17.07.2013 Views

Bronchoalveolar Lavage in the Normal Volunteer Subject* - Chest

Bronchoalveolar Lavage in the Normal Volunteer Subject* - Chest

Bronchoalveolar Lavage in the Normal Volunteer Subject* - Chest

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

MATERIALS AND METHODS<br />

Subjects<br />

The study was completed over an <strong>in</strong>terval of approximately five<br />

years. <strong>Normal</strong> volunteer subjects were solicited for <strong>the</strong> study by<br />

word of mouth and posted notices and were reimbursed for <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

participation. Rigid criteria for <strong>in</strong>clusion <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study <strong>in</strong>cluded <strong>the</strong><br />

follow<strong>in</strong>g: (1) lack of history of pulmonary disease; (2) nonsmokers;<br />

(3) normal posterior-anterior and lateral chest roentgenograms (if<br />

none <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> previous year); (4) normal, complete pulmonary function<br />

tests; (5) normal heart and lung physical exam<strong>in</strong>ation; (6) tak<strong>in</strong>g no<br />

medication; and (7) no history of viral or o<strong>the</strong>r illness for several<br />

weeks prior to <strong>the</strong> study Performance of BAL <strong>in</strong> volunteer subjects<br />

was approved by <strong>the</strong> Committee for <strong>the</strong> Use of Human Subjects at<br />

Memorial Hospital of Rhode Island and <strong>in</strong>formed consent was<br />

obta<strong>in</strong>ed from all subjects prior to study Seventy-eight subjects (44<br />

men and 34 women), aged 20 to 36 years, participated <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study.<br />

The average age of <strong>the</strong> subjects was 26.3. Several potential subjects<br />

were excluded prior to pulmonary function test<strong>in</strong>g on <strong>the</strong> basis of<br />

historic evidence of lung disease, usually reactive airways disease.<br />

One potential subject had an abnormal chest roentgenogram show<strong>in</strong>g<br />

bilateral hilar adenopathy and was thus disqualified from<br />

participation. Three o<strong>the</strong>r subjects were disqualified for participation<br />

<strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> study by virtue of evidence of obstructive lung disease<br />

on pulmonary function test<strong>in</strong>g despite giv<strong>in</strong>g no history of airways<br />

disease. Appropriate local anes<strong>the</strong>sia could not be achieved <strong>in</strong> two<br />

o<strong>the</strong>r subjects and consequently, bronchoscopy was term<strong>in</strong>ated<br />

prior to enter<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> trachea.<br />

Bronchoscopy and BAL<br />

Subjects were <strong>in</strong>structed to take noth<strong>in</strong>g by mouth after midnight<br />

prior to <strong>the</strong> bronchoscopy All bronchoscopies were performed<br />

between 7:30 and 8:30 AM, by, or under <strong>the</strong> direct supervision of<br />

one of <strong>the</strong> authors, (D. B. E.). An <strong>in</strong>travenous l<strong>in</strong>e with 5 percent<br />

dextrose <strong>in</strong> water was established <strong>in</strong> an antecubital ve<strong>in</strong>. Atrop<strong>in</strong>e,<br />

0.6 mg, was adm<strong>in</strong>istered immediately via this l<strong>in</strong>e. Cardiac rate<br />

and rhythm were monitored electrocardiographically us<strong>in</strong>g precordial<br />

chest leads. Oxygen, 2 liters per m<strong>in</strong>ute, per nasal cannulae<br />

was adm<strong>in</strong>istered for <strong>the</strong> first 25 bronchoscopies. However, use of<br />

oxygen dur<strong>in</strong>g subsequent bronchoscopies was discont<strong>in</strong>ued s<strong>in</strong>ce<br />

ear oximetry showed no decrease of oxygen desaturation at any<br />

po<strong>in</strong>t dur<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> bronchoalveolar lavage procedure even when no<br />

supplemental 02 was used, and <strong>the</strong> nasal cannulae were a major<br />

source of discomfort for <strong>the</strong> subjects. There was no evidence that<br />

<strong>the</strong> adm<strong>in</strong>istration of 02 changed BAL results. Subjects were<br />

ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>ed <strong>in</strong> a semirecumbent position throughout <strong>the</strong> procedure<br />

<strong>in</strong> an adjustable, dental chair. Local anes<strong>the</strong>sia of <strong>the</strong> posterior<br />

pharynx was achieved by an aerosolized spray of 2 percent xyloca<strong>in</strong>e<br />

delivered through an air driven atomizer. Subjects were <strong>in</strong>structed<br />

to pant and <strong>the</strong>n deeply <strong>in</strong>hale <strong>the</strong> aerosolized anes<strong>the</strong>tic. A<br />

bronchoscope (external diameter of 4.8 mm) was <strong>the</strong>n <strong>in</strong>troduced<br />

perorally or occasionally pernasally (three subjects required pernasal<br />

route due to excessive gag us<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> peroral route). Once <strong>the</strong><br />

posterior portion of <strong>the</strong> tongue and epiglottis were visualized, 2<br />

percent xyloca<strong>in</strong>e was adm<strong>in</strong>istered directly via <strong>the</strong> bronchoscope.<br />

Adequate anes<strong>the</strong>sia was usually achieved with two, 2 ml aliquots<br />

of xyloca<strong>in</strong>e. The bronchoscope was <strong>the</strong>n advanced and <strong>the</strong> larynx<br />

and vocal cords were similarly anes<strong>the</strong>tized and <strong>the</strong>n passed. One<br />

milliliter of 2 percent xyloca<strong>in</strong>e was <strong>the</strong>n applied to <strong>the</strong> ma<strong>in</strong> car<strong>in</strong>a,<br />

<strong>the</strong> left ma<strong>in</strong> stem bronchus, <strong>the</strong> secondary car<strong>in</strong>a, and at <strong>the</strong><br />

l<strong>in</strong>gular orifice. The bronchoscope was <strong>the</strong>n advanced <strong>in</strong>to a B4 or<br />

B5 l<strong>in</strong>gular bronchus until it was completely wedged <strong>in</strong> such a<br />

position as to allow visualization of <strong>the</strong> distal bronchus. Three<br />

aliquots of40 ml of sterile normal sal<strong>in</strong>e solution at room temperature<br />

were <strong>in</strong>stilled through <strong>the</strong> bronchoscope and <strong>the</strong>n suctioned back<br />

(immediately after each <strong>in</strong>stillation) <strong>in</strong>to a sterile, 250 ml side-arm<br />

276<br />

Downloaded From: http://journal.publications.chestnet.org/ on 07/13/2013<br />

2, L<br />

-15"10 TO BRONCHOSCOPE<br />

-250<br />

TO WALL SUCTION<br />

FIGURE 1. Diagram of modification of a 250 ml filtration flask for<br />

collection of fluid returned by suction of BAL. The entire unit can<br />

withstand repeated steam autoclav<strong>in</strong>g.<br />

filtration flask adapted to function as a suction trap (see Fig 1). This<br />

entire unit is steam autoclavable to provide sterility should <strong>the</strong> cells<br />

be used later for tissue culture. Wall suction pressure was used but<br />

was applied <strong>in</strong> variable strength, controlled by partial occlusion of<br />

<strong>the</strong> suction port with <strong>the</strong> f<strong>in</strong>ger of <strong>the</strong> operator to permit sufficient<br />

suction without collaps<strong>in</strong>g <strong>the</strong> airway. Subjects were <strong>in</strong>structed to<br />

take slow deep breaths follow<strong>in</strong>g <strong>in</strong>stillation and removal of <strong>the</strong> third<br />

(and f<strong>in</strong>al) aliquot of sal<strong>in</strong>e solution. The bronchoscope was withdrawn<br />

and <strong>the</strong> subject was observed for possible adverse reactions<br />

(20 to 30 m<strong>in</strong>utes) before be<strong>in</strong>g allowed to depart. Each was<br />

encouraged to cough and to deep brea<strong>the</strong> for <strong>the</strong> rema<strong>in</strong>der of <strong>the</strong><br />

day and to report any adverse effects.<br />

Process<strong>in</strong>g of <strong>the</strong> BAL Specimen<br />

A total of IOOU penicill<strong>in</strong> g/ml and 100 ,ug streptomyc<strong>in</strong>/ml were<br />

added to <strong>the</strong> lavageate which was immediately decanted through<br />

four layers of sterile cotton gauze <strong>in</strong>to one or two polystyrene, 50<br />

ml centrifuge tubes. The specimen was <strong>the</strong>n centrifuged at 5OOg for<br />

20 m<strong>in</strong>utes at room temperature. The supernatant fluid was<br />

decanted, aliquoted, and stored at - 700 C. The cell pellets were<br />

resuspended with gentle pipett<strong>in</strong>g with a plugged Pasteur pipette<br />

<strong>in</strong> 3 ml phosphate buffered sal<strong>in</strong>e solution (PBS), pooled and brought<br />

up to 50 ml by addition of PBS, and <strong>the</strong>n re-centrifuged at 500 g<br />

for 20 m<strong>in</strong>utes. This wash<strong>in</strong>g step was repeated a total of three times<br />

and <strong>the</strong> cells were <strong>the</strong>n resuspended <strong>in</strong> 3 to 5 ml of culture medium.<br />

A tenfold dilution of a 50 pl aliquot of this suspension was used to<br />

count <strong>the</strong> cells on a hemocytometer. Viability of <strong>the</strong> cells was<br />

determ<strong>in</strong>ed by trypan blue dye exclusion. Cytocentrifuge preparations<br />

were made by plac<strong>in</strong>g 100 to 200 pd of a twofold to threefold<br />

dilution (ie, an approximate total of 1-2 x 105 cells) of <strong>the</strong> orig<strong>in</strong>al<br />

cell suspension <strong>in</strong> <strong>the</strong> cytocentrifuge cones and centrifug<strong>in</strong>g (at 250<br />

BAL <strong>in</strong> <strong>Normal</strong> <strong>Volunteer</strong> Subjects. 1. Technical Aspects (Ettensohn et al)

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!