Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act Restrictions and ...

More documents

Recommendations

Info

Appendix III: Detailed Information on Planned FLTFA Land Sales through 2010, as Reported by BLM State Offices State/Field Office Acreage Fair market value Sale method Disposal reason Elko Field Office 640 120,000 Competitive a Elko Field Office 640 125,000 Competitive a Elko Field Office 640 115,000 Competitive a Elko Field Office 640 110,000 Competitive a Elko Field Office 360 75,000 Competitive a Elko Field Office 1,440 200,000 Competitive a Elko Field Office 2,560 300,000 Competitive a Elko Field Office 80 50,000 Competitive a Ely Field Office 217 217,000 Direct a Ely Field Office 159 160,000 Competitive a Las Vegas Field Office 292.46 965,118 Direct a Winnemucca Field Office 382.5 396,000 Direct a Winnemucca Field Office 1,440 144,000 Competitive a Winnemucca Field Office 440 44,000 Competitive a Winnemucca Field Office 1,214 212,000 Competitive a Winnemucca Field Office New Mexico 40 120,000 Direct a Farmington Field Office 80 2,000,000 Direct Competitive public interest, expansion of community and economic development Las Cruces District Office 166.59 a Competitive Competitive public interest, expansion of community and economic development Las Cruces District Office 180 a Competitive Competitive public interest, expansion of community and economic development Las Cruces District Office 139.77 a Competitive Competitive public interest, expansion of community and economic development Las Cruces District Office 140.39 a Competitive Competitive public interest, expansion of community and economic development Las Cruces District Office 400 3,500,000 Competitive Competitive public interest, expansion of community and economic development Las Cruces District Office 160 a Competitive Competitive public interest, expansion of community and economic development Rio Puerco Field Office 0.48 a Direct To resolve an unintentional, unauthorized occupancy Taos Field Office Utah 6 a Competitive Competitive public interest, expansion of community and economic development Kanab Field Office 120 170,000 Modified competitive Isolated parcel Moab Field Office 50 50,000 Direct To resolve unauthorized use (agricultural) Richfield Field Office 4.82 a Direct To resolve unauthorized use (occupancy) St. George Field Office 145 14,000,000 Competitive a Page 65 GAO-08-196 Federal Land Management
Appendix III: Detailed Information on Planned FLTFA Land Sales through 2010, as Reported by BLM State Offices State/Field Office Acreage Fair market value Sale method Disposal reason Vernal Field Office 62.5 1,000 Direct Accommodate use on adjoining lands (sewage treatment ponds) Vernal Field Office Wyoming 30 13,450 Direct Resolve unauthorized use (agricultural) Casper Field Office 20 a Direct Community expansion Kemmerer Field Office 120 a Direct Landfill expansion Newcastle Field Office 1.34 a Direct Resolution of trespass Newcastle Field Office 2.27 a Competitive Community expansion Rawlins Field Office 640 a Modified competitive Community expansion Rawlins Field Office 40 a Modified competitive Community expansion Rock Springs Field Office 40 a Direct Resolution of an occupancy trespass Rock Springs Field Office 820 a Direct Plant expansion Rock Springs Field Office 39.1 a Undetermined Resolution of an occupancy trespass Rock Springs Field Office 157.24 a Competitive Industrial expansion Source: GAO analysis of information from BLM’s state offices. a Information not provided. Page 66 GAO-08-196 Federal Land Management
Page 1 and 2:
GAO February 2008 GAO-08-196 United
Page 3 and 4:
Contents Letter 1 Results in Brief
Page 5 and 6:
Abbreviations BLM Bureau of Land Ma
Page 7 and 8:
providing security, and protecting
Page 9 and 10:
evenue to acquire specific parcels
Page 11 and 12:
BLM faces several challenges to rai
Page 13 and 14:
Background Federal Land Sales Autho
Page 15 and 16:
Federal Land Acquisition Funding ti
Page 17 and 18:
FLTFA Requirements on Use of Revenu
Page 19 and 20: BLM Has Raised Most FLTFA Revenue f
Page 21 and 22: Figure 3: FLTFA Revenue by Fiscal Y
Page 23 and 24: BLM Faces Several Challenges to Fut
Page 25 and 26: Most BLM States Have Planned FLTFA
Page 27 and 28: Figure 5: BLM “North Fork” 167-
Page 29 and 30: FLTFA’s Restriction on Land Avail
Page 31 and 32: Agencies Have Purchased Few Parcels
Page 33 and 34: Table 4: Status of FLTFA Land Acqui
Page 35 and 36: Figure 7: Part of an Inholding in t
Page 37 and 38: Agency State Federally designated a
Page 39 and 40: The nomination that was withdrawn b
Page 41 and 42: State-Level Process Has Not Yet Res
Page 43 and 44: BLM Reports Spending $3.2 Million o
Page 45 and 46: Agencies Face Challenges in Complet
Page 47 and 48: Compliance with Specific Provisions
Page 49 and 50: The Agencies Have Yet to Establish
Page 51 and 52: Matters for Congressional Considera
Page 53 and 54: If you or your staff have questions
Page 55 and 56: Appendix I: Objectives, Scope, and
Page 57 and 58: Appendix I: Objectives, Scope, and
Page 59 and 60: Appendix II: Completed FLTFA Land S
Page 69: Appendix III: Detailed Information
Page 73 and 74: Appendix IV: Comments from the Depa
Page 75 and 76: Appendix V: GAO Contact and Staff A
show all

Federal Land Transaction Facilitation Act Restrictions and ...

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

Delete template?

Save as template?