22.07.2013 Views

Wet SEM Analysis of Quantum dot emulsions - Rice University

Wet SEM Analysis of Quantum dot emulsions - Rice University

Wet SEM Analysis of Quantum dot emulsions - Rice University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The three last Peaks: Cr, Fe, Ni are probably from the stainless steel sample <strong>SEM</strong> holder. The<br />

rest <strong>of</strong> the Peaks are from the emulsion and contamination traces <strong>of</strong> the Water (cleaning sample<br />

Holder with Water).<br />

Figure 5. Energy Dispersive X-Ray Spectroscopy (EDS) <strong>of</strong> Q<strong>dot</strong> emulsion: X-Ray Energy<br />

emission spectra, Elemental <strong>Analysis</strong>, <strong>SEM</strong> secondary electron mode. The last peak Cr was<br />

probably from the stainless steel sample <strong>SEM</strong> holder. The Detector picked up Cd and Se<br />

Signals which reconfirmed that emulsion contained CdSe Q<strong>dot</strong>s. The rest <strong>of</strong> the Peaks are from<br />

the emulsion and contamination traces <strong>of</strong> the Water (cleaning sample Holder with Water).<br />

3. Conclusion<br />

Test run 1 and 2 showed that no useful data can be obtained with the electron beam pointed in<br />

the middle <strong>of</strong> the <strong>emulsions</strong>. Test run 3 and 4 demonstrated that if the electron beam is<br />

pointed at the edge <strong>of</strong> the sample holder that this area plays an important factor as a Interface<br />

reference point in visualizing the <strong>emulsions</strong> surface. The different chamber conditions in Test<br />

run 4 did not visualize the Q<strong>dot</strong> aggregation in the emulsion. However interesting visual<br />

effects in the morphological behavior <strong>of</strong> the surface <strong>of</strong> the emulsion exposed to the different<br />

sample chamber condition could be observed and were described in the Experimental section<br />

<strong>of</strong> this report: The Q<strong>dot</strong> emulsion seemed to be much more stable regarding the bubble “Pop<br />

corn” and “Strawberry” droplet visual effects. One hypotheses might explain the better<br />

physical stability <strong>of</strong> the Q<strong>dot</strong> emulsion when exposed to the heat generated by the electron<br />

beam: The CdSe might act as a kind <strong>of</strong> conductor conduit guiding the beam right through the<br />

emulsion to the bottom like a lightning rod the lightning to the ground. Whereas the blank/<br />

Control without the electrical conductor is longer exposed to the heat <strong>of</strong> the beam causing<br />

violent bubbling. The second more likely and reasonable hypotheses is simply by comparing<br />

the blank/ control emulsion to the Q<strong>dot</strong> emulsion by eye: The Q<strong>dot</strong> emulsion seemed to appear

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!