17.07.2013 Views

Observational Evidence Favors a Static Universe - Journal of ...

Observational Evidence Favors a Static Universe - Journal of ...

Observational Evidence Favors a Static Universe - Journal of ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 1: Width <strong>of</strong> supernovae type 1a verses redshift for Union data. The<br />

dashed line (black) is expected time dilation in an expanding cosmology. The<br />

solid line (red) is the function µ BB(z) − µ CC(z).<br />

for the telescope. Then the expected distribution <strong>of</strong> supernovae as a function <strong>of</strong><br />

redshift should be proportional to the comoving volume. To check the redshift<br />

distribution the 300 acceptable supernovae were put in six bins in ascending<br />

order <strong>of</strong> redshift so that there were 50 supernovae in each bin. Then the cut<strong>of</strong>f<br />

apparent magnitude (24.95 mag) was chosen so that all supernovae in the first<br />

five bins would be included. The results are shown in Table 6 where the columns<br />

are: the bin number, the redshift range, the included number in the bin, the<br />

ratio <strong>of</strong> BB volume in that bin to the BB volume in bin 2 and an estimate<br />

based on CC (see below). The results for bin one are not unexpected. It simply<br />

shows that there have been many more searches done for supernovae at nearby<br />

30

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!