- Page 1 and 2:
October 2011 Volume 14 Number 4
- Page 3 and 4:
Supporting Organizations Centre for
- Page 5 and 6:
Time-Quality Tradeoff of Waiting St
- Page 7 and 8:
Ibáñez, M. B., García, J. J., Ga
- Page 9 and 10:
Situated learning. It states that k
- Page 11 and 12:
executed in the client, the server
- Page 13 and 14:
The participants were twelve non-na
- Page 15 and 16:
Huang, H. M., Rauch, U., & Liaw, S.
- Page 17 and 18:
Theoretical background Feedback, is
- Page 19 and 20:
There are already a number of tools
- Page 21 and 22:
output used were blogs, written by
- Page 23 and 24:
Question Table 2: Perceived Relevan
- Page 25 and 26:
Black, P., & Wiliam, D. (2009). Dev
- Page 27 and 28:
detection, and analysis of affectiv
- Page 29 and 30:
experience is a suitable method of
- Page 31 and 32:
Collins, 1998). The appraisal theor
- Page 33 and 34:
encompasses the finer shades of an
- Page 35 and 36:
and can also track faces with glass
- Page 37 and 38:
Acknowledgements This research was
- Page 39 and 40:
Merill, D. C., Reiser, B. J., Traft
- Page 41 and 42:
to the above-discussed issues of th
- Page 43 and 44:
The annotation part of the SDM onto
- Page 45 and 46:
that enables the office users to ac
- Page 47 and 48:
Figure 4. Semantic document browser
- Page 49 and 50:
to the group’s shared semantic do
- Page 51 and 52:
participants performed less mouse c
- Page 53 and 54:
Bastili, V.R., Gianluigi, C., & Rom
- Page 55 and 56:
esource contribution, enabling conv
- Page 57 and 58:
Semantic Search In contrast to the
- Page 59 and 60:
Participation: P i i i NiVadd Vde
- Page 61 and 62:
and comment on each page as well. T
- Page 63 and 64:
Table 1. Questionnaire results (N=2
- Page 65 and 66:
propose for him, as well as calenda
- Page 67 and 68:
Discussion and Conclusion Collabora
- Page 69 and 70:
Sampson, D. G., & Zervas, P. (2011)
- Page 71 and 72:
Obtaining: the first step of the li
- Page 73 and 74:
process (Palmer & Richardson, 2004)
- Page 75 and 76:
and ratings (the use of star rating
- Page 77 and 78:
(K1) is the number of non-reusable
- Page 79 and 80:
Case 3: The process of reusing a se
- Page 81 and 82:
Washizaki, H., Yamamoto, Y. & Fukaz
- Page 83 and 84:
to examine determinants for pre-ser
- Page 85 and 86:
Overview of the model The first res
- Page 87 and 88:
significance of relationships. All
- Page 89 and 90:
Discussion This study represents a
- Page 91 and 92:
Davis, F., Bagozzi, R., & Warshaw,
- Page 93 and 94:
Ko, C.-C., Chiang, C.-H., Lin, Y.-L
- Page 95 and 96:
Interestingly, the Universal Design
- Page 97 and 98:
Figure 1. Framework of the TriAcces
- Page 99 and 100:
Experiment This experiment aimed to
- Page 101 and 102:
Table 2. Descriptive statistics for
- Page 103 and 104:
Foulds, R., & Camacho, C. (2003). T
- Page 105 and 106:
answer. However, students can choos
- Page 107 and 108:
Hartley & Collins-Brown, 1999; Morl
- Page 109 and 110:
Subjects Figure 4. Partial misconce
- Page 111 and 112:
correct for a four-option MC item i
- Page 113 and 114:
from −3 to 3 for any four-option
- Page 115 and 116:
Kansup, W. (1973). A comparison of
- Page 117 and 118:
The theory of mental models explain
- Page 119 and 120:
computer-mediated counter-arguments
- Page 121 and 122:
Learning in this study refers to, w
- Page 123 and 124:
the experiment process was anonymou
- Page 125 and 126:
supported. However, significant dif
- Page 127 and 128:
Cannon-Bowers, J. A., Salas, E., &
- Page 129 and 130:
Lee, Y.-H., Hsieh, Y.-C., & Hsu, C.
- Page 131 and 132:
Many researchers have conducted emp
- Page 133 and 134:
Trialability Some studies have empi
- Page 135 and 136:
Results Instrument validation Two c
- Page 137 and 138:
In this study, Amos 6.0 was employe
- Page 139 and 140:
Our results strongly supported the
- Page 141 and 142:
Fornell, C., & Larcker, D. F. (1981
- Page 143 and 144:
Kimmerle, J., Moskaliuk, J., & Cres
- Page 145 and 146:
What becomes clear from this short
- Page 147 and 148:
Figure 1. Distribution of informati
- Page 149 and 150:
Results In order to test the hypoth
- Page 151 and 152:
esults of the present study with th
- Page 153 and 154:
Kolbitsch, J., & Maurer, H. (2006).
- Page 155 and 156:
A conceptual framework of this stud
- Page 157 and 158:
eveal positive effects on students
- Page 159 and 160:
learning resources; and able to acc
- Page 161 and 162:
Discussion This study suggests that
- Page 163 and 164:
146). Also, role of constructivist
- Page 165 and 166:
eform strategy, namely, the MOE-Int
- Page 167 and 168: McNaughton, S. (2002). Meeting of m
- Page 169 and 170: Wu, T.-T., Sung, T.-W., Huang, Y.-M
- Page 171 and 172: Ubiquitous English-Reading Learning
- Page 173 and 174: include the number of times and ran
- Page 175 and 176: initial value for the predetermined
- Page 177 and 178: The following Eq. (18) expresses th
- Page 179 and 180: Limitations This experiment adopted
- Page 181 and 182: Table 3 shows the analysis of the p
- Page 183 and 184: enhance learning outcomes, it impor
- Page 185 and 186: Ogata, H., & Yano, Y. (2004a). Cont
- Page 187 and 188: Communication seems to be more effe
- Page 189 and 190: the audience only listened, one whe
- Page 191 and 192: Step 5) Writing the story On the ba
- Page 193 and 194: As indicated in Table 2, the differ
- Page 195 and 196: References Armstrong, S. (2003). Th
- Page 197 and 198: Goh, T.-T. (2011). Exploring Gender
- Page 199 and 200: OPAC has been transformed into AirP
- Page 201 and 202: Perceived Self-Efficacy Figure 3. H
- Page 203 and 204: were asked to rate their confidence
- Page 205 and 206: (2001). The correlation table begin
- Page 207 and 208: Discussion and Implications Note. S
- Page 209 and 210: will become important to identify i
- Page 211 and 212: Parker, A. (2007). SMS - Its use in
- Page 213 and 214: Find the perimeter of the rectangle
- Page 215 and 216: Wait Time Management Issues related
- Page 217: Precision Reduced_Precision ( T T0
- Page 221 and 222: Two criteria have been adopted to e
- Page 223 and 224: Reduced Recall 0.07 0.06 0.05 0.04
- Page 225 and 226: In this work, both recall-oriented
- Page 227 and 228: Tsai, C.-C., Chuang, S.-C., Liang,
- Page 229 and 230: confidence and self-belief in their
- Page 231 and 232: Peng et al. (2006) To explore ISE &
- Page 233 and 234: Torkzadeh, Chang, and Demirhan (200
- Page 235 and 236: educational level, locus of control
- Page 237 and 238: Internet-based learning self-effica
- Page 239 and 240: Though Lee and Lee (2008) did not d
- Page 241 and 242: Regarding the category of ISE resea
- Page 243 and 244: Bandura, A. (1997). Self-efficacy:
- Page 245 and 246: Pintrich, P. R., & de Groot, E. V.
- Page 247 and 248: In formal learning, Safran, Helic,
- Page 249 and 250: that culture is essential when user
- Page 251 and 252: Table 3. Analysis of usage frequenc
- Page 253 and 254: 7 1.16 137.73 0.25 0.29 0.25 Social
- Page 255 and 256: discussions freely. So Korean stude
- Page 257 and 258: Johnson, L., Levine, A., & Smith, R
- Page 259 and 260: Figure 1. The UE Faculty Web Portal
- Page 261 and 262: 2006), and consistency (Sindhuja &
- Page 263 and 264: Independent Variables Dependent Var
- Page 265 and 266: Meanwhile, as shown in Table 4, Ava
- Page 267 and 268: design methods in the development o
- Page 269 and 270:
Pearson, J. M., & Pearson, A. (2008
- Page 271 and 272:
Clewley, N., Chen, S. Y., & Liu, X.
- Page 273 and 274:
As shown in this Table, Holists wil
- Page 275 and 276:
satisfaction or dissatisfaction wit
- Page 277 and 278:
8 I would prefer to learn from huma
- Page 279 and 280:
the examples need to be more practi
- Page 281 and 282:
Brotherton, J. A,. & Abowd, G. D. (
- Page 283 and 284:
Cobos, D. L. (2011). Book review: T