10_hans_morten_lossius.pdf (1.7 MB) - Innomed

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Level Therapy/Prevention, Aetiology/Harm 1a SR of RCTs SR of inception cohort studies; validated in different populations 1b Individual RCT Individual inception cohort study with > 80% follow-up; validated in a single population Prognosis Diagnosis Differential diagnosis/symptom prevalence study SR of Level 1 diagnostic studies; with 1b studies from different clinical centres Validating** cohort study with reference standards; or tested within one clinical centre 1c All or none§ All or none case-series Absolute SpPins and SnNouts†† 2a 2b 2c 3a 3b 4 5 SR (with homogeneity*) of cohort studies Individual cohort study (including low quality RCT; e.g., 2 diagnostic studies Exploratory** cohort study with good†††reference standards; CDR† after derivation, or validated only on splitsample§§§ or databases SR of prospective cohort studies Prospective cohort study with good follow-up**** Economic and decision analyses SR of Level 1 economic studies Analysis based on clinically sensible costs or alternatives; systematic review(s) of the evidence; and including multi-way sensitivity analyses All or none case-series Absolute better-value or worse-value analyses †††† SR (with homogeneity*) of 2b and better studies Retrospective cohort study, or poor follow-up SR (with homogeneity*) of Level >2 economic studies Analysis based on clinically sensible costs or alternatives; limited review(s) of the evidence, or single studies; and including multi-way sensitivity analyses "Outcomes" Research Ecological studies Audit or outcomes research Case-series (and poor quality prognostic cohort studies***) Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on physiology, bench research or "first principles" SR (with homogeneity*) of 3b and better studies Non-consecutive study; or without consistently applied reference standards Case-control study, poor or non-independent reference standard Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on physiology, bench research or "first principles" SR (with homogeneity*) of 3b and better studies Non-consecutive cohort study, or very limited population Case-series or superseded reference standards Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on physiology, bench research or "first principles" SR (with homogeneity*) of 3b and better studies Analysis based on limited alternatives or costs, poor quality estimates of data, but including sensitivity analyses incorporating clinically sensible variations. Analysis with no sensitivity analysis Expert opinion without explicit critical appraisal, or based on economic theory or "first principles"
Dr. Thomas Fuller 1654-1734 Gnomologia, 1732 ” Get the facts, or the facts will get you. And when you get them, get them right, or they will get you wrong. ”
Page 1: Kjernedata for akutt syke og skadde
Page 4 and 5: Visjon: Stiftelsen Norsk Luftambula
Page 6 and 7: Det prehospitale paradoks Det er et
Page 10 and 11: Dagens vitenskaplige kunnskapsbase
Page 12 and 13: Årsak Virkning
Page 14 and 15: Støy • Upresise definisjoner •
Page 16 and 17: The challenge is to isolate the eff
Page 18 and 19: Det er en økende forståelse for k
Page 20 and 21: Alvorlig skadde • 35 kjernedata
Page 22 and 23: Spesialistlegebemannet utrykningstj
Page 24 and 25: Fire trinns modifisert nominell gru
Page 26 and 27: Inndeling av data • Fixed system
Page 28 and 29: Datadefinisjonsprosessen Register 1
Page 30 and 31: Validitet Datadefinisjonsprosessen
Page 32: Pre-hospital ETI
Page 35 and 36: Revisiting the value of pre-hospita
Page 37 and 38: EMS system: Response time Provider

10_hans_morten_lossius.pdf (1.7 MB) - Innomed

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?