Intraocular Photodisruption With Picosecond and Nanosecond Laser
Intraocular Photodisruption With Picosecond and Nanosecond Laser
Intraocular Photodisruption With Picosecond and Nanosecond Laser
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
Tissue Effects of <strong>Picosecond</strong> <strong>and</strong> <strong>Nanosecond</strong> <strong>Photodisruption</strong> 3039<br />
b<br />
FIGURE 7. Semithin sections through picosecond laser effects<br />
within the corneal stroma. The pulse energy was 80 jtj.<br />
The distance between laser focus <strong>and</strong> corneal endothelium<br />
was 130 nn\ in (a) <strong>and</strong> 60 fim in (b). Endothelial damage is<br />
marked by arrowheads. The scales correspond to a length of<br />
100/ini.<br />
was located at the level of the retinal pigment epithelium.<br />
Focusing above a retinal vessel led to a hemorrhage<br />
when the distance between the vessel <strong>and</strong> the<br />
laser focus was less than 300 fj.m. When the pulses were<br />
focused onto the retinal pigment epithelium or slightly<br />
behind it, no macroscopic vessel damage could be observed,<br />
even when the laser focus was located directly<br />
below a vessel (arrow in Fig. 10). Figure 11 shows histo-<br />
logic sections through retinal lesions arising when the<br />
distance Ax between the laser focus in the vitreous <strong>and</strong><br />
the vitreoretinal interface was 200 ^m (Fig. 11a) <strong>and</strong><br />
400 fim (Fig. lib), respectively. In both cases, damage<br />
to the neuroretina <strong>and</strong> the outer nuclear layer, probably<br />
caused by the cavitation bubble dynamics, is visible.<br />
For Ax > 500 /mi, no retinal damage was observed.<br />
This means that the damage range is about half a millimeter<br />
at a laser pulse energy of 200 /*J.<br />
DISCUSSION<br />
Thresholds for Plasma Formation<br />
Table 1 shows that the threshold energy for plasma<br />
formation in clear ocular media is, on average, 12<br />
times lower for ps pulses than for ns pulses. This<br />
agrees quite well with the factor of 13 reported by us<br />
for distilled water. 6 Docchio et al 9 presented similar<br />
values: a factor of 10 for calf vitreous <strong>and</strong> of 14 for<br />
distilled water. The variation in the absolute values of<br />
the breakdown thresholds for different tissues observed<br />
at constant pulse duration can partly be attributed<br />
to different tissue properties, <strong>and</strong> to some extent<br />
to the different experimental configurations used for<br />
the investigation of the various tissues (see Fig. 2).<br />
The breakdown thresholds in cataractous lens nuclei<br />
(Fig. 3) are always independent of the pulse dura-<br />
FIGURE 8. Intrastromal cavities produced by a series of ps<br />
pulses. The laser light was incident from the right. The pulse<br />
energy was 80 /xj in (a) <strong>and</strong> 300 n] in (b). The pulses were<br />
applied with 10 Hz repetition rate when the corneal specimen<br />
was moved in a vertical direction. The scale represents<br />
0.5 mm. The photographs were taken immediately (