25.07.2013 Views

October 2011 Volume 14 Number 4 - Educational Technology ...

October 2011 Volume 14 Number 4 - Educational Technology ...

October 2011 Volume 14 Number 4 - Educational Technology ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

efore they decide whether to adopt it. Therefore, this study suggested that well-designed trainings should be<br />

provided for the employees to familiarize themselves with the fundamental knowledge about how to use the elearning<br />

systems as well as the trial opportunities to build a better understanding in the operational functions. The<br />

trainers’ frequent demonstration of the use of e-learning systems help the employees form positive beliefs and<br />

attitudes, which in turn influences their behavioral intention and actual use of e-learning systems. As such, trainers<br />

should introduce and describe the benefits of e-learning systems and their relevance to their job performances.<br />

Additionally, trainers and system designers of e-learning systems should carefully consider the needs of e-learning<br />

system users and ensure that the e-learning systems effectively meet their job needs and demands.<br />

Conclusions<br />

This study has validated TAM and IDT in the organizational context and provided a further understanding into the<br />

employees’ possible perceptions about the use of e-learning systems. The contribution of this study to e-learning<br />

acceptance research was discussed. While the merits of the TAM were manifested, the findings of this study<br />

provided greater insights when analyzing users’ acceptance and adoption of e-learning systems. As a result, we<br />

proposed that the combination of TAM and IDT models could offer better overall results.<br />

Furthermore, our findings suggested that system developers, designers, and institutional purchasers of e-learning<br />

systems carefully consider the needs of employees and ensure that selected systems effectively meet these demands.<br />

The five innovative characteristics with e-learning systems could be important determinants of user adoption of elearning<br />

systems.<br />

Reference<br />

Agarwal, R. (2000), Individual Acceptance of Information Technologies. <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong> Research and Development,<br />

40, 90-102.<br />

Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1999). Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?<br />

Decision Sciences, 30, 361-391.<br />

Agarwal, R., Sambamurthy, V., & Stair, R. M. (2000). The evolving relationship between general and specific computer efficacy:<br />

An empirical assessment. Information Systems Research, 11(4), 418-430.<br />

Ajzen, I., & Fishbein, M. (1980). Understanding Attitudes and Predicting Social behavior, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.<br />

Arbaugh, J. B. (2002). Managing the on-line classroom: a study of technological and behavioral characteristics of web-based<br />

MBA courses. Journal of High <strong>Technology</strong> Management Research, 13, 203-223.<br />

Arbaugh, J. B., & Duray, R. (2002). Technological and structural characteristics, student learning and satisfaction with web-based<br />

courses: An exploratory study of two on-line MBA programs. Management Learning, 33(3), 331-347.<br />

Carter, L,. & Be´langer, F. (2005). The utilization of e-government services: Citizen trust, innovation and acceptance factors.<br />

Information Systems Journal, 15(1), 5-25.<br />

Chan, T. C. (2005). A Study of the Adoption e-Learning Factors on Taiwan, M.S. Thesis, Chaoyang University of <strong>Technology</strong>.<br />

Chang, S. C., & Tung, F. C. (2008). An empirical investigation of students’ behavioural intentions to use the online learning<br />

course websites. British Journal of <strong>Educational</strong> <strong>Technology</strong>, 39(1), 71-83.<br />

Chau, Y. K., & Hu, J. H. (2001). Information <strong>Technology</strong> Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison<br />

Approach. Decision Sciences, 32(4), 669-719.<br />

Chen, L. D., Gillenson, M. L., & Sherrell, D. L. (2002). Enticing online consumers: An extended technology acceptance<br />

perspective. Information & Management, 39(8), 705-719.<br />

Chin, W. C., & Todd, P. A. (1995). On the use, usefulness and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note<br />

of caution. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 237–246.<br />

Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., &Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical<br />

model. Management Science, 35(8), 982-1003.<br />

DeRouin, R. E., Fritzsche, B. A., & Salas, E. (2005). E-learning in organizations. Journal of Management, 31(6), 920-940.<br />

135

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!