05.07.2013 Views

Separate Realities: The Dream and the Iceberg - Scarecrow Press

Separate Realities: The Dream and the Iceberg - Scarecrow Press

Separate Realities: The Dream and the Iceberg - Scarecrow Press

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

88 Chapter 2<br />

<strong>the</strong> economic, political, <strong>and</strong> cultural arenas, with labor unions serving as <strong>the</strong><br />

core alternative organizational force.<br />

Our inclusion of trade unions as a key feature of <strong>the</strong> alternative power networks<br />

does not mean that we view unions as speaking with a single voice for<br />

workers or that we view all unions as consistent advocates for workers’ common<br />

class interests. We recognize <strong>the</strong> labor movement includes diverse <strong>and</strong><br />

sometimes contradictory trends <strong>and</strong> actions. Even so, among organizational<br />

alternatives to corporate power, trade unions possess <strong>the</strong> greatest concentration<br />

of human <strong>and</strong> economic resources <strong>and</strong> represent <strong>the</strong> most significant<br />

alternative organizational force countering corporate dominance. But this<br />

recognition does not diminish <strong>the</strong> importance of o<strong>the</strong>r organizations in <strong>the</strong><br />

alternative power networks, some of which are linked to leaders <strong>and</strong> funding<br />

sources associated with privileged-class backgrounds. Some of <strong>the</strong>se individuals<br />

<strong>and</strong> groups might, in some sense, be considered “class traitors” by<br />

more conventional privileged-class members. Such organizations include<br />

women’s rights groups (e.g., National Organization for Women), civil rights<br />

groups (e.g., National Association for <strong>the</strong> Advancement of Colored People),<br />

public interest groups (e.g., Ralph Nader’s numerous organizations), alternative,<br />

pro-new-working-class national circulation magazines (e.g., Nation,<br />

Progressive, Mo<strong>the</strong>r Jones, In <strong>The</strong>se Times), progressive research <strong>and</strong> policy<br />

groups (e.g., Economic Policy Institute), <strong>and</strong> some religious organizations.<br />

<strong>The</strong>se groups, often in conjunction with trade unions, are frequently involved<br />

in challenging <strong>the</strong> strategies, objectives, <strong>and</strong> policies of <strong>the</strong> dominant<br />

power networks.<br />

Inequality <strong>and</strong> Inequity<br />

<strong>The</strong> efforts of alternative-power-network groups to promote economic, political,<br />

<strong>and</strong> social policy changes that will reduce class-, gender-, <strong>and</strong> race-/<br />

ethnicity-based inequalities call attention to <strong>the</strong> distinction between inequality<br />

<strong>and</strong> inequity. Inequality refers to <strong>the</strong> objective reality (factually verifiable)<br />

that various distinct <strong>and</strong> identifiable groups (e.g., class, gender, racial/ethnic<br />

groups) receive unequal shares of various forms of scarce <strong>and</strong> valued resources<br />

distributed within <strong>the</strong> society. For example, much of <strong>the</strong> evidence presented<br />

thus far concerning differences in <strong>the</strong> distribution of consumption <strong>and</strong> investment<br />

capital illustrates that <strong>the</strong> highly unequal economic <strong>and</strong> political outcomes<br />

people experience in <strong>the</strong> United States are often based on <strong>the</strong>ir membership<br />

in class, gender, <strong>and</strong> race-/ethnicity-based groups.<br />

Inequity refers to a subjective judgment that <strong>the</strong> unequal access to scarce<br />

<strong>and</strong> valued resources experienced by groups distinguished by class, gender,<br />

<strong>and</strong>/or racial/ethnic membership is unfair <strong>and</strong> unjust. This concept interprets<br />

<strong>the</strong> organizationally based policies <strong>and</strong> practices used as <strong>the</strong> bases for unequally<br />

distributing scarce <strong>and</strong> valued resources as fundamentally flawed in<br />

<strong>the</strong> sense that <strong>the</strong>y arbitrarily privilege some groups over o<strong>the</strong>rs <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>reby

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!