30.07.2013 Views

ppt slides - MCD Biology

ppt slides - MCD Biology

ppt slides - MCD Biology

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>MCD</strong>B 4650 Class 23<br />

Patterning of the nervous system<br />

Learning goals:<br />

• Describe the general mechanisms by which axons find their targets,<br />

and give examples of kinds of molecules involved.<br />

• Explain how both inhibitory and excitatory cues can determine axonal<br />

pathfinding.<br />

• Interpret and design experiments that would demonstrate the<br />

importance of certain molecules in pathfinding.<br />

Reminder: Exam next Monday 6-7:30 pm<br />

Review session this Friday at 2 pm, B121


Defects in neuronal patterning:<br />

real examples of problems in the signaling pathways<br />

Lack of Shh<br />

Holoprosencephaly (fusion of the two sides of the brain into one)


Axons are extremely<br />

active!<br />

Anatomy of a neuron


Do neurons follow a trail of breadcrumbs?<br />

A series of signposts? A beacon?


Different groups of motor neurons<br />

innervate different classes of muscles<br />

Why?<br />

Cells in<br />

different areas<br />

of spinal cord<br />

could be<br />

committed OR<br />

Local<br />

molecules<br />

could be<br />

attracting the<br />

axons<br />

differently


Expression of different transcription factors in different<br />

regions of spinal cord


Known Mechanisms of Axon Pathfinding<br />

• Non-specific, generalized<br />

outgrowth cues<br />

(permissive):<br />

Fibronectin, laminin<br />

• Previously pioneered<br />

pathway (adhesive)<br />

N-CAM, cadherins,<br />

fasciclins<br />

• Target-Specific pathfinding:<br />

• adhesive or diffusible, repulsive or attractive


In amphibians, axons from the retina project to a brain<br />

region called the tectum<br />

Visual processing center of frog brain<br />

If the connections<br />

between retina and<br />

tectum are cut, they<br />

re-grow, providing a<br />

model for studying<br />

how axons know where<br />

to grow


Experiments that led to the hunt for guidance cues<br />

• Shine a light on retina, record electrical activity from tectum<br />

• a cell in one part of the retina always produced activity in a<br />

particular part of the tectum<br />

• Inject a visible label into neurons<br />

• an injected cell from the retina always projected to a<br />

particular place in the tectum<br />

Conclusion: Cells<br />

in retina have<br />

specific targets<br />

in the tectum


But do these cells “know” their fate<br />

(ie, are they committed to project to a certain location?<br />

nasal<br />

temporal<br />

Nasal axons: posterior tectum<br />

Temporal axons: anterior tectum<br />

Dorsal axons: lateral tectum<br />

Ventral axons: medial tectum<br />

To test commitment (1960s):<br />

Sperry and colleagues removed the eyes of frogs, severing the axonal<br />

connections.<br />

Replace eyes, rotated 180 degrees relative to their normal position


Sperry’s experiment and result:


What does this experiment demonstrate about<br />

retinal-tectal projection?<br />

a. The retinal neurons are committed to target<br />

a particular region of tectum<br />

b. The retinal neurons are not committed to<br />

target a particular region of the tectum.<br />

c. The location of the retinal neurons, not<br />

their identity, determines their path<br />

d. The neurons target the tectum randomly


Why do the axons know where to grow<br />

despite the fact that they are now in a<br />

different starting location?<br />

They have receptors that bind ligands in the environment;<br />

this information system allows them to navigate.<br />

If a neuron is committed to its fate, will its axon always go to<br />

the correct location?<br />

Not necessarily: We have to consider the molecular composition<br />

within the axon, as well as the molecular composition of the<br />

environment, and of the target!


Beacon or bread crumbs?<br />

• Chemotaxis (Beacon)<br />

long range response to a gradient of a molecule<br />

• Haptotaxis or contact-mediated guidance (bread crumbs)<br />

short range response to contact with cell/substrate (can also be<br />

a gradient)


A sampling of axon guidance molecules (do not memorize!)<br />

Ligands:<br />

always in<br />

the environment<br />

Receptors: always on<br />

the surface of the axon<br />

From B. Dickson, Science V 298, pp. 1959-1964.<br />

Domain names can be found at http://smart.emblheidelberg.de/browse.shtml


CHEMOTAXIS: growth of neurons towards a specific target based on<br />

the concnetration of a diffusible ligand<br />

How did scientists identify these molecules and figure out how they<br />

worked?


After purification of possible molecules, express these molecules in fibroblasts<br />

(normally do not generate any axon outgrowth on their own)<br />

Floor plate Fibros +<br />

Vector<br />

(control)<br />

Fibros +<br />

Netrin-1<br />

Fibros +<br />

Netrin-2


Floor<br />

plate<br />

Fibros +<br />

Vector<br />

(control)<br />

Fibros +<br />

Netrin-1<br />

Fibros +<br />

Netrin-2<br />

What else would you want to do?<br />

What can you conclude?<br />

a. Only netrin 1 is a specific<br />

chemoattractant for these<br />

neurons<br />

b. Only netrin 2 is a specific<br />

chemoattractant for these<br />

neurons<br />

c. Both netrin 1 and 2 are<br />

specific chemoattractants<br />

for these neurons<br />

d.Both netrin 1 and 2 are<br />

chemoattractants, but not<br />

necessarily specific


mRNA localization shows<br />

• a gradual gradient of Netrin-2 and Shh<br />

• a steep gradient of Netrin 1, in and directly adjacent to the floorplate


Summary of axon guidance molecules:<br />

• They often exist in a gradient, either diffusible<br />

or membrane bound<br />

• They can be attractive to one set of neurons and<br />

repulsive to another set dependent on the<br />

combination of factors present in any given neuron<br />

• Let’s return to the retino-tectal projection to<br />

explore this model further


A model for axon targeting: the retino-tectal projection<br />

in amphibians<br />

• The information from one eye is sent exclusively to the opposite<br />

side of the brain (right retina to left tectum<br />

• Each RGC axon projects to a specific spot within the tectum<br />

• Targeting within the tectum is due to haptotaxis (membrane bound<br />

ligands)


From this experiment, we could conclude:<br />

a. The nasal axons are attracted by<br />

molecules in both anterior and posterior<br />

tectum.<br />

b. The nasal axons are not repelled by<br />

molecules in the posterior tectum.<br />

c. The temporal axons are repelled by<br />

molecules in posterior tectum cells.<br />

d. The temporal axons are attracted by<br />

molecules in the anterior tectum cells.<br />

e. Each set of axons is attracted to a<br />

specific region in the tectum by a<br />

different attractive molecule<br />

To really be confident, you need more information


What to do next?<br />

• Watch the axons as they encounter Ephrin ligand<br />

• Purify proteins from different regions of the tectum.<br />

• Identify proteins present<br />

• Test the proteins to see if they act as guidance<br />

molecules<br />

• Discovered the Ephrin receptor and ligand—work through<br />

contact-mediated guidance (haptotaxis)<br />

• Ephrin Receptor was found in different concentrations<br />

across the retina, and the ligand in different<br />

concentrations across the tectum!


Ephrins and their receptors are present in<br />

a gradient across both the tectum and the retina<br />

Eph receptor<br />

in the retina<br />

Ephrin ligand<br />

in the tectum


High EphR<br />

(low to high Eph ligand)<br />

Low EphR<br />

Why do the axons from the nasal retina go to the<br />

posterior tectum, rather than being stopped in the<br />

anterior tectum?<br />

a. The nasal axons are more sensitive to the Eph ligands<br />

b. The nasal axons are less sensitive to the ligands<br />

c. The nasal axons are unresponsive to the Eph ligand<br />

d. None of the above


Watching neurons as they encountered Eph targets also showed<br />

“repulsion”<br />

this was the first example of repulsive activity working as<br />

guidance<br />

In this case, repulsion is based on both the density of the receptors,<br />

and the concentration of the ligand<br />

Axons with a low concentration of receptors are not repelled by a low<br />

concentration of ligand, so they project to the posterior tectum, and<br />

synapse there.


Cool cre-lox system for labeling neurons and their axonal projections

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!