Spring 2008 Voice - The Dachshund Club of America, Inc.
Spring 2008 Voice - The Dachshund Club of America, Inc.
Spring 2008 Voice - The Dachshund Club of America, Inc.
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
A new section <strong>of</strong> "<strong>The</strong> <strong>Voice</strong>" where editorials and commentary may be posted.<br />
Before being considered for publication, all articles must be submitted to the<br />
Trial Advisory Committee and will be reviewed for content by the three<br />
members <strong>of</strong> the committee.<br />
FIELD CHAMPION STAKES<br />
<strong>The</strong> January issue <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Voice</strong> contained an opinion piece submitted by Sherry Ruggieri entitled “Oh Split!."<br />
This article provided encouragement for clubs to make the decision to run both Field Champion Dog and Field<br />
Champion Bitch stakes, rather than a Combined Field Champion stake. <strong>The</strong>n "<strong>Voice</strong>" editor Larry Gohlke<br />
allowed that counter arguments would be entertained in subsequent issues. To that end, we submit a sampling<br />
<strong>of</strong> comments received by the TAC. Some correspondents requested to remain anonymous.<br />
“My club divided the FC stake when we had few rabbits, but prefers to run field champions as a combined<br />
stake.”<br />
“<strong>The</strong>re is extra difficulty in finding field champion judges – it’s even harder when you split the stakes. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />
also the extra fee for judges / prizes / rosettes (Not to mention judges' meals) to consider when you are the one<br />
assuming financial responsibility to your club.”<br />
"<strong>The</strong> field champion stake should be a competitive one among field champions, otherwise we should be talking<br />
about a Bitch Field Champion and a Dog Field Champion title."<br />
“<strong>The</strong> simple preference to finish a trial earlier in the day is also not a reason to split unless it is necessary.”<br />
From Patt Nance:<br />
<strong>The</strong> <strong>Voice</strong><br />
Forum<br />
“Regarding the splitting <strong>of</strong> Field Champion stakes, my perspective is different than the thoughtful, wellarticulated<br />
article published in the last <strong>Voice</strong>. (Splitting FC stakes, <strong>of</strong> course, refers to running Field<br />
Champions in classes divided by sex - FC Dogs, FC Bitches - instead <strong>of</strong> as one combined-sex class.)<br />
<strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> advocating for division <strong>of</strong> all Field Champion stakes, if not the intent, is a push toward the<br />
'generic' field trial. I am hoping we will avoid that.<br />
I like that some clubs split the Field Champion classes for I find smaller classes and more placement<br />
opportunities very enjoyable.<br />
And I like that some clubs run Field Champions as combined stakes, too, for I relish opportunities to win<br />
or place in large classes and find them very enjoyable.<br />
(And I like the Michigan weekend where there is one trial over two days and the Buckeye weekend that<br />
puts a special spotlight on Field Champions...)<br />
All weekends, with their various grounds, judges, trial committees, and competitors, are fun but I think<br />
it adds to the flavor when trials and classes are different beyond those entities. I appreciate the 'spice to<br />
the sport' added when clubs are willing to do things differently.<br />
Please, let us not advocate for sameness throughout. I, for one, enjoy a little field trial variety.”<br />
SPRING <strong>2008</strong> 28 <strong>of</strong> 37