Kahana: what was, what is, what can be. - Legislative Reference ...
Kahana: what was, what is, what can be. - Legislative Reference ...
Kahana: what was, what is, what can be. - Legislative Reference ...
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
Chapter 4<br />
KAHANA TODAY<br />
"The residents are the actual stewards of <strong>Kahana</strong>, not the DLNR."<br />
After three decades of delay and frustration in the implementation of <strong>Kahana</strong> as a<br />
living park, the <strong>Kahana</strong> residents seem understandably wary of further state action. If<br />
they were any other set of state tenants, their attitude toward the State would not <strong>be</strong> of<br />
particular concern to the State – if they did not like the conditions of the lease, they<br />
could terminate them and the State would bring in new lessees to replace them. But<br />
<strong>Kahana</strong> <strong>is</strong> unique in that the State, to complete its plans for a living park in the<br />
ahupua`a, needs the lessees almost as much as the lessees need the State. To meet<br />
the State's goal of <strong>Kahana</strong> as a living park – as not just an archetypal ahupua`a, but as<br />
a representation of th<strong>is</strong> specific ahupua`a, with its particular h<strong>is</strong>tory and culture – the<br />
cooperation and participation of all the <strong>Kahana</strong> residents <strong>is</strong> essential.<br />
<strong>Kahana</strong> Now<br />
What <strong>is</strong> the situation of the <strong>Kahana</strong> residents in 2001? Most of them have built<br />
their homes on their new sites and have had their monthly revocable permits <strong>can</strong>celed<br />
in favor of their new sixty-five-year leases. The vast majority appear to <strong>be</strong> keeping up<br />
with the twenty-five interpretive service hour requirement required by Exhibit C of the<br />
lease, although that continues to <strong>be</strong> a signifi<strong>can</strong>t source of friction. A few are still<br />
working on their homes on their leased lots, and some of these have fallen <strong>be</strong>hind the<br />
building schedule set by the State Parks Div<strong>is</strong>ion of the Department of Land and Natural<br />
Resources (State Parks) and it <strong>is</strong> unclear <strong>what</strong> will eventually unfold. Two people are in<br />
serious arrears on their interpretive services and were recently served with notices of<br />
eviction.<br />
The researcher spoke privately with several <strong>Kahana</strong> residents, and attended a<br />
<strong>Kahana</strong> Adv<strong>is</strong>ory Committee meeting in July 2001 and met additional residents and<br />
community mem<strong>be</strong>rs closely involved with <strong>Kahana</strong>. The researcher obtained additional<br />
input from the meeting, and invited further contact by all residents. In speaking with<br />
various people involved with <strong>Kahana</strong>, both residents and non-residents, it <strong>was</strong><br />
commonly expressed that there were "at least" three different groupings among the<br />
<strong>Kahana</strong> residents, with differing viewpoints on the future of <strong>Kahana</strong>. There <strong>is</strong> some<br />
degree of competition among the various groups, including the most active.<br />
The researcher also spoke with five state parks staff mem<strong>be</strong>rs: the state parks<br />
div<strong>is</strong>ion head; the park manager; the park manager's superv<strong>is</strong>or, who <strong>is</strong> also head of the<br />
interpretive div<strong>is</strong>ion of state parks; the state parks planner assigned to <strong>Kahana</strong>; and<br />
another staff mem<strong>be</strong>r in the interpretive section. It seemed evident from the<br />
d<strong>is</strong>cussions that all of these people truly do care about <strong>Kahana</strong>, in their own ways.<br />
36