19.07.2013 Views

Abraham Lincoln - American Memory

Abraham Lincoln - American Memory

Abraham Lincoln - American Memory

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

116<br />

merely a suspicious person, but was, in fact, the murderer and assassin<br />

of <strong>Abraham</strong> <strong>Lincoln</strong>. While I deem it my duty to say here, as I said<br />

before, when these declarations uttered by the accused on Sunday,<br />

the 16th, to Gardner and George D. Mudd, were attempted to be<br />

offered on the part of the accused, that they are in no sense evi-<br />

dence, and by the law were wholly inadmissible, yet I s tate it as my<br />

conviction that, being upon the record upon motion of the accused<br />

himself, so far as these declarations to Gardner and George D. Mudd<br />

go, they are additional indications of the guilt of the accused, in<br />

this, that they are manifestly suppressions of the truth and sugges-<br />

tions of falsehood and deception ; they are but the utterances and<br />

confessions of guilt.<br />

To Lieutenant Lovett, Joshua Lloyd, and Simon Gavican, who, in<br />

pursuit of the murderer, visited his house on the 18th of April, the<br />

Tuesday after the murder, he denied positively, upon inquiry, that<br />

two men had passed his house, or had come to his house on the<br />

morning after the assassination. Two of these witnesses swear posi-<br />

tively to his having made the denial, and the other says he hesitated<br />

to answer the question he put to him; all of them agree that he<br />

afterwards admitted that two men had been there, one of whom had<br />

a broken limb, which he had* set; and when asked by this witness<br />

who that man was. he said he did not know—that the man was a<br />

stranger to him, and that the two had been there but a short time.<br />

Lloyd asked him if he had ever seen any of the parties, Booth,<br />

Herold and Surratt, and he said he had never seen them; while it<br />

is positively proved that he was acquainted with John H. Surratt,<br />

who had been in his house; that he knew Booth, and had introduced<br />

Booth to Surratt last winter. Afterwards, on Friday, the 21st, he ad-<br />

mitted to Lloyd that he had been introduced to Booth last fall,<br />

and that this man, who came to his house on Saturday, the 15th, re-<br />

mained there from about 4 o'clock in the morning until about 4 in the<br />

afternoon; that one of them left his house on horseback, and the other<br />

walking. In the first conversation he denied ever having seen these<br />

men.<br />

Colonel Wells also testifies that, in his conversation with Dr. Mudd<br />

on Friday, the 21st, the prisoner said that he had gone to Bryan-<br />

town, or near Bryantown, to see some friends on Saturday, and that<br />

as he came back to his own house he saw the person he afterwards<br />

supposed to be Herold passing to the left of his house towards the<br />

barn, bnt that he did not see the other person at all after he left him<br />

in hiB own house, about 1 o'clock. If this statement be true, how

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!