<br />
Use violence<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
2005<br />
2000
Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />
(Balance Luzon)<br />
Smoke cigarettes<br />
Use sexually explicit language<br />
Sell porn material<br />
Pre-marital sex<br />
Gambling<br />
Phone/internet sex<br />
Getting drunk<br />
Race a car or motorbike<br />
Abortion<br />
Homosexual relationship<br />
Use a prostitute<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />
2005<br />
2000
Youth’s Value Systems<br />
Regional Differences<br />
With o<strong>the</strong>r regions (particularly Metro<br />
Manila and Mindanao) having shifted<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir stand on various acts from<br />
“wrong” to “less wrong” or “almost<br />
ok”…<br />
…it seems Balance Luzon has emerged<br />
as <strong>the</strong> region <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country’s most<br />
conservative teens.<br />
Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />
2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
165
NEW CASES: USUAL SCENARIOS<br />
• a girlfriend in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philippines</strong> exposes her<br />
breasts online to her boyfriend and is<br />
captured on-cam. Sexy pictures are uploaded<br />
after she splits with boyfriend<br />
• downloading sexy pictures or x-rated<br />
movies, and inserting photo <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />
person using Photoshop<br />
• conversations in private chat rooms or<br />
email correspondences in yahoogroups<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
166
CYBER-BULLYING<br />
Source: http://www.stopcyberbullying.org/what_is_cyberbullying_exactly.html<br />
"Cyberbullying" is when<br />
a child, preteen or teen<br />
is tormented,<br />
threatened, harassed,<br />
humiliated, embarrassed<br />
or o<strong>the</strong>rwise targeted by<br />
ano<strong>the</strong>r child, preteen or<br />
teen using <strong>the</strong> Internet,<br />
interactive and digital<br />
technologies or mobile<br />
phones.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
167
It has to have a minor on both sides, or at<br />
least have been instigated by a minor<br />
against ano<strong>the</strong>r minor or ano<strong>the</strong>r person.<br />
Once adults become involved, it is plain<br />
and simple cyber-harassment or<br />
cyberstalking.<br />
Adult cyber-harassment or cyberstalking<br />
is NEVER called cyberbullying.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
168
COMMON FORMS OF<br />
CYBERBULLYING<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
169
Fake multiply or facebook site<br />
with <strong>the</strong> maligned person as<br />
alleged site owner. Anonymous<br />
bully writes down nasty or<br />
malicious statements under <strong>the</strong><br />
assumed name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> victim<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
170
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
GOSSIP-GIRL<br />
SYNDROME,<br />
where anonymous<br />
text messages about<br />
<strong>the</strong> victim, true or<br />
false, are circulated<br />
to <strong>the</strong> network to<br />
instigate o<strong>the</strong>rs to<br />
gang up on <strong>the</strong><br />
target, or are<br />
directly sent to <strong>the</strong><br />
victim, to hurt or<br />
embarrass him/her<br />
171
Using on-line sites or yahoogroups<br />
to defame ano<strong>the</strong>r, or threaten to<br />
defame <strong>the</strong>m if <strong>the</strong> victim would not<br />
give in to <strong>the</strong>ir whims and wishes.<br />
Threatened uploading <strong>of</strong> private<br />
messages, emails and/or photos as a<br />
means to solicit sexual favors<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
172
Cyberbulling can also occur when:<br />
• Students start maliciously posting<br />
mobile phone photos <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir victims or<br />
teachers on <strong>the</strong> Internet,<br />
• setting up a web page under assumed<br />
name (<strong>the</strong> victim) or about <strong>the</strong>ir victim or<br />
teacher on a social networking site<br />
• posing online as <strong>the</strong> victim in chat<br />
rooms<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
173
WHY CYBER BULLY?<br />
When teens are brought to <strong>the</strong> point<br />
<strong>of</strong> intense anger, need for revenge or<br />
tear-inducing frustration, no one can<br />
predict what <strong>the</strong>y will do. Most cyber<br />
bullying though not only stems from<br />
<strong>the</strong>se but also because <strong>the</strong>y want to<br />
become entertained or <strong>the</strong>y’re very<br />
bored and have too much time on<br />
<strong>the</strong>ir hands.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
174
According to a survey by <strong>the</strong> Cyberbullying<br />
Research Center (www. cyberbullying.us), about<br />
20 percent <strong>of</strong> students age 11 to 18<br />
surveyed last year said <strong>the</strong>y'd been<br />
cyberbullied at some point in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />
lives. In <strong>the</strong> past year, a million<br />
children were victims <strong>of</strong><br />
cyberbullying on Facebook. (Jaser<br />
Marasigan, “The Writing on <strong>the</strong> FAcebook wall”, Manila<br />
Bulletin 31 Aug 2011. http://mb.com.ph/node/332636/<strong>the</strong>writing-facebook-wall)<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
175
PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES<br />
OF CYBERBULLYING:<br />
• fear, anxiety, restlessness.<br />
• damage to <strong>the</strong> victim’s welfare<br />
and physical well-being,<br />
• low esteem and lacking in self-<br />
confidence which may eventually<br />
damage <strong>the</strong>ir social worth.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
176
Although <strong>the</strong>re are no reported<br />
deaths or suicides yet in <strong>the</strong><br />
<strong>Philippines</strong> that have been<br />
linked to cyberbullying, <strong>the</strong>re<br />
are numerous instances <strong>of</strong><br />
reported suicides on account<br />
<strong>of</strong> cyberbullying in <strong>the</strong> United<br />
States<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
177
This is <strong>the</strong> story <strong>of</strong> JAMEY<br />
RODEMEYER <strong>of</strong> Buffalo, New York.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
178
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
179
NULLUM CRIMEN,<br />
SINE LEGE.<br />
There is no crime<br />
where <strong>the</strong>re is no law.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
180
We still do not have a law on cyber<br />
stalking or cyber bullying.<br />
What we presently have is<br />
Republic Act No. 8792, or <strong>the</strong> E-<br />
Commerce Act, which does not<br />
fully address <strong>the</strong> ramifications and<br />
concerns on cyberbullying<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
181
The Senate Committee has so far<br />
drafted SENATE BILL 2796,<br />
entitled <strong>the</strong> “CYBERCRIME<br />
PREVENTION ACT OF<br />
2011,” sponsored by Senator<br />
Edgardo Angara.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
182
Senator Miriam Defensor- Santiago had<br />
filed SENATE BILL NO. 2677, OR<br />
THE ANTI-BULLYING SCHOOL<br />
POLICY ACT, which would require<br />
schools to create concrete policies to<br />
address <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> bullying,<br />
particularly those involving <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong> Internet and digital I technologies<br />
such as cellphones and computers, and<br />
to subject <strong>of</strong>fending students and<br />
minors to disciplinary actions<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
183
WHAT CAN BE DONE?<br />
The School may promulgate a<br />
specific “anti-bullying policy”<br />
and undertake an information<br />
campaign aimed at letting<br />
kids know that bullying and<br />
cyberbullying are prohibited<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
184
• Tell students to think before<br />
<strong>the</strong>y post any message and to<br />
be nice online.<br />
• If <strong>the</strong> student has been cyber-<br />
bullied or has witnessed one,<br />
direct him NOT to retaliate<br />
and to immediately report <strong>the</strong><br />
bad behavior to his parents<br />
or teachers<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
185
• Tell students never pass<br />
along harmful or cruel<br />
messages or images. Train<br />
students to delete<br />
suspicious email messages<br />
without opening <strong>the</strong>m.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
186
• Ask students to step up to<br />
friends who are<br />
cyberbullying and tell <strong>the</strong>m<br />
to stop.<br />
• Teach students how to use<br />
technology to block<br />
communication with<br />
cyberbullies.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
187
At home, supervise your<br />
child’s time online. Putting<br />
<strong>the</strong> computer in a common<br />
area, such as <strong>the</strong> kitchen,<br />
is a good idea.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
188
Addressing cyberbullying<br />
school-wide is key -- help<br />
institute a formal policy for<br />
dealing with any cyberbullying<br />
instances. Be sure students<br />
fully understand <strong>the</strong><br />
consequences.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
189
Teach students <strong>the</strong> basics <strong>of</strong><br />
smart and savvy Web behavior,<br />
such as never revealing<br />
passwords or real last names.<br />
Pay attention. If you notice a<br />
student is withdrawn, depressed<br />
or reluctant to attend school or<br />
social events, investigate.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
190
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
191
TAX EXEMPTION<br />
a grant <strong>of</strong> immunity, express<br />
or implied to particular<br />
persons or corporations<br />
from <strong>the</strong> obligation to pay<br />
taxes. (51 Am. Jur. 503)<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
192
EDUCATION AS VIEWED BY THE<br />
CONSTITUTION<br />
Art. III, Sec. 17. The State shall give priority to<br />
education, science and technology, arts, culture,<br />
and sports to foster patriotism and nationalism,<br />
accelerate social progress, and promote total<br />
human liberation and development.<br />
Art. XIV, Sec. 1. The State shall protect and<br />
promote <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> all citizens to quality<br />
education at all levels and shall take appropriate<br />
steps to make such education accessible to all<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
193
STATE’S RECOGNITION OF THE<br />
COMPLEMENTARY ROLES OF PUBLIC AND<br />
PRIVATE INSTITUTION IN THE REALM OF<br />
EDUCATION<br />
B.P 232, Sec. 41. The government, in recognition <strong>of</strong><br />
<strong>the</strong>ir complementary role in <strong>the</strong> educational system,<br />
may provide aid to <strong>the</strong> programs <strong>of</strong> private schools in<br />
<strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> grants or scholarships, or loans from<br />
government financial institutions: Provided, That<br />
such programs meet certain defined educational<br />
requirements and standards and contribute to <strong>the</strong><br />
attainment <strong>of</strong> national development goals.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
194
STATE SUBSIDY<br />
BY WAY OF TAX EXEMPTION<br />
• TAX EXEMPTION FROM REAL OR<br />
PROPERTY TAXES<br />
• TAX EXEMPTION FROM INTERNAL<br />
REVENUE TAXES AND CUSTOM DUTIES<br />
• EXEMPTION FROM TAXES IMPOSED ON<br />
GIFTS AND DONATIONS<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
195
PROVIDED THAT THE LAND,<br />
INCOME OR DONATION IS USED<br />
ACTUALLY, DIRECTLY,<br />
AND EXCLUSIVELY FOR<br />
EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
196
SITUATION:<br />
Sale <strong>of</strong> real property owned by<br />
<strong>the</strong> educational institution<br />
This is subject to transfer tax and<br />
documentary stamp tax, inasmuch as<br />
this is an activity which is not related to<br />
education but is assumed to be done<br />
for pr<strong>of</strong>it.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
197
SITUATION:<br />
SCHOOL WITH A CANTEEN.<br />
HOW IS IT TO BE TAXED?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
198
If <strong>the</strong> school canteen is actually operated<br />
by <strong>the</strong> school as a laboratory for its<br />
culinary arts students, or incidental to its<br />
operation as an educational institution,<br />
<strong>the</strong>n any pr<strong>of</strong>it derived from sales <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
products in <strong>the</strong> canteen is tax exempt<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
199
HOWEVER, if <strong>the</strong> school canteen is operated<br />
by a concessionaire who pays rent or a<br />
percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gross pr<strong>of</strong>it for <strong>the</strong><br />
use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> premises to <strong>the</strong> School or for<br />
<strong>the</strong> privilege <strong>of</strong> operating <strong>the</strong> canteen within<br />
school premises, <strong>the</strong>n this is NOT<br />
considered by <strong>the</strong> BIR as tax-exempt.<br />
The Bureau <strong>of</strong> Internal Revenue/Dept <strong>of</strong><br />
Finance argue that <strong>the</strong> activity (rental <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />
school canteen) is NOT related to <strong>the</strong><br />
educational purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> School.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
200
BIR Rev Memo Circular No. 76-2003<br />
dtd 14 Nov 2003:<br />
REGULAR SCHOOL INCOME SUCH<br />
AS BOOKSTORES AND CANTEENS<br />
ARE EXEMPT, PROVIDED THAT<br />
THEY ARE OWNED AND OPERATED<br />
BY THE SCHOOL AND LOCATED IN<br />
THE SAME PREMISES.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
201
The government does not exempt<br />
educational institutions from paying<br />
local taxes or impositions such as<br />
Mayor’s permits or o<strong>the</strong>r license fees,<br />
stating that <strong>the</strong>se are not taxes but are<br />
regulatory fees in nature. Moreover, it is<br />
noted that local governments have<br />
different ordinances, not <strong>the</strong> least <strong>of</strong><br />
which are <strong>the</strong> Mayor’s and/or business<br />
permits. Sarmiento, Ulpiano. supra., at 854.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
202
ISSUE:<br />
WHAT IF THE PROFITS OF THE<br />
CANTEEN WERE USED TO<br />
SUBSIDIZE SCHOLARSHIPS?<br />
SUBSIDIZE HOSPITALIZATION<br />
EXPENSES FOR NUNS AND<br />
EMPLOYEES?<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
203
PROVE THAT THE PROCEEDS WERE<br />
USED ACTUALLY, DIRECTLY AND<br />
EXCLUSIVELY FOR EDUCATIONAL<br />
PURPOSES THROUGH PAPER TRAIL<br />
EXAMPLE: RECEIPTS SHOWING THAT<br />
THE PROCEEDS WERE USED FOR THE<br />
SCHOLARSHIP OF X NUMBER OF<br />
STUDENTS; OR FOR THE<br />
HOSPITALIZATION BENEFITS OF THE<br />
NUNS AND THE EMPLOYEES.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
204
CEAP PROPOSAL FOR A<br />
COMPREHENSIVE TAX<br />
EXEMPTION BILL:<br />
Any revenues or income from any activity<br />
undertaken by <strong>the</strong> educational institution,<br />
regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source, should be exempt<br />
from taxes. The reason is that any income<br />
earned by <strong>the</strong> non-stock, non-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />
educational institution ultimately redounds to<br />
<strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> said institution for <strong>the</strong><br />
fur<strong>the</strong>rance <strong>of</strong> its primary objectives.<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
205
FOR FURTHER QUESTIONS:<br />
PLEASE EMAIL OR CALL:<br />
Ada D. Abad<br />
Cell: 0917-526-9732<br />
ada.abad@gmail.com<br />
Ofc: +632-844-0583/<br />
+632-843-8621<br />
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
206
CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />
ASSEMBLY 083012<br />
207