25.07.2013 Views

July 2006 Volume 9 Number 3 - CiteSeerX

July 2006 Volume 9 Number 3 - CiteSeerX

July 2006 Volume 9 Number 3 - CiteSeerX

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

first version of a digital learning environment as quickly as possible. As a formative design method FODEM<br />

emphasizes research-orientation throughout the entire lifecycle of a DLE. Various thread types can also be<br />

identified. In a cycle of development thread type, the components within a thread have an iterative dependency.<br />

With a cycle of development thread, one can, for instance, represent how a certain development theme<br />

progresses clearly in linear or spiral form. This means that typically a cycle of development thread includes<br />

several instances of components. Figure 1 illustrates how two threads might work together in a development<br />

process. The thread on the left illustrates a cycle of a development thread.<br />

FODEM components<br />

First designs of<br />

courses<br />

NA<br />

I FE<br />

Focus on a<br />

special case<br />

Single course<br />

NA<br />

I FE<br />

Figure 1. Two threads in a development process<br />

In a needs analysis, designers identify the needs and pedagogical objectives of the DLE and the consequent<br />

requirements of a design context. A needs analysis includes the definition of the main concepts, roles and desired<br />

goals of the environment in terms of the thread’s theme. In the early stages of development, the most urgent<br />

tasks are given the highest priority. The definition of pedagogical objectives can be grounded on both theory and<br />

practice. Learning theories, for example, can be a useful resource for suggesting various approaches and ideas to<br />

the designer. But design solutions may also be the product of human innovation and ingenuity, particularly in<br />

circumstances where no relevant theories exist. The requirements of the design context may also be constructed<br />

from extrapolating from experiences of successful practical developments in similar situations in the past. Needs<br />

analysis may also include an analysis of formative evaluations in other threads.<br />

Tasks Identify the design solutions and<br />

main concepts (Kerne, 2002).<br />

Methods Analysis of contextual factors,<br />

learning theories, and practical<br />

experiences. Literature reviews.<br />

Evaluation of experiences from<br />

other threads.<br />

Outcomes Pedagogical and technical design<br />

principles and solutions<br />

Challenges To incorporate and combine the<br />

design ideas from different origins<br />

in an effective and meaningful way<br />

(Abdelraheem, 2003)<br />

Table 2. Summary of the FODEM components<br />

NA I FE<br />

Implement design solutions as<br />

quickly as possible so that<br />

experiments with learners can<br />

take place as soon as possible<br />

(Soloway et al., 1996).<br />

Fast prototyping, sketching,<br />

experimenting (Bahn &<br />

Nauman, 1997).<br />

An environment that is usable<br />

in authentic learning settings<br />

To expose the environment to<br />

users at the right moment.<br />

Identify viable features<br />

by evaluating.<br />

Use of environmental<br />

and experiential analysis,<br />

content analysis.<br />

Information about the<br />

functions of the<br />

environments in future<br />

development<br />

To go beyond the<br />

structure of the design<br />

(Kommers, 2004)<br />

The implementation component is used to implement the design solutions identified in needs analysis. One of the<br />

applied implementation methods is fast prototyping. This is used to test design ideas at an early stage for<br />

information about which design solutions are viable and which are unsuccessful. This can be achieved through<br />

45

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!