CONSENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN - State Medical Board of Ohio ...
CONSENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN - State Medical Board of Ohio ...
CONSENT AGREEMENT BETWEEN - State Medical Board of Ohio ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Matter <strong>of</strong> Kyle Elliott Hoogendoorn, D.P.M. Page 21<br />
rhomboid muscles, and/or the intraspinous ligament, and/or greater trochanter,<br />
and/or gluteal area, and/or zygapophyseal joint <strong>of</strong> Patients 1-5, 7-9, 11, 14, 17,<br />
20-22. 6<br />
(St. Ex. 54B)<br />
Procedures Performed by Dr. Hoogendoorn – Trigger Point Injections<br />
49. Dr. Chelimsky testified that a trigger point is a place on the body that, if pressed, triggers<br />
pain that is felt in a different area than that being pressed. For example, a trigger point in<br />
the shoulder, if pressed, can cause pain that travels into the elbow and finger.<br />
Dr. Chelimsky testified that a trigger point injection is an injection <strong>of</strong> anesthetic, and<br />
possibly a steroid or other anti-inflammatory agent, into a trigger point. Dr. Chelimsky<br />
further testified that a physician needs to perform a physical examination to find trigger<br />
points. The physician palpates areas that are likely to have trigger points, which includes<br />
the shoulder areas, over the shoulder blades, along the mid-portion <strong>of</strong> the spine, and the hip<br />
and buttock regions. The physician can distinguish between trigger points and tender<br />
points by asking the patient if the pain travels. Further, Dr. Chelimsky testified that a<br />
trigger point “will usually have a little bit <strong>of</strong> an indurated feel to it.” (Tr. at 1572-1574)<br />
Dr. Chelimsky testified that trigger points are different from tender points. Tender points<br />
are areas <strong>of</strong> localized pain that, if pressed, do not produce pain in other areas <strong>of</strong> the body.<br />
Dr. Chelimsky believes that many <strong>of</strong> the procedures documented as trigger point injections<br />
in the patient records were actually tender point injections. (Tr. at 1573, 1618-1619)<br />
Testimony <strong>of</strong> Dr. Bressi<br />
50. The testimony <strong>of</strong> Dr. Bressi concerning the issue <strong>of</strong> trigger points versus tender points was<br />
largely consistent with that <strong>of</strong> Dr. Chelimsky. Dr. Bressi also testified that trigger points<br />
are typically near the places where muscles insert onto bone. (Tr. at 2250-2251)<br />
Dr. Bressi testified that tender points are more <strong>of</strong>ten felt in the belly <strong>of</strong> a muscle rather than<br />
near an insertion point. Dr. Bressi noted that tender points are characteristic <strong>of</strong><br />
fibromyalgia, which is a syndrome that “is still very controversial in the medical field.”<br />
Dr. Bressi stated that the techniques for performing trigger point and tender point injections<br />
are essentially the same. (Tr. at 2318-2319, 2440-2441)<br />
6 The notice letters issued to Dr. Leak, Dr. Griffin, and Dr. Hoogendoorn were based upon different patient keys.<br />
Dr. Leak’s patient key named 24 patients, numbered 1 through 24; Dr. Griffin’s named 23 patients, numbered 1<br />
through 23, and Dr. Hoogendoorn’s named 19 patients, numbered 1 through 19. Dr. Griffin’s patient key was a<br />
subset <strong>of</strong> Dr. Leak’s, and Dr. Hoogendoorn’s patient key was a subset <strong>of</strong> Dr. Leak’s and Dr. Griffin’s. Prior to the<br />
hearing, the Hearing Examiner ordered that Dr. Leak’s patient key be used as a master patient key, and that all<br />
patients in the consolidated hearing be referenced using the patient number from the master patient key. In this<br />
report, all patient references in the Summary <strong>of</strong> the Evidence refer to the master patient key. (See <strong>State</strong>’s Exhibit 26<br />
and <strong>Board</strong> Exhibit I)