Abraham Lincoln - American Memory
Abraham Lincoln - American Memory
Abraham Lincoln - American Memory
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
9<br />
to be a court and be incapable of pronouncing a judicial decision upon<br />
the question it undertook to try. If it decides at all, as a court, it<br />
necessarily affirms the existence and authority of the government<br />
under which it is exercising judicial power."—(Luther vs. Borden, 7<br />
Howard, 40.)<br />
That is the very question raised by the learned gentleman in his<br />
argument—that there was no authority in the President, by whose<br />
act alone this tribunal was constituted, to vest it with judicial power<br />
to try this issue ; and by the order upon your record, as has already<br />
been shown, if you have no power to try this issue for want of author-<br />
ity in Ihe Commander-in-Chief to constitute you a court, you are no<br />
court, and have no power to try any issue, because his order limits<br />
you to this issue, and this alone.<br />
It requires no very profound legal attainments to apply the ruling<br />
of the highest judicial tribunal of this country, just cited, to the<br />
point raised, not by the pleadings, but by the argument. This court<br />
exists as a judicial tribunal by authority only of the President of the<br />
United States ; the acceptance of the office is an acknowledgment of<br />
the validity of the authority conferring it, and if the President had<br />
no authority to order, direct, and constitute this court to try the ac-<br />
cused, and, as is claimed, did, in so constituting it, perform an uncon-<br />
stitutional and illegal act, it necessarily results that the order of the<br />
President is void and of no effect; that the order did not and could<br />
not constitute this a tribunal of justice, and therefore its members<br />
are incapable of pronouncing a judicial decision upon the question<br />
presented.<br />
There is a marked distinction between the question here<br />
presented and that raised by a plea to the jurisdiction of<br />
a tribunal whose existence as a court is neither questioned<br />
nor denied. Here it is argued, through many pages, by a learned<br />
Senator, and a distinguished lawyer, that the order of the President,<br />
by whose authority alone this court is constituted a tribunal of mili-<br />
tary justice, is unlawful; if unlawful it is void and of no effect, and<br />
has created no court; therefore this body, not being a court, can have<br />
no more power as a court to decide any question whatever than have its<br />
individual members power to decide that they as men do not in fact<br />
exist.<br />
It is a maxim of the common law—the perfection of human reason—<br />
that what is impossible the law requires of no man.<br />
How can it be possible that a judicial tribunal can decide the