22.07.2013 Views

Urology & Kidney Disease News Fall 2009 - Cleveland Clinic

Urology & Kidney Disease News Fall 2009 - Cleveland Clinic

Urology & Kidney Disease News Fall 2009 - Cleveland Clinic

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

18 <strong>Urology</strong> & <strong>Kidney</strong> <strong>Disease</strong> <strong>News</strong><br />

Prostate Cancer<br />

A Nomogram for Predicting Upgrading in Patients with Low and Intermediate Grade<br />

Prostate Cancer in the Era of Extending Prostate Sampling<br />

Ayman S. Moussa, MD, Michael W.<br />

Kattan, PhD, Changhong Yu, and J.<br />

Stephen Jones, MD, FACS<br />

The Gleason score (GS) is considered<br />

the most important factor in characterizing<br />

the biological potential of<br />

a prostate cancer and plays a major<br />

role in treatment decision making.<br />

However, the GS assigned at biopsy<br />

exhibits a limited correlation with the<br />

GS assigned following radical prostatectomy<br />

(RP). In previous studies, we<br />

found that 50% of patients with GS<br />

6 and 26.2 % of patients with GS > 7<br />

experienced postoperative upgrading.<br />

For men with biopsy GS 6 and/or 7<br />

(3+4), it is important not to underestimate<br />

the disease risk and to assess<br />

the accuracy of biopsy GS in predict-<br />

Figure 1: GS upgrade nomogram<br />

ing the actual pathological GS. Otherwise,<br />

patients with unrecognized<br />

high-grade cancer may choose less<br />

aggressive treatment options and be<br />

at increased risk of adverse oncologic<br />

outcomes.<br />

To address this issue, we examined<br />

the rate of Gleason score upgrading<br />

between biopsy and final pathology<br />

in a large cohort of patients and constructed<br />

a nomogram to predict the<br />

probability of biopsy Gleason sum<br />

upgrading. Our objective was to provide<br />

clinicians with a tool that could<br />

estimate the probability of a more<br />

aggressive prostate cancer variant,<br />

which could suggest a change in the<br />

selected treatment.<br />

Key Points:<br />

A study of 1,017 prostate cancer<br />

patients with theoretically low<br />

<br />

at diagnostic biopsy found that<br />

nearly one-third will be upgraded<br />

<br />

pathology.<br />

Our nomogram for predicting the<br />

probability of Gleason sum upgrading<br />

based on multiple variables had<br />

a predictive accuracy of 68%. It<br />

can provide important additional<br />

information to aid the urologist and<br />

ing,<br />

especially for patients considering<br />

non-surgical options.<br />

<br />

patients seen at our institution. Each scale<br />

position has corresponding prognostic<br />

-<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

Gleason score. For age, use age at time<br />

<br />

-<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

American, (C) for Caucasian and (O) for<br />

<br />

<br />

<br />

-<br />

<br />

<br />

percent cancer in any core: use the current<br />

<br />

<br />

the highest secondary grade present in the

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!