04.07.2013 Views

Download - Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines

Download - Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines

Download - Catholic Educational Association of the Philippines

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

LEGAL ISSUES<br />

AND CONCERNS<br />

AFFECTING<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

PRIVATE<br />

EDUCATION<br />

30 AUGUST 2012<br />

ATTY. ADA D. ABAD<br />

Legal Counsel, CEAP<br />

Former Vice-Dean, Lyceum College <strong>of</strong> Law;<br />

Managing Associate<br />

Antonio H. Abad & Associates Law Office<br />

1


CEAP NATIONAL ASSEMBLY<br />

SM MALL OF ASIA – SMX CONVENTION<br />

30 AUGUST 2012, 11:15A.M. – 1:15 P.M.<br />

SCOPE OF OUR TALK<br />

TODAY:<br />

• K-12 LABOR IMPLICATIONS<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

2


ACADEMIC FREEDOM VS.<br />

FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION OR<br />

FREEDOM OF RELIGION<br />

ATENEO PROFESSORS<br />

WEARING OF HIJAB<br />

• CYBERBULLYING<br />

• TAXATION, DOC STAMPS AND<br />

PERMITS ISSUES<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

3


POSSIBLE ISSUES<br />

FOR TEACHERS<br />

ARISING FROM THE<br />

SHIFT TO K-12:<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

4


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

One <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

main thrusts <strong>of</strong><br />

President<br />

Noynoy’s<br />

administration<br />

is educational<br />

reform through<br />

<strong>the</strong> K-12<br />

program.<br />

5


Under this scheme,<br />

kindergarten is made<br />

compulsory for all children<br />

and an additional two years<br />

<strong>of</strong> senior high school is to<br />

be likewise mandated.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

6


How Do<br />

We Add<br />

<strong>the</strong> Two<br />

Years?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

7


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

8


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

9


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

10


Aside from curriculum<br />

revision, one practical<br />

problem posed to Basic Ed<br />

schools would be <strong>the</strong><br />

logistical issue <strong>of</strong> faculty<br />

movement and resources that<br />

would be required for <strong>the</strong> shift<br />

to <strong>the</strong> K-12 program.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

11


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

12


1. Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> School would<br />

have sufficient resources to<br />

put up a senior high school<br />

facility (Grades 11 and 12),<br />

to add to its present ten-<br />

year basic education<br />

program.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

13


2. Assuming that <strong>the</strong> School<br />

will incorporate <strong>the</strong> senior<br />

high school level (Grades<br />

11 and 12), whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong><br />

School’s present faculty<br />

complement have <strong>the</strong><br />

necessary numbers to<br />

address <strong>the</strong> additional two<br />

(2) years?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

14


3. What are <strong>the</strong> academic<br />

qualifications for teachers<br />

that will be assigned or<br />

hired to teach Grades 11<br />

and 12?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

15


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

16


1. Whe<strong>the</strong>r <strong>the</strong> 4-year or 5-<br />

year academic courses<br />

will be lessened to 3-<br />

years or 4-years<br />

respectively?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

17


1.1 If NO, <strong>the</strong>n two-year period<br />

is simply a transition period<br />

and by academic year<br />

2018-2019, all will go back<br />

to normal<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

18


1.2 IF YES, and 1 st – 2 nd year<br />

subjects moved down to 11 th -<br />

12 th grades, <strong>the</strong>n SOME<br />

faculty movements may<br />

have to become permanent<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

19


2. NEED TO KNOW PARAMETERS<br />

IN THE ENABLING LAW ON<br />

TRANSITION PERIOD,<br />

PARTICULARLY WHETHER<br />

COLLEGE TEACHERS MAY<br />

TEACH GR 11 AND 12 DURING<br />

TWO YEAR TRANSITION<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

20


3. Considering that <strong>the</strong> rates<br />

<strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> college pr<strong>of</strong>essors are<br />

different from that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> basic<br />

elementary teachers, will this<br />

be considered a demotion or a<br />

diminution <strong>of</strong> salaries?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

21


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

22


SCENARIO 1:<br />

BASIC<br />

EDUCATION<br />

SCHOOL DOES<br />

NOT SET UP AN<br />

11 TH AND 12 TH<br />

GRADE; NO<br />

COLLEGE LEVEL<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

23


PARAMETERS OF<br />

SCENARIO 1:<br />

1. K-12 FULLY IMPLEMENTED<br />

2. AY 2016-2017<br />

AY 2017-2018<br />

3. NO COLLEGE LEVEL<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

GRADES 11 TH<br />

AND 12 TH NOT<br />

TO BE SET UP<br />

24


1.1 NO ADDITIONAL<br />

REQUIREMENT FOR<br />

FACULTY AND<br />

HENCE, NO<br />

MOVEMENT<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

25


1.2 SCHOOL GIVES<br />

CERTIFICATE FOR<br />

JUNIOR HIGH SCHOOL,<br />

AND RELEASES TRANSFER<br />

CREDENTIALS FOR JUNIOR<br />

HIGH SCHOOL GRADUATE<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

26


1.3 SCHOOL MAY COME UP<br />

WITH MEMORANDUM OF<br />

AGREEMENT AS FEEDER<br />

SCHOOL TO:<br />

A STAND-ALONE 11-12 TH<br />

GRADE SCHOOL OR<br />

ANOTHER SCHOOL WITH<br />

11-12 TH GRADES OR<br />

CONSORTIUM SENIOR HIGH<br />

SCHOOL CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

27


• NO ADDITIONAL EXPENSES<br />

• NO LOGISTICAL PROBLEM<br />

ON FACULTY MOVEMENT<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

28


• POSSIBILITY THAT SCHOOL<br />

MAY LOSE SOME OF THE HIGH<br />

SCHOOL GR7-10 MARKET AS<br />

PARENTS WOULD WANT<br />

INTEGRATED SENIOR HIGH<br />

SCHOOL<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

29


SCENARIO 2:<br />

BASIC<br />

EDUCATION<br />

SCHOOL WILL<br />

SET UP 11 TH AND<br />

12 TH GRADES; NO<br />

COLLEGE LEVEL<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

30


PARAMETERS OF<br />

SCENARIO 2:<br />

1. K-12 FULLY IMPLEMENTED<br />

2. AY 2016-2017<br />

AY 2017-2018<br />

3. NO COLLEGE LEVEL<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

GRADES 11 TH<br />

AND 12 TH TO BE<br />

SET UP BY<br />

SCHOOL<br />

31


2.1 CHECK WHETHER THE<br />

SCHOOL’S PRESENT<br />

FACULTY COMPLEMENT<br />

HAVE THE NECESSARY<br />

NUMBERS TO ADDRESS<br />

THE ADDITIONAL TWO<br />

(2) YEARS<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

32


2.2 IF PRESENT FACULTY<br />

COMPLEMENT<br />

SUFFICIENT TO<br />

ADDRESS THE 11 TH -12 TH<br />

GRADES REQUIREMENT,<br />

THEN SIMPLY ASSIGN<br />

SUBJECTS TO THEM.<br />

CONSIDER OVERLOAD<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

33


2.3 IF PRESENT FACULTY<br />

COMPLEMENT IS NOT<br />

SUFFICIENT TO<br />

ADDRESS THE 11 TH -12 TH<br />

GRADES REQUIREMENT,<br />

THEN SCHOOL MUST<br />

HIRE NEW FACULTY<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

34


• FACULTY FOR BASIC ED<br />

MUST HAVE PASSED<br />

LICENSURE EXAMINATION<br />

FOR TEACHERS (LET)<br />

• SAME POLICIES AND<br />

REQUIREMENTS FOR<br />

PROBATIONARY FACULTY<br />

• MGMT PREROGATIVE TO<br />

DETERMINE RATES (SAME OR<br />

HIGHER) CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

35


• DUE TO CREATION OF SENIOR<br />

HIGH SCHOOL, STUDENTS CAN<br />

COMPLETE THEIR ENTIRE BASIC<br />

EDUCATION COURSE IN THE<br />

SCHOOL<br />

• POSSIBLY HIGHER ENROLMENT<br />

FROM TRANSFERREES OF<br />

SCHOOLS WITHOUT 11 TH -12 TH GR<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

36


• IF FACULTY IS NOT SUFFICIENT,<br />

SCHOOL MUST HIRE NEW<br />

FACULTY<br />

• ADDITIONAL EXPENSES TO BE<br />

INCURRED FOR FACILITIES<br />

AND FACULTY PAY<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

37


• IF FACULTY IS SUFFICIENT,<br />

LOGISTICAL PROBLEMS ON<br />

FACULTY MOVEMENT,<br />

PRIORITIZATION AS TO<br />

ASSIGNMENTS WILL ARISE<br />

• MINOR ISSUE ON PAY RATE<br />

(TO BE DISCUSSED LATER)<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

38


SCENARIO 3:<br />

BASIC<br />

EDUCATION<br />

SCHOOL WILL<br />

SET UP 11 TH AND<br />

12 TH GRADES;<br />

WITH COLLEGE<br />

LEVEL<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

39


SCENARIO 4:<br />

COLLEGE LEVEL;<br />

WITH OR WITHOUT<br />

BASIC ED SCHOOL<br />

BUT PUTTING UP<br />

11 TH- 12 TH GRADES<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

40


PARAMETERS OF<br />

SCENARIOS 3 & 4:<br />

1. K-12 FULLY IMPLEMENTED<br />

2. AY 2016-2017<br />

AY 2017-2018<br />

NO FIRST YEAR<br />

COLLEGE<br />

STUDENTS<br />

3. WITH BOTH BASIC ED AND COLLEGE<br />

LEVELS; OR PUTTING UP SENIOR HIGH<br />

SCHOOL<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

41


IN SCENARIOS 3 & 4, YOU<br />

HAVE A COLLEGE WHICH WILL<br />

HAVE NO 1 ST YEAR COLLEGE<br />

ENROLLEES FOR ACADEMIC<br />

YEARS 2016-2017 AND 2017-<br />

2018, WHEN THE K-12 IS FULLY<br />

IMPLEMENTED AND 11TH-12TH<br />

GRADES IN TRANSITION<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

42


PROBLEM:<br />

WHAT TO DO WITH<br />

COLLEGE<br />

PROFESSORS IN THE<br />

1 ST AND 2 ND YEAR<br />

LEVELS WHO WILL<br />

NOT HAVE LOAD FOR<br />

TWO YEARS?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

43


ASSIGN GRADE 11-12<br />

SUBJECTS TO<br />

QUALIFIED<br />

PROFESSORS FROM<br />

THE COLLEGE LEVEL<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

44


FROM AMONG EXISTING<br />

COLLEGE FACULTY<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

45


COLLEGE<br />

PROF –<br />

LICENSED<br />

Bed<br />

TEACHER<br />

SORTING HAT<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

COLLEGE<br />

PROF –<br />

WITHOUT<br />

LICENSURE<br />

EXAM; check<br />

also FULL-TIME<br />

AND PART-TIME<br />

46


IF PART-TIME AND HENCE NOT<br />

TENURED, SIMPLY DO NOT<br />

REHIRE OR GIVE<br />

APPOINTMENTS<br />

IF FULL-TIME AND HENCE,<br />

TENURED, THEN SCHOOL IS<br />

INITIALLY UNDER OBLIGATION<br />

TO CHECK ALTERNATIVE<br />

MEASURES<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

47


COLLEGE PROFESSOR<br />

WHO IS ALSO LICENSED<br />

Bed TEACHER<br />

TO BE GIVEN PRIORITY IN<br />

ASSIGNMENT OF 11 TH -12 TH<br />

GRADE SUBJECTS<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

48


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

49


THOSE WHO<br />

ARE WILLING<br />

TO TEACH<br />

GR 11-12<br />

FROM AMONG EXISTING FULL-<br />

TIME COLLEGE FACULTY<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

THOSE WHO<br />

ARE NOT<br />

WILLING TO<br />

TEACH<br />

GR 11-12<br />

50


THOSE WILLING<br />

TO TAKE<br />

LICENSURE<br />

EXAM IN TIME<br />

FOR 2016-2018<br />

FULL-TIME COLLEGE PROF<br />

WILLING TO TEACH GR 11-12<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

ENABLING LAW<br />

ALLOWS<br />

COLLEGE<br />

PROFESSORS TO<br />

TEACH GR11-12<br />

51


ASSIGN TO<br />

RESEARCH<br />

OR ADMIN<br />

WORK FOR<br />

TWO YEARS<br />

FULL-TIME COLLEGE PROF<br />

NOT WILLING OR UNABLE<br />

TO TEACH GR 11-12<br />

AGREE TO<br />

PUT ON<br />

FLOATING<br />

STATUS OR<br />

SABBATICAL<br />

WITHOUT<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

PAY<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

RETRENCH-<br />

MENT OR<br />

REDUNDANCY<br />

OR EARLY<br />

RETIREMENT<br />

52


• EXISTING FACULTY CAN BE<br />

RETAINED, IF ALL AGREE TO<br />

TEACH IN GRADES 11-12<br />

DURING TRANSITION<br />

• HOPEFULLY NO CHANGE IN THE<br />

RATE OF STUDENT ENROLMENT<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

53


• DISARRAY IN THE FACULTY BUILD<br />

UP, IF MOST DO NOT AGREE TO<br />

TEACH GR 11-12<br />

• IN CHOOSING TO HAVE A<br />

COMPROMISE ON RATES AND/ OR<br />

SEPARATION PAY TO FACULTY,<br />

SCHOOLS WILL HAVE TO INCUR<br />

HIGH ADMIN EXPENSES<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

54


SCENARIO 5:<br />

STAND-ALONE<br />

COLLEGE OR<br />

UNIVERSITY<br />

WITHOUT K-12<br />

NO 1 ST AND 2 ND<br />

YEAR STUDENTS<br />

2016-2018<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

55


PARAMETERS OF<br />

SCENARIO 5:<br />

1. K-12 FULLY IMPLEMENTED<br />

2. AY 2016-2017<br />

AY 2017-2018<br />

NO FIRST YEAR<br />

COLLEGE<br />

STUDENTS<br />

3. COLLEGE LEVEL ONLY; NO BASIC EDUC<br />

FEEDER SCHOOL AND WILL NOT PUT UP<br />

SENIOR HIGH SCHOOL<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

56


ASSIGN TO<br />

RESEARCH<br />

OR ADMIN<br />

WORK FOR<br />

TWO YEARS<br />

FULL-TIME COLLEGE PROF<br />

WITHOUT ANY SUBJECT LOAD<br />

FOR TWO YEARS<br />

AGREE TO<br />

PUT ON<br />

FLOATING<br />

STATUS OR<br />

SABBATICAL<br />

WITHOUT<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

PAY<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

RETRENCH-<br />

MENT OR<br />

REDUNDANCY<br />

OR EARLY<br />

RETIREMENT<br />

57


• POSSIBLE TO RETAIN ENTIRE<br />

FACULTY, IF ALL CAN BE<br />

ACCOMMODATED TO ADMIN OR<br />

RESEARCH POSITIONS<br />

• LESS ADMIN COSTS<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

58


• INCUR HIGH EXPENSES ON<br />

SEPARATION PAY AND / OTHER<br />

BENEFITS, IF ALL HAVE TO BE<br />

RETRENCHED OR DECLARED<br />

REDUNDANT<br />

• POSSIBILITY OF CLOSURE OF<br />

SCHOOL / BANKRUPTCY<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

59


ASSIGN OR<br />

SECOND THE<br />

COLLEGE<br />

PROFESSORS<br />

TO THE<br />

CONSORTIUM<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

60


ASSUMPTIONS:<br />

1. Enabling law allows for college<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essors to teach grades 11-<br />

12 during <strong>the</strong> transition<br />

2. School is a member <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

consortium that will put up <strong>the</strong><br />

Senior High School (Gr 11-12)<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

61


ISSUES:<br />

1.WILL THE CONSORTIUM<br />

SCHOOL BE CONSIDERED<br />

A SEPARATE JURIDICAL<br />

ENTITY?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

62


IF NO, THEN:<br />

LOGISTICAL PROBLEM ON HOW<br />

AND WHO WILL HANDLE<br />

FINANCIAL, ADMINISTRATIVE AND<br />

REPORTORIAL REQUIREMENTS OF<br />

THE CONSORTIUM<br />

STANDARDIZATION OF RATES OF<br />

THE PROFESSORS/TEACHERS<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

63


IF YES, THEN :<br />

AFTER TRANSITION PERIOD, WILL THE<br />

COLLEGE PROFESSORS RETURN TO<br />

THEIR BASE SCHOOL?<br />

IF TRANSFER IS PERMANENT, THEN<br />

WHAT HAPPENS TO THE YEARS OF<br />

SERVICE OF THE TRANSFERRED<br />

FACULTY? NOTE THAT ORIGINAL<br />

SCHOOL MUST HAVE SEPARATED THEM<br />

(REDUNDANCY, RETRENCHMENT OR EARLY<br />

RETIREMT)<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

64


FREEZE HIRING<br />

PRIOR TO<br />

2016-2018<br />

• ONLY PART-TIMERS<br />

TO BE HIRED<br />

• PRESENT FACULTY<br />

TO BE PREPARED FOR<br />

TRANSITION<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

65


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

66


Considering that <strong>the</strong> rates <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> college pr<strong>of</strong>essors are<br />

different from that <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

basic elementary teachers,<br />

will this be considered a<br />

demotion or a diminution <strong>of</strong><br />

salaries?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

67


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

68


OPTIONS<br />

1. Same rate as <strong>the</strong> Basic<br />

Education teachers –<br />

possibly diminution <strong>of</strong> salary<br />

and hence, may only be done<br />

with consent <strong>of</strong> faculty<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

69


2. Same rate as <strong>the</strong> College<br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essors – no problem<br />

3. Midway compromise between<br />

college and basic education<br />

rates -- possibly diminution <strong>of</strong><br />

salary and hence, may only be<br />

done with consent <strong>of</strong> faculty<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

70


4. If does not agree to<br />

Options 1 or 3, <strong>the</strong>n:<br />

Retrenchment<br />

Redundancy<br />

Floating Status<br />

Early Retirement<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

71


Generally, this concept applies to<br />

higher educational institution.<br />

However, to a limited extent, this is<br />

applicable to private educational<br />

institutions <strong>of</strong>fering basic education<br />

(elementary and high school levels).<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

72


Origin <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> word<br />

“ACADEMIC” – referring<br />

to <strong>the</strong> garden grove<br />

near Ancient Greece<br />

called “AKADEMEIA,”<br />

where <strong>the</strong> esteemed<br />

philosopher Plato (428-<br />

348 B.C.) held court<br />

and taught a school <strong>of</strong><br />

select students.<br />

O.D. Corpuz, “Academic Freedom in Higher<br />

Education”, Second Lecture, 09 Nov. 1995.<br />

Pr<strong>of</strong>essor Emeritus, University <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Philippines</strong>.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

73


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

• Subjects in Akademeia<br />

essentially concerned <strong>the</strong><br />

search for truth, <strong>the</strong><br />

good, <strong>the</strong> best in life<br />

• Thus, it was natural and<br />

essential in <strong>the</strong> Greek<br />

tradition that <strong>the</strong><br />

“Akademeia” be “free”<br />

from outside<br />

constraints.<br />

74


MATRIX IN THE CONTEXT OF<br />

THE INSTITUTION<br />

ACADEMIC FREEDOM<br />

VS VS<br />

THE TEACHER THE STUDENT<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

75


• who may teach<br />

• what may be taught<br />

• how it shall be taught;<br />

• and who may be admitted to<br />

study. (Garcia vs. The Faculty Admission Committee, Loyola<br />

School <strong>of</strong> Theology, 68 SCRA 277, citing Justice Frankfurter's concurring<br />

opinion in Sweezy v. New Hampshire, 354 US 234, 263 [1957]).<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

76


(1) <strong>the</strong> appointment and tenure <strong>of</strong> <strong>of</strong>fice <strong>of</strong><br />

academic staff; and<br />

(2) <strong>the</strong> curricula for courses <strong>of</strong> study;<br />

(3) <strong>the</strong> admission, examination and<br />

retention <strong>of</strong> students until graduation;<br />

(4) <strong>the</strong> allocation <strong>of</strong> income among <strong>the</strong><br />

different categories <strong>of</strong> expenditure.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

77


WHAT MAY BE<br />

TAUGHT?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

78


Institutions <strong>of</strong> higher learning have<br />

<strong>the</strong> right to determine <strong>the</strong> curricular<br />

program for <strong>the</strong> different courses <strong>of</strong><br />

study in conformity with <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

objectives or mission statements.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

79


POSSIBLE CONFLICTS ON THE<br />

ISSUE OF “WHAT TO TEACH”<br />

Despite curricular autonomy,<br />

academic institutions however may<br />

exercise self-censorship by:<br />

(a) refusing to <strong>of</strong>fer subjects which<br />

are contradictory to its vision-<br />

mission-goals;<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

80


(b) exercising supervisory powers by<br />

restricting teachers from discussing<br />

matters contradictory to vision-<br />

mission-goals;<br />

(c) imposing disciplinary sanctions<br />

upon teachers who teach<br />

controversial positions on matters<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> ambit <strong>of</strong> his/her subject<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

81


IN A SECULAR CONTEXT, LOOK AT<br />

THESE ISSUES IN THE UNITED<br />

STATES:<br />

In USA Patriot Act [Uniting (and) Streng<strong>the</strong>ning<br />

America (by) Providing Appropriate Tools Required (to)<br />

Intercept (and) Obstruct Terrorism Act <strong>of</strong> 2001] arising from<br />

<strong>the</strong> 9-11 World Trade bombing, allowing <strong>the</strong> FBI to<br />

intercept mails and correspondences from<br />

suspected terrorists, vis-à-vis freedom <strong>of</strong><br />

expression.<br />

Is this an indication that a scenario similar to that depicted<br />

in <strong>the</strong> movie “MINORITY REPORT” and concept <strong>of</strong> PRE-<br />

CRIME, may happen in <strong>the</strong> near future?<br />

82<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

possible<br />

censorship <strong>of</strong><br />

educational<br />

engineering<br />

websites which<br />

outline procedure<br />

to make a bomb, as<br />

what happened in<br />

Columbine high<br />

school.<br />

83


Keyishian vs. Board <strong>of</strong> Regents case<br />

where mere knowing membership in an<br />

organization which espouses and<br />

advocates violent overthrow <strong>of</strong> civil<br />

government, is not sufficient for<br />

termination <strong>of</strong> faculty member.<br />

There must exist ACTIVE and SPECIFIC<br />

intent on part <strong>of</strong> faculty member to<br />

advocate and teach <strong>the</strong> same to students<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

84


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

Greek katholikos<br />

universal,<br />

general,<br />

from katholou in<br />

general,<br />

from kata by<br />

+ holos whole —<br />

more at CATA-, SAFE<br />

85


If <strong>the</strong> essence <strong>of</strong> a university is <strong>the</strong> unbridled<br />

freedom <strong>of</strong> thought and expression,<br />

in juxtaposition with <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> schools run<br />

by congregations to limit <strong>the</strong>ir curriculum to<br />

conform with <strong>the</strong>ir vision-mission-goals,<br />

is <strong>the</strong>re really such a thing as a<br />

“<strong>Catholic</strong> University?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

86


Freedom <strong>of</strong> thought<br />

and expression<br />

vis-a-vis<br />

<strong>Catholic</strong> doctrines <strong>of</strong><br />

faith.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

87


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

88


Reproductive health and<br />

population control through<br />

artificial contraception<br />

higher sciences’<br />

experimentations on cloning<br />

<strong>of</strong> human beings and artificial<br />

insemination<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

89


HOW IT MAY<br />

BE TAUGHT?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

90


Academic freedom means that <strong>the</strong> teacher is<br />

entitled to full freedom in:<br />

"(a) research and in <strong>the</strong> publication <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> results, subject to <strong>the</strong> adequate<br />

performance <strong>of</strong> his o<strong>the</strong>r academic duties;<br />

(b) discussing his subject in <strong>the</strong><br />

classroom, but he should be careful not to<br />

introduce into his teaching controversial<br />

matter which has no relation to his subject;<br />

(c) The college or university teacher is a<br />

citizen, a member <strong>of</strong> a learned pr<strong>of</strong>ession,<br />

and an <strong>of</strong>ficer in an educational institution.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

91


Academic freedom also includes <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

faculty to freely express opinions based on<br />

bodies <strong>of</strong> evidence, research or systematic thought<br />

and inquiry. The opinions expressed might<br />

impeach or overturn conventional propositions or<br />

even challenge established doctrines --- without<br />

risk to <strong>the</strong>ir jobs, promotion and careers.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

92


Academic freedom implies a<br />

corresponding academic<br />

responsibility. The American Civil Liberties Union <strong>of</strong><br />

New York (in re: Academic Freedom and Academic Responsibility,<br />

New York ACLU 1953)<br />

The teacher plays two distinct roles: (a)<br />

as a pr<strong>of</strong>essor, which entails his<br />

conduct in teaching and o<strong>the</strong>r activities<br />

directly related to pr<strong>of</strong>essional<br />

responsibilities; and (b) as a citizen.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

93


(1) A School may not impose any limitation<br />

upon <strong>the</strong> teacher’s freedom in <strong>the</strong><br />

exposition <strong>of</strong> his own subject in <strong>the</strong><br />

classroom or in addresses and publications<br />

outside <strong>the</strong> college, except ins<strong>of</strong>ar as:<br />

(a) <strong>the</strong> general necessity <strong>of</strong> adapting all<br />

instruction to <strong>the</strong> needs <strong>of</strong> immature<br />

students; or<br />

(b) in <strong>the</strong> case <strong>of</strong> institutions <strong>of</strong><br />

denominational or partisan character,<br />

specific stipulations in advance, fully<br />

understood and accepted by both parties<br />

limit <strong>the</strong> scope and character <strong>of</strong> instruction.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

94


(2) No teacher may claim as his right<br />

<strong>the</strong> privilege <strong>of</strong> discussion in his<br />

classroom controversial topics<br />

outside <strong>of</strong> his own field <strong>of</strong> study.<br />

The teacher is morally bound not to<br />

take advantage <strong>of</strong> his position by<br />

introducing into <strong>the</strong> classroom<br />

provocative discussions <strong>of</strong> irrelevant<br />

subjects not within <strong>the</strong> field <strong>of</strong> study.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

95


(3) The School should<br />

recognize that <strong>the</strong> teacher,<br />

in speaking or writing<br />

outside <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> institution<br />

upon subjects beyond <strong>the</strong><br />

scope <strong>of</strong> his own field <strong>of</strong><br />

study, is entitled precisely<br />

to <strong>the</strong> same freedom and<br />

is subject to <strong>the</strong> same<br />

responsibility as attached<br />

to all o<strong>the</strong>r citizens.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

96


If <strong>the</strong> extramural utterances <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> teacher<br />

should be such as to raise grave doubts<br />

concerning his fitness for <strong>the</strong> position, <strong>the</strong><br />

questions should in all cases be submitted<br />

to an appropriate committee <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> faculty <strong>of</strong><br />

which he is a member.<br />

It should be clearly understood that an<br />

institution assumes no responsibility for<br />

views expressed by members <strong>of</strong> its staff.<br />

On <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, <strong>the</strong> teachers should, when<br />

necessary, take pains to make it clear that<br />

<strong>the</strong>y are expressing only <strong>the</strong>ir personal<br />

opinions.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

97


ACADEMIC FREEDOM<br />

ATENEO AS A<br />

CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY<br />

VS<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

PRO-RH TEACHER<br />

98


Declaration <strong>of</strong> Support for House Bill 4244 (The<br />

Responsible Parenthood, Reproductive Health<br />

and Population and Development Bill) by<br />

individual faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ateneo de Manila<br />

University<br />

We, <strong>the</strong> undersigned individual faculty <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Ateneo de<br />

Manila University, declare our strong support for House<br />

Bill 4244, <strong>the</strong> consolidated Responsible Parenthood,<br />

Reproductive Health and Population and Development<br />

Bill (or RH Bill). We are heartened by <strong>the</strong> recent move <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

House <strong>of</strong> Representatives to terminate <strong>the</strong> protracted debates<br />

and interpellations on this bill which has languished in<br />

Congress since 1999.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

99


We urge our legislators to act swiftly and<br />

judiciously on <strong>the</strong> proposed amendments<br />

to <strong>the</strong> bill, and <strong>the</strong>reafter vote for its<br />

passage. We issue this call in our<br />

individual capacities as educators,<br />

researchers, medical doctors, lawyers,<br />

and citizens, and in no way speak for<br />

our University, <strong>the</strong> Society <strong>of</strong> Jesus, or<br />

<strong>the</strong> rest <strong>of</strong> our colleagues.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

100


MEDIA REPORTS <strong>of</strong> certain<br />

sectors urging Ateneo de<br />

Manila to investigate and<br />

impose sanctions upon <strong>the</strong><br />

pr<strong>of</strong>essors, for espousing<br />

positions contrary to <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Catholic</strong> Church.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

101


CEAP POSITION:<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

102


CEAP supports <strong>the</strong> bishops in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

opposition to any law which contains<br />

provisions for abortifacient control<br />

<strong>of</strong> birth. Killing <strong>of</strong> human life is<br />

absolutely proscribed. It is prohibited<br />

by <strong>the</strong> Philippine Constitution which<br />

protects life from <strong>the</strong> moment <strong>of</strong><br />

conception. It is also prohibited by<br />

<strong>the</strong> Fifth Commandment.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

103


It supports <strong>the</strong> bishops in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

opposition to any provisions <strong>of</strong><br />

law that force any <strong>Catholic</strong><br />

believer to act against his/her<br />

conscience in <strong>the</strong> discharge <strong>of</strong><br />

his/her duties as a doctor, health<br />

worker, employer or employee.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

104


It supports <strong>the</strong><br />

bishops in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

opposition to any<br />

provision that<br />

usurps <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong><br />

parents to take full<br />

responsibility for<br />

sexual education <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir children.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

105


CEAP supports <strong>the</strong> bishops in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

<strong>of</strong>ficial teaching, binding on all believers,<br />

concerning <strong>the</strong> dignity <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> human life,<br />

<strong>the</strong> need to “choose life” and to support<br />

a culture <strong>of</strong> life, <strong>the</strong> sacredness <strong>of</strong><br />

sexuality, <strong>the</strong> unity in principle <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> unitive (“for love”) and<br />

procreative (“openness to life”)<br />

finalities <strong>of</strong> acts <strong>of</strong> sexuality,<br />

recognizing God to be <strong>the</strong> author <strong>of</strong> life<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

106


Here one must carefully distinguish between:<br />

The authority <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> bishops binding<br />

believers to obedience in faith to a<br />

<strong>Catholic</strong> moral order;<br />

and<br />

The authority <strong>of</strong> discerning reason within<br />

<strong>the</strong> civil (pr<strong>of</strong>ane) society, especially in<br />

discernment articulating demands <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

common good or social justice, binding on<br />

reasonable persons based on compelling<br />

rationality<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

107


“compelling rationality”<br />

Rationality that is based on<br />

discussion and assent, as<br />

enlightened by believers<br />

in a plural society.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

108


PASTOR DIONISIO V. AUSTRIA vs. HON. NATIONAL<br />

LABOR RELATIONS COMMISSION et. al. (G.R. No.<br />

124382, August 16, 1999)<br />

CONCEPT OF<br />

SEPARATION OF<br />

CHURCH AND<br />

STATE<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

109


IS THIS AN ISSUE<br />

WHICH THE COURTS<br />

MAY RULE UPON?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

110


The rationale <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> principle <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

separation <strong>of</strong> church and state is<br />

summed up in <strong>the</strong> familiar saying,<br />

"STRONG FENCES MAKE<br />

GOOD-NEIGHBORS.“<br />

• delineate <strong>the</strong> boundaries between <strong>the</strong><br />

two institutions<br />

• avoid encroachments by one against<br />

<strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r because <strong>of</strong> a<br />

misunderstanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> limits <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

respective exclusive ASSEMBLY 083012 jurisdictions.<br />

111


The demarcation line calls on <strong>the</strong> entities<br />

to "render <strong>the</strong>refore unto Ceasar <strong>the</strong><br />

things that are Ceasar's and unto God <strong>the</strong><br />

things that are God's." 19<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

112


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

While <strong>the</strong> state is<br />

prohibited from<br />

interfering in<br />

purely<br />

ecclesiastical<br />

affairs, <strong>the</strong><br />

Church is likewise<br />

barred from<br />

meddling in<br />

purely secular<br />

matters.<br />

113


THUS, THE SUPREME COURT HAS<br />

GENERALLY RULED THAT THE<br />

COURTS HAVE NO JURISDICTION<br />

OVER MATTERS WHICH ARE<br />

ECCLESIASTICAL IN NATURE.<br />

BUT WHERE THE ISSUE PERTAINS TO<br />

MATTERS WHICH ARE SECULAR IN<br />

NATURE, THEN THE COURTS WILL<br />

GENERALLY HAVE JURISDICTION.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

114


an ecclesiastical<br />

affair involves <strong>the</strong><br />

relationship<br />

between <strong>the</strong> church<br />

and its members<br />

and relate to<br />

matters <strong>of</strong> faith,<br />

religious doctrines,<br />

worship and<br />

governance <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

congregation.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

115


To be concrete, examples <strong>of</strong> this socalled<br />

ecclesiastical affairs to which <strong>the</strong><br />

State CANNOT meddle in are:<br />

proceedings for excommunication;<br />

ordinations <strong>of</strong> religious ministers;<br />

administration <strong>of</strong> sacraments;<br />

and o<strong>the</strong>r activities with attached<br />

religious significance.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

116


While <strong>the</strong> matter at hand relates to<br />

<strong>the</strong> church and its religious<br />

minister (TERMINATION OF<br />

PASTOR AUSTRIA), it does<br />

not ipso facto give <strong>the</strong> case a<br />

religious significance.<br />

Simply stated, what is involved<br />

here is <strong>the</strong> relationship <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

church as an employer and <strong>the</strong><br />

minister as an employee. It is<br />

purely secular and has no relation<br />

whatsoever with <strong>the</strong> practice <strong>of</strong><br />

faith, worship or doctrines <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

church.<br />

117<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012


In this case, petitioner was not excommunicated<br />

or expelled from <strong>the</strong><br />

membership <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> SDA but was<br />

terminated from employment.<br />

Indeed, <strong>the</strong> matter <strong>of</strong> terminating<br />

an employee, which is purely<br />

secular in nature, is different from<br />

<strong>the</strong> ecclesiastical act <strong>of</strong> expelling a<br />

member from <strong>the</strong> religious<br />

congregation.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

118


IN AN EXAMPLE WHERE A PROFESSOR<br />

IN A CATHOLIC UNIVERSITY OR<br />

SCHOOL WERE TO TAKE A PERSONAL<br />

POSITION NOT IN CONFORMITY WITH<br />

THE CHURCH POSITION –<br />

“TEACHING” (ACADEMIC<br />

FREEDOM) VS. “OPINION”<br />

(FREEDOM OF SPEECH)<br />

“IN CLASSROOM”<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

119


DISTINGUISH FINE LINES<br />

BETWEEN:<br />

• PROFESSOR OF THEOLOGY VS<br />

PROFESSOR OF SOCIAL SCIENCE<br />

• THE ATENEO PROFESSOR ACTING AS<br />

A TEACHER OR AS AN INDIVIDUAL<br />

• LEGAL REQUIREMENTS FOR<br />

DISCIPLINARY SANCTIONS<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

120


“CONDUCT THAT RENDERS<br />

THE TEACHER UNFIT TO<br />

TEACH IN A CATHOLIC<br />

UNIVERSITY”<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

121


VALID TERMINATION<br />

JUST OR<br />

AUTHORIZED<br />

CAUSES (Art.<br />

282, Labor Code)<br />

ACLEX MCLE LABOR UPDATES<br />

20 JULY 2012<br />

122


SERIOUS MISCONDUCT<br />

- defined as IMPROPER OR WRONG<br />

CONDUCT, a transgression <strong>of</strong> a<br />

definite rule <strong>of</strong> action, a forbidden act<br />

or dereliction <strong>of</strong> duty which is willful in<br />

character and implies wrongful intent,<br />

and not mere error in judgment.<br />

ACLEX MCLE LABOR UPDATES<br />

20 JULY 2012<br />

123


- For misconduct or improper<br />

behavior to be a just cause for<br />

dismissal, <strong>the</strong> same must be<br />

related to <strong>the</strong> performance <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> employee’s duties and<br />

must show that he has become<br />

unfit to continue working for <strong>the</strong><br />

employer. (Molato vs. NLRC)<br />

ACLEX MCLE LABOR UPDATES<br />

20 JULY 2012<br />

124


Elements:<br />

GROSS INSUBORDINATION<br />

(a) employee’s assailed conduct must be willful or<br />

intentional;<br />

(b) willfulness characterized by wrongful or<br />

perverse attitude;<br />

(c) <strong>the</strong> order violated must be reasonable, lawful<br />

and made known to <strong>the</strong> employee; and<br />

(d) <strong>the</strong> order must pertain to <strong>the</strong> duties which <strong>the</strong><br />

employee has been engaged to discharge. (Aguilar<br />

vs. NLRC; Stolt Nielson vs. NLRC; contra: Manebo vs.<br />

NLRC;)<br />

ACLEX MCLE LABOR<br />

UPDATES 20 JULY 2012<br />

125


WEARING THE HIJAB<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

126


Philippine school bans Muslim hijab<br />

Agence France-Presse1:01 pm | Sunday, August 5th, 2012<br />

ZAMBOANGA, <strong>Philippines</strong> – A <strong>Catholic</strong>-run school in <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn<br />

<strong>Philippines</strong> has caused controversy by banning Muslim students from<br />

wearing <strong>the</strong> hijab headscarf.<br />

Mehol Sadain, who heads <strong>the</strong> National Commission on Muslim Filipinos,<br />

said Sunday he had written to Pilar College in <strong>the</strong> mixed Muslim-Christian<br />

port city <strong>of</strong> Zamboanga to demand it reverse its policy.<br />

While <strong>the</strong> school was right to claim it could exercise academic freedom,<br />

Sadain said it should do so with “justice and fair play”.<br />

“Pilar College should realize that while educational institutions can<br />

formulate <strong>the</strong>ir own policies, <strong>the</strong> same should not run counter to existing<br />

laws and state policies,” Sadain said.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

127


MATRIX IN THE CONTEXT OF<br />

ACADEMIC FREEDOM<br />

THE INSTITUTION<br />

VS<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

THE STUDENT<br />

128


ENROLMENT CONTRACT,<br />

WHICH PRESUMES A<br />

MEETING OF THE MINDS<br />

RIGHT OF THE SCHOOL TO EXERCISE<br />

ACADEMIC FREEDOM AND IMPOSE<br />

RULES AND REGULATIONS<br />

-Balanced against –<br />

STUDENT AS A FILIPINO CITIZEN<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

129


BALANCE THE CONFLICTING<br />

INTERESTS IN THE CONTEXT OF<br />

THE EXISTING CIRCUMSTANCES<br />

• PLACE vis-à-vis students<br />

enrolled<br />

• student market<br />

• cultural sensitivities<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

130


“Let faith dialogue with reason,<br />

and reason with faith.<br />

Because faith is reasonable,<br />

and reason leads us to faith.” -<br />

Monsignor Gerry Santos, quoting Pope Benedict.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

131


STUDENT INFRACTIONS<br />

ARISING FROM<br />

INTERNET AND MEDIA<br />

INFLUENCE ON STUDENT<br />

BEHAVIOR<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

132


• Cyber-bullying through<br />

Facebook and Multiply<br />

site use<br />

• US trends in media-<br />

influenced errant<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> students<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

133


Ms. Emily Abrera<br />

President, Harrison<br />

Communications<br />

Chairman Emeritus,<br />

McCann Worldgroups<br />

Major Conference Session<br />

Jesuit Basic Education<br />

Sesquicentennial Congress<br />

July 13, 2009, Ateneo de Manila<br />

University<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

134


“There is a clear emergence and prominence <strong>of</strong><br />

technology-related activities like usage <strong>of</strong> cellphone<br />

and internet… The use <strong>of</strong> virtual technology seems<br />

more <strong>the</strong> exclusive territory <strong>of</strong> teens and 20somethings.<br />

They are watching less TV, listening to less<br />

radio, and also reading less. They are doing<br />

less sports, interacting face-to-face with<br />

friends less frequently, and spending less<br />

money on traditional consumer items… thanks<br />

to text messaging and <strong>the</strong> internet.<br />

More and more, <strong>the</strong>ir lives are being lived<br />

out virtually.”<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

135


Youth Activities Comparison: 2000 vs. 2005<br />

The growing popularity <strong>of</strong> activities related to “virtual” connectivity.<br />

Activities After School (%)<br />

Base: Total Respondents<br />

2000<br />

2005<br />

Playing Computer/Video Games 10 33<br />

Text Messaging 12 33<br />

Email/Surf/Chat on <strong>the</strong> Net 11 25<br />

Usual Leisure Activities (%)<br />

2000 2005<br />

Window Shopping 22 36<br />

Text Messaging 12 40<br />

Playing Computer/Video Games 17 38<br />

Email/Surf/Chat on <strong>the</strong> Net 13 27<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”


In 2009, a joint study was<br />

launched by Yahoo! and<br />

Nielsen to ga<strong>the</strong>r a baseline<br />

understanding <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> Filipino<br />

internet user, and this has been<br />

updated every year to present,<br />

to determine <strong>the</strong> shifts in user<br />

behavior and evolving<br />

preferences.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

137


Among <strong>the</strong> highlights in<br />

<strong>the</strong> Digital <strong>Philippines</strong><br />

2011 Yahoo-Nielsen<br />

Net Index are as<br />

follows:<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

138


There is increased time spent online<br />

across mediums and locations, viz.,<br />

home, school, work, and internet cafes.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

139


There are more households with<br />

internet access from 27% in 2009<br />

to 35% in 2011, <strong>the</strong>reby resulting in a<br />

declining shift in internet café access<br />

from 71% in 2009 to 66% in 2011.<br />

This also means that people are<br />

preferring more private access to <strong>the</strong><br />

internet, ra<strong>the</strong>r than shared access.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

140


Online social networks<br />

present a new and growing<br />

environment wherein people<br />

exchange social information<br />

and manage impressions<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

141


SOCIAL NETWORKING SITES<br />

Facebook/multiply/hi-5 are free-access<br />

social networking website that is operated and privately<br />

owned by different companies.<br />

Users can join networks organized by city,<br />

workplace, school, and region to connect<br />

and interact with o<strong>the</strong>r people.<br />

People can also add friends, or friends <strong>of</strong><br />

friends; send <strong>the</strong>m messages, and update<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir personal pr<strong>of</strong>iles to notify friends about<br />

<strong>the</strong>mselves.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

142


Out <strong>of</strong> a total 101 Million<br />

population, 33% or approximately<br />

33.6 Million are internet users.<br />

Of <strong>the</strong>se internet users as <strong>of</strong> 31 March<br />

2012, 27.7 Million are Facebook<br />

users or a 27% penetration among<br />

<strong>the</strong> total population.<br />

http://www.internetworldstats.com/asia.htm<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

143


MAJOR SOURCES<br />

OF INFORMATION<br />

AND COMMUNICATION<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

144


what<br />

good<br />

bad<br />

• MOBILE PHONES<br />

• Keeping in touch; sms and photos<br />

• Good for emergency<br />

• Sending nasty text messages (SEXTING)<br />

• Taking/sharing nasty pictures or videos<br />

Source content:<br />

http://www.brent.edu.ph/newsletter/pdf/Resposible_Use_<strong>of</strong>_Technology_and_Cyberbullying.pdf<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

145


what<br />

good<br />

bad<br />

• SOCIAL NETWORK SITES<br />

• Socializing with friends and making new ones in<br />

<strong>the</strong> online virtual community<br />

• Allowing young people to be creative<br />

• Sending nasty text messages; sharing <strong>of</strong> nasty<br />

pictures or videos<br />

• Ganging up on someone; making friends under<br />

false pretenses; hacking onto personal website<br />

account<br />

Source content:<br />

http://www.brent.edu.ph/newsletter/pdf/Resposible_Use_<strong>of</strong>_Technology_and_Cyberbullying.pdf<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

146


what<br />

good<br />

bad<br />

• INSTANT MESSAGING (Yahoo etc)<br />

• Text or voice chatting live with friends online<br />

• Quick effective way to keep in touch while<br />

working on <strong>the</strong> computer<br />

• Sending nasty text messages<br />

• Using someone else’s account (hacking) and<br />

forwarding to o<strong>the</strong>rs; making friends under false<br />

pretenses; hacking onto personal website<br />

account<br />

Source content:<br />

http://www.brent.edu.ph/newsletter/pdf/Resposible_Use_<strong>of</strong>_Technology_and_Cyberbullying.pdf<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

147


what<br />

good<br />

bad<br />

• CHAT ROOMS AND BOARD MESSAGES<br />

• Groups <strong>of</strong> people text or voice chat about<br />

common interests<br />

• Easy way to get to know new people and talk<br />

about issues <strong>the</strong>y are too shy to talk about in<br />

person<br />

• Sending nasty or anonymous messages;<br />

groups <strong>of</strong> people ganging up on someone<br />

• Making friends under false pretenses, making<br />

use <strong>of</strong> personal information for blackmail or<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r purposes<br />

Source content:<br />

http://www.brent.edu.ph/newsletter/pdf/Resposible_Use_<strong>of</strong>_Technology_and_Cyberbullying.pdf<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

148


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

149


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

150


Youth Value Systems<br />

Using <strong>the</strong> ‘sealed envelope technique,” respondents<br />

were shown a battery <strong>of</strong> different activities that were<br />

conventionally labeled as wrong, and were asked 2<br />

things:<br />

Personal View<br />

Society’s View<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

Which ones are right and<br />

wrong?<br />

Which ones are acceptable to<br />

society?<br />

151


What’s wrong, what’s right?<br />

Across all activities covered in <strong>the</strong> study, only <strong>the</strong><br />

use <strong>of</strong> illegal drugs and, to a certain extent,<br />

cheating on one’s boyfriend or girlfriend are<br />

considered wrong by <strong>the</strong> greater majority.<br />

Only about 6 out <strong>of</strong> 10 consider <strong>the</strong>se wrong:<br />

taking something without paying, use <strong>of</strong><br />

violence, drugs, drunk driving, suicide,<br />

marital infidelity, and casual sex.<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box: 2006<br />

Intergeneration Study”<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

152


What’s wrong, what’s right?<br />

About half think that pre-marital sex, sex<br />

on TV, phone/internet sex, porn, and<br />

sexually explicit language are wrong.<br />

Less than half think that abortion,<br />

divorce/separation, violence on TV, paying<br />

for sex, and gay relationships are wrong.<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box: 2006<br />

Intergeneration Study”<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

153


Youth’s Value Systems<br />

Trends: 2000 to 2005<br />

Examining <strong>the</strong> data by region,<br />

however, we see stark trends…<br />

With <strong>the</strong> exception <strong>of</strong> Balance Luzon,<br />

teens have shifted <strong>the</strong>ir personal<br />

definitions <strong>of</strong> right and wrong –<br />

becoming more tolerant <strong>of</strong> many<br />

behaviors.<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

154


Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />

(Metro Manila)<br />

Use forbidden drugs<br />

Cheat on boyfriend/girlfriend<br />

Sell or buy illegal drugs<br />

Take something w/o paying<br />

Sell oneself for sex<br />

Stay away from school/work<br />

Drunk driving<br />

Avoid paying taxes<br />

Marital infidelity<br />

Divorce/separation<br />

Look at porn material<br />

Hazing<br />

Cheat in school<br />

Use violence<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

2005<br />

2000<br />

1992


Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />

(Metro Manila)<br />

Smoke cigarettes<br />

Use sexually explicit language<br />

Sell porn material<br />

Pre-marital sex<br />

Gambling<br />

Phone/internet sex<br />

Getting drunk<br />

Race a car or motorbike<br />

Abortion<br />

Homosexual relationship<br />

Use a prostitute<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

2005<br />

2000<br />

1992


Mindanao teens remain <strong>the</strong><br />

“liberals” compared to those<br />

from o<strong>the</strong>r regions…<br />

But even more so in 2005,<br />

especially on matters related<br />

to forbidden drugs,<br />

pornography, cheating and<br />

violence.<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study” 157<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012


Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />

(Mindanao)<br />

Use forbidden drugs<br />

Cheat on boyfriend/girlfriend<br />

Sell or buy illegal drugs<br />

Take something w/o paying<br />

Sell oneself for sex<br />

Stay away from school/work<br />

Drunk driving<br />

Avoid paying taxes<br />

Marital infidelity<br />

Divorce/separation<br />

Look at porn material<br />

Hazing<br />

Cheat in school<br />

Use violence<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

2005<br />

2000


Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />

(Mindanao)<br />

Smoke cigarettes<br />

Use sexually explicit language<br />

Sell porn material<br />

Pre-marital sex<br />

Gambling<br />

Phone/internet sex<br />

Getting<br />

drunk<br />

Race a car or motorbike<br />

Abortion<br />

Homosexual relationship<br />

Use a prostitute<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

Stricter than before<br />

2005<br />

2000


Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />

(Visayas)<br />

Use forbidden drugs<br />

Cheat on boyfriend/girlfriend<br />

Sell or buy illegal drugs<br />

Take something w/o paying<br />

Sell oneself for sex<br />

Stay away from school/work<br />

Drunk driving<br />

Avoid paying taxes<br />

Marital infidelity<br />

Divorce/separation<br />

Look at porn material<br />

Hazing<br />

Cheat in school<br />

Use violence<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

But<br />

stricter<br />

on<br />

selling<br />

oneself<br />

!<br />

2005<br />

2000


Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />

(Visayas)<br />

Smoke cigarettes<br />

Use sexually explicit language<br />

Sell porn material<br />

Pre-marital sex<br />

Gambling<br />

Phone/internet sex<br />

Getting drunk<br />

Race a car or motorbike<br />

Abortion<br />

Homosexual relationship<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

Stricter than before<br />

2005<br />

Use a prostitute 2000<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”


Youth’s Value Systems<br />

Trends: 2000 to 2005<br />

In Balance Luzon, on <strong>the</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r hand, we<br />

see a reverse trend:<br />

Youth from this region have become more<br />

stringent when it comes to personal definitions<br />

<strong>of</strong> right and wrong.<br />

Only divorce/separation is considered “more<br />

right” than before.<br />

Gay relationships and pre-marital sex remain in<br />

<strong>the</strong> same levels as five years ago.<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

162


Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />

(Balance Luzon)<br />

Use forbidden drugs<br />

Cheat on boyfriend/girlfriend<br />

Sell or buy illegal drugs<br />

Take something w/o paying<br />

Sell oneself for sex<br />

Stay away from school/work<br />

Drunk driving<br />

Avoid paying taxes<br />

Marital infidelity<br />

Divorce/separation<br />

Look at porn material<br />

Hazing<br />

Cheat in school<br />

Use violence<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

2005<br />

2000


Personally Considered Wrong (in %)<br />

(Balance Luzon)<br />

Smoke cigarettes<br />

Use sexually explicit language<br />

Sell porn material<br />

Pre-marital sex<br />

Gambling<br />

Phone/internet sex<br />

Getting drunk<br />

Race a car or motorbike<br />

Abortion<br />

Homosexual relationship<br />

Use a prostitute<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />

0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100<br />

2005<br />

2000


Youth’s Value Systems<br />

Regional Differences<br />

With o<strong>the</strong>r regions (particularly Metro<br />

Manila and Mindanao) having shifted<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir stand on various acts from<br />

“wrong” to “less wrong” or “almost<br />

ok”…<br />

…it seems Balance Luzon has emerged<br />

as <strong>the</strong> region <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> country’s most<br />

conservative teens.<br />

Source: Mc Cann Erickson Study on “What’s Your Box:<br />

2006 Intergeneration Study”<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

165


NEW CASES: USUAL SCENARIOS<br />

• a girlfriend in <strong>the</strong> <strong>Philippines</strong> exposes her<br />

breasts online to her boyfriend and is<br />

captured on-cam. Sexy pictures are uploaded<br />

after she splits with boyfriend<br />

• downloading sexy pictures or x-rated<br />

movies, and inserting photo <strong>of</strong> ano<strong>the</strong>r<br />

person using Photoshop<br />

• conversations in private chat rooms or<br />

email correspondences in yahoogroups<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

166


CYBER-BULLYING<br />

Source: http://www.stopcyberbullying.org/what_is_cyberbullying_exactly.html<br />

"Cyberbullying" is when<br />

a child, preteen or teen<br />

is tormented,<br />

threatened, harassed,<br />

humiliated, embarrassed<br />

or o<strong>the</strong>rwise targeted by<br />

ano<strong>the</strong>r child, preteen or<br />

teen using <strong>the</strong> Internet,<br />

interactive and digital<br />

technologies or mobile<br />

phones.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

167


It has to have a minor on both sides, or at<br />

least have been instigated by a minor<br />

against ano<strong>the</strong>r minor or ano<strong>the</strong>r person.<br />

Once adults become involved, it is plain<br />

and simple cyber-harassment or<br />

cyberstalking.<br />

Adult cyber-harassment or cyberstalking<br />

is NEVER called cyberbullying.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

168


COMMON FORMS OF<br />

CYBERBULLYING<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

169


Fake multiply or facebook site<br />

with <strong>the</strong> maligned person as<br />

alleged site owner. Anonymous<br />

bully writes down nasty or<br />

malicious statements under <strong>the</strong><br />

assumed name <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> victim<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

170


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

GOSSIP-GIRL<br />

SYNDROME,<br />

where anonymous<br />

text messages about<br />

<strong>the</strong> victim, true or<br />

false, are circulated<br />

to <strong>the</strong> network to<br />

instigate o<strong>the</strong>rs to<br />

gang up on <strong>the</strong><br />

target, or are<br />

directly sent to <strong>the</strong><br />

victim, to hurt or<br />

embarrass him/her<br />

171


Using on-line sites or yahoogroups<br />

to defame ano<strong>the</strong>r, or threaten to<br />

defame <strong>the</strong>m if <strong>the</strong> victim would not<br />

give in to <strong>the</strong>ir whims and wishes.<br />

Threatened uploading <strong>of</strong> private<br />

messages, emails and/or photos as a<br />

means to solicit sexual favors<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

172


Cyberbulling can also occur when:<br />

• Students start maliciously posting<br />

mobile phone photos <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong>ir victims or<br />

teachers on <strong>the</strong> Internet,<br />

• setting up a web page under assumed<br />

name (<strong>the</strong> victim) or about <strong>the</strong>ir victim or<br />

teacher on a social networking site<br />

• posing online as <strong>the</strong> victim in chat<br />

rooms<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

173


WHY CYBER BULLY?<br />

When teens are brought to <strong>the</strong> point<br />

<strong>of</strong> intense anger, need for revenge or<br />

tear-inducing frustration, no one can<br />

predict what <strong>the</strong>y will do. Most cyber<br />

bullying though not only stems from<br />

<strong>the</strong>se but also because <strong>the</strong>y want to<br />

become entertained or <strong>the</strong>y’re very<br />

bored and have too much time on<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir hands.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

174


According to a survey by <strong>the</strong> Cyberbullying<br />

Research Center (www. cyberbullying.us), about<br />

20 percent <strong>of</strong> students age 11 to 18<br />

surveyed last year said <strong>the</strong>y'd been<br />

cyberbullied at some point in <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

lives. In <strong>the</strong> past year, a million<br />

children were victims <strong>of</strong><br />

cyberbullying on Facebook. (Jaser<br />

Marasigan, “The Writing on <strong>the</strong> FAcebook wall”, Manila<br />

Bulletin 31 Aug 2011. http://mb.com.ph/node/332636/<strong>the</strong>writing-facebook-wall)<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

175


PSYCHOLOGICAL CONSEQUENCES<br />

OF CYBERBULLYING:<br />

• fear, anxiety, restlessness.<br />

• damage to <strong>the</strong> victim’s welfare<br />

and physical well-being,<br />

• low esteem and lacking in self-<br />

confidence which may eventually<br />

damage <strong>the</strong>ir social worth.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

176


Although <strong>the</strong>re are no reported<br />

deaths or suicides yet in <strong>the</strong><br />

<strong>Philippines</strong> that have been<br />

linked to cyberbullying, <strong>the</strong>re<br />

are numerous instances <strong>of</strong><br />

reported suicides on account<br />

<strong>of</strong> cyberbullying in <strong>the</strong> United<br />

States<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

177


This is <strong>the</strong> story <strong>of</strong> JAMEY<br />

RODEMEYER <strong>of</strong> Buffalo, New York.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

178


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

179


NULLUM CRIMEN,<br />

SINE LEGE.<br />

There is no crime<br />

where <strong>the</strong>re is no law.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

180


We still do not have a law on cyber<br />

stalking or cyber bullying.<br />

What we presently have is<br />

Republic Act No. 8792, or <strong>the</strong> E-<br />

Commerce Act, which does not<br />

fully address <strong>the</strong> ramifications and<br />

concerns on cyberbullying<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

181


The Senate Committee has so far<br />

drafted SENATE BILL 2796,<br />

entitled <strong>the</strong> “CYBERCRIME<br />

PREVENTION ACT OF<br />

2011,” sponsored by Senator<br />

Edgardo Angara.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

182


Senator Miriam Defensor- Santiago had<br />

filed SENATE BILL NO. 2677, OR<br />

THE ANTI-BULLYING SCHOOL<br />

POLICY ACT, which would require<br />

schools to create concrete policies to<br />

address <strong>the</strong> issue <strong>of</strong> bullying,<br />

particularly those involving <strong>the</strong> use <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong> Internet and digital I technologies<br />

such as cellphones and computers, and<br />

to subject <strong>of</strong>fending students and<br />

minors to disciplinary actions<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

183


WHAT CAN BE DONE?<br />

The School may promulgate a<br />

specific “anti-bullying policy”<br />

and undertake an information<br />

campaign aimed at letting<br />

kids know that bullying and<br />

cyberbullying are prohibited<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

184


• Tell students to think before<br />

<strong>the</strong>y post any message and to<br />

be nice online.<br />

• If <strong>the</strong> student has been cyber-<br />

bullied or has witnessed one,<br />

direct him NOT to retaliate<br />

and to immediately report <strong>the</strong><br />

bad behavior to his parents<br />

or teachers<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

185


• Tell students never pass<br />

along harmful or cruel<br />

messages or images. Train<br />

students to delete<br />

suspicious email messages<br />

without opening <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

186


• Ask students to step up to<br />

friends who are<br />

cyberbullying and tell <strong>the</strong>m<br />

to stop.<br />

• Teach students how to use<br />

technology to block<br />

communication with<br />

cyberbullies.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

187


At home, supervise your<br />

child’s time online. Putting<br />

<strong>the</strong> computer in a common<br />

area, such as <strong>the</strong> kitchen,<br />

is a good idea.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

188


Addressing cyberbullying<br />

school-wide is key -- help<br />

institute a formal policy for<br />

dealing with any cyberbullying<br />

instances. Be sure students<br />

fully understand <strong>the</strong><br />

consequences.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

189


Teach students <strong>the</strong> basics <strong>of</strong><br />

smart and savvy Web behavior,<br />

such as never revealing<br />

passwords or real last names.<br />

Pay attention. If you notice a<br />

student is withdrawn, depressed<br />

or reluctant to attend school or<br />

social events, investigate.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

190


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

191


TAX EXEMPTION<br />

a grant <strong>of</strong> immunity, express<br />

or implied to particular<br />

persons or corporations<br />

from <strong>the</strong> obligation to pay<br />

taxes. (51 Am. Jur. 503)<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

192


EDUCATION AS VIEWED BY THE<br />

CONSTITUTION<br />

Art. III, Sec. 17. The State shall give priority to<br />

education, science and technology, arts, culture,<br />

and sports to foster patriotism and nationalism,<br />

accelerate social progress, and promote total<br />

human liberation and development.<br />

Art. XIV, Sec. 1. The State shall protect and<br />

promote <strong>the</strong> right <strong>of</strong> all citizens to quality<br />

education at all levels and shall take appropriate<br />

steps to make such education accessible to all<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

193


STATE’S RECOGNITION OF THE<br />

COMPLEMENTARY ROLES OF PUBLIC AND<br />

PRIVATE INSTITUTION IN THE REALM OF<br />

EDUCATION<br />

B.P 232, Sec. 41. The government, in recognition <strong>of</strong><br />

<strong>the</strong>ir complementary role in <strong>the</strong> educational system,<br />

may provide aid to <strong>the</strong> programs <strong>of</strong> private schools in<br />

<strong>the</strong> form <strong>of</strong> grants or scholarships, or loans from<br />

government financial institutions: Provided, That<br />

such programs meet certain defined educational<br />

requirements and standards and contribute to <strong>the</strong><br />

attainment <strong>of</strong> national development goals.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

194


STATE SUBSIDY<br />

BY WAY OF TAX EXEMPTION<br />

• TAX EXEMPTION FROM REAL OR<br />

PROPERTY TAXES<br />

• TAX EXEMPTION FROM INTERNAL<br />

REVENUE TAXES AND CUSTOM DUTIES<br />

• EXEMPTION FROM TAXES IMPOSED ON<br />

GIFTS AND DONATIONS<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

195


PROVIDED THAT THE LAND,<br />

INCOME OR DONATION IS USED<br />

ACTUALLY, DIRECTLY,<br />

AND EXCLUSIVELY FOR<br />

EDUCATIONAL PURPOSES<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

196


SITUATION:<br />

Sale <strong>of</strong> real property owned by<br />

<strong>the</strong> educational institution<br />

This is subject to transfer tax and<br />

documentary stamp tax, inasmuch as<br />

this is an activity which is not related to<br />

education but is assumed to be done<br />

for pr<strong>of</strong>it.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

197


SITUATION:<br />

SCHOOL WITH A CANTEEN.<br />

HOW IS IT TO BE TAXED?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

198


If <strong>the</strong> school canteen is actually operated<br />

by <strong>the</strong> school as a laboratory for its<br />

culinary arts students, or incidental to its<br />

operation as an educational institution,<br />

<strong>the</strong>n any pr<strong>of</strong>it derived from sales <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

products in <strong>the</strong> canteen is tax exempt<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

199


HOWEVER, if <strong>the</strong> school canteen is operated<br />

by a concessionaire who pays rent or a<br />

percentage <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> gross pr<strong>of</strong>it for <strong>the</strong><br />

use <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> premises to <strong>the</strong> School or for<br />

<strong>the</strong> privilege <strong>of</strong> operating <strong>the</strong> canteen within<br />

school premises, <strong>the</strong>n this is NOT<br />

considered by <strong>the</strong> BIR as tax-exempt.<br />

The Bureau <strong>of</strong> Internal Revenue/Dept <strong>of</strong><br />

Finance argue that <strong>the</strong> activity (rental <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong><br />

school canteen) is NOT related to <strong>the</strong><br />

educational purpose <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> School.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

200


BIR Rev Memo Circular No. 76-2003<br />

dtd 14 Nov 2003:<br />

REGULAR SCHOOL INCOME SUCH<br />

AS BOOKSTORES AND CANTEENS<br />

ARE EXEMPT, PROVIDED THAT<br />

THEY ARE OWNED AND OPERATED<br />

BY THE SCHOOL AND LOCATED IN<br />

THE SAME PREMISES.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

201


The government does not exempt<br />

educational institutions from paying<br />

local taxes or impositions such as<br />

Mayor’s permits or o<strong>the</strong>r license fees,<br />

stating that <strong>the</strong>se are not taxes but are<br />

regulatory fees in nature. Moreover, it is<br />

noted that local governments have<br />

different ordinances, not <strong>the</strong> least <strong>of</strong><br />

which are <strong>the</strong> Mayor’s and/or business<br />

permits. Sarmiento, Ulpiano. supra., at 854.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

202


ISSUE:<br />

WHAT IF THE PROFITS OF THE<br />

CANTEEN WERE USED TO<br />

SUBSIDIZE SCHOLARSHIPS?<br />

SUBSIDIZE HOSPITALIZATION<br />

EXPENSES FOR NUNS AND<br />

EMPLOYEES?<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

203


PROVE THAT THE PROCEEDS WERE<br />

USED ACTUALLY, DIRECTLY AND<br />

EXCLUSIVELY FOR EDUCATIONAL<br />

PURPOSES THROUGH PAPER TRAIL<br />

EXAMPLE: RECEIPTS SHOWING THAT<br />

THE PROCEEDS WERE USED FOR THE<br />

SCHOLARSHIP OF X NUMBER OF<br />

STUDENTS; OR FOR THE<br />

HOSPITALIZATION BENEFITS OF THE<br />

NUNS AND THE EMPLOYEES.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

204


CEAP PROPOSAL FOR A<br />

COMPREHENSIVE TAX<br />

EXEMPTION BILL:<br />

Any revenues or income from any activity<br />

undertaken by <strong>the</strong> educational institution,<br />

regardless <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> source, should be exempt<br />

from taxes. The reason is that any income<br />

earned by <strong>the</strong> non-stock, non-pr<strong>of</strong>it<br />

educational institution ultimately redounds to<br />

<strong>the</strong> benefit <strong>of</strong> <strong>the</strong> said institution for <strong>the</strong><br />

fur<strong>the</strong>rance <strong>of</strong> its primary objectives.<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

205


FOR FURTHER QUESTIONS:<br />

PLEASE EMAIL OR CALL:<br />

Ada D. Abad<br />

Cell: 0917-526-9732<br />

ada.abad@gmail.com<br />

Ofc: +632-844-0583/<br />

+632-843-8621<br />

CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

206


CEAP SMX NATIONAL<br />

ASSEMBLY 083012<br />

207

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!