18.07.2013 Views

The Corpus Thread - Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab

The Corpus Thread - Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab

The Corpus Thread - Det Danske Sprog- og Litteraturselskab

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

3.2. Header structure 40<br />

3.2.3.5 <strong>The</strong> participant description<br />

<strong>The</strong> participant description () element is used to provide<br />

additional information about authors (or speakers) of texts. <strong>The</strong> element<br />

itself is considered obligatory in the CTB header, however, its contents may<br />

just be an empty element which is given as a placeholder to ensure<br />

that the header has a valid TEI structure. If additional personal info is<br />

given, one element for each participant having been involved in<br />

creating the text is inserted into. 23 <strong>The</strong> element<br />

carries a number of attributes which are used to provide encoded values for<br />

some key aspects of the person concerned, see the following example: 24<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<strong>The</strong> DDOC material mentioned in Section 3.1 has a lot more information<br />

on each text creator, e.g. his place of birth which could be expressed as an<br />

element under, his place of residence which could<br />

be put into an element as sibling to , and so on.<br />

However, corpus-linguistic practice has shown that this type of information<br />

hardly ever is used (nor useful if it is not given according to clear-cut<br />

classification schemes). <strong>The</strong>refore, new material should not be marked-up<br />

with this kind of information that is also extremely costly to gather. For<br />

DDOC (and other material) which already carries this type of information,<br />

appropriate structural elements of should be included into the<br />

header to allow keeping this information for possible future investigation,<br />

see Chapter ??.<br />

3.2.4 <strong>The</strong> revision description<br />

A list of typical revisions which a document will undergo should be created,<br />

i.e. values for revisionType. At least the revision type “Document created”<br />

seems important. Others, which deal with the completeness of the header<br />

may be useful as well. <strong>The</strong> pattern of the revision description is as follows:<br />

23 A possible empty placeholder element may then be deleted.<br />

24 More details of which values to fill in can be found in Section 3.3.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!