Untitled - Lear
Untitled - Lear
Untitled - Lear
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Developmental patterns of complement clitics<br />
2. General Background: Complement Clitics, Derivation, and Modes of<br />
Acquisition<br />
2.1. Assumptions on Deriviation<br />
Romance complement 2 clitic pronouns are assumed to fill a special functional<br />
head position in the clause structure. According to different implementations of the<br />
basic account of their distribution, clitics are assumed to fill a head in the high part<br />
of the clausal functional structure dedicated to clitic pronouns (Sportiche’s (1996)<br />
“clitic voice”); they can be taken to move to an Agr-type head in the high part of the<br />
clause (Kayne (1991), Belletti (1999) and references cited there).The characteristic<br />
of Romance complement clitic pronouns resides in the fact that they are nominal<br />
arguments strictly connected to the verbal domain. Clitics are DPs which undergo a<br />
computation whose crucial step only concerns the head of the DP. Clitic heads and<br />
the head ultimately hosting the verb are intimately interrelated or actually coincident<br />
with both the clitic and the verb filling the same functional head position, as in the<br />
case of cliticization into finite verbs in French, Italian and other Romance languages.<br />
Whatever the exact implementation of the cliticization process we want to adopt, a<br />
functional head ultimately hosting the clitic is assumed to be present and active in<br />
the high part of the clausal functional structure. We can assume that languages differ<br />
as to whether such a functional head is activated or not: in languages with clitics it<br />
is, in languages which do not have clitic pronouns it is not.<br />
In finite clauses, Romance complement clitics are attached to the finite part of<br />
the verbal construction. If the finite verb is lexical, this results in the order Cl Vfin in<br />
declaratives. In both French and Italian, in periphrastic complex tenses involving an<br />
auxiliary and a past participle, the complement clitic pronoun ends up attached onto<br />
the auxiliary which carries the features related to finite morphology (e.g. person,<br />
number and tense) and which is the highest verbal form in the clause structure,<br />
yielding the order Cl Aux Past Participle (Cl Aux PPart). This is a typical ordering<br />
in Romance. To our knowledge, an order Aux Cl PPart is admitted (only) in<br />
Brazilian Portuguese (Bianchi and Figueiredo (1994)), where the status of object<br />
clitics is probably different and closer to that of weak pronouns of the Germanic<br />
type (Cardinaletti and Starke (1999; 2000) ). For complement clitics the cliticization<br />
process ultimately involves movement of the clitic as a head (D°) 3 , whereas weak<br />
pronouns move as maximal projections (DP) from the complement position to some<br />
2 Under the cover term complement clitics, we here include both direct and indirect object<br />
clitics (e.g. le, lui and reflexive clitics me te, se… in French) and prepositional clitics (e.g. en,<br />
y, in French).<br />
3 In the last step of the derivation, in a movement analysis of cliticization (Belletti (1999) and<br />
references cited there).<br />
41