06.08.2013 Views

Spring 2008 Voice - The Dachshund Club of America, Inc.

Spring 2008 Voice - The Dachshund Club of America, Inc.

Spring 2008 Voice - The Dachshund Club of America, Inc.

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

A new section <strong>of</strong> "<strong>The</strong> <strong>Voice</strong>" where editorials and commentary may be posted.<br />

Before being considered for publication, all articles must be submitted to the<br />

Trial Advisory Committee and will be reviewed for content by the three<br />

members <strong>of</strong> the committee.<br />

FIELD CHAMPION STAKES<br />

<strong>The</strong> January issue <strong>of</strong> the <strong>Voice</strong> contained an opinion piece submitted by Sherry Ruggieri entitled “Oh Split!."<br />

This article provided encouragement for clubs to make the decision to run both Field Champion Dog and Field<br />

Champion Bitch stakes, rather than a Combined Field Champion stake. <strong>The</strong>n "<strong>Voice</strong>" editor Larry Gohlke<br />

allowed that counter arguments would be entertained in subsequent issues. To that end, we submit a sampling<br />

<strong>of</strong> comments received by the TAC. Some correspondents requested to remain anonymous.<br />

“My club divided the FC stake when we had few rabbits, but prefers to run field champions as a combined<br />

stake.”<br />

“<strong>The</strong>re is extra difficulty in finding field champion judges – it’s even harder when you split the stakes. <strong>The</strong>re is<br />

also the extra fee for judges / prizes / rosettes (Not to mention judges' meals) to consider when you are the one<br />

assuming financial responsibility to your club.”<br />

"<strong>The</strong> field champion stake should be a competitive one among field champions, otherwise we should be talking<br />

about a Bitch Field Champion and a Dog Field Champion title."<br />

“<strong>The</strong> simple preference to finish a trial earlier in the day is also not a reason to split unless it is necessary.”<br />

From Patt Nance:<br />

<strong>The</strong> <strong>Voice</strong><br />

Forum<br />

“Regarding the splitting <strong>of</strong> Field Champion stakes, my perspective is different than the thoughtful, wellarticulated<br />

article published in the last <strong>Voice</strong>. (Splitting FC stakes, <strong>of</strong> course, refers to running Field<br />

Champions in classes divided by sex - FC Dogs, FC Bitches - instead <strong>of</strong> as one combined-sex class.)<br />

<strong>The</strong> effect <strong>of</strong> advocating for division <strong>of</strong> all Field Champion stakes, if not the intent, is a push toward the<br />

'generic' field trial. I am hoping we will avoid that.<br />

I like that some clubs split the Field Champion classes for I find smaller classes and more placement<br />

opportunities very enjoyable.<br />

And I like that some clubs run Field Champions as combined stakes, too, for I relish opportunities to win<br />

or place in large classes and find them very enjoyable.<br />

(And I like the Michigan weekend where there is one trial over two days and the Buckeye weekend that<br />

puts a special spotlight on Field Champions...)<br />

All weekends, with their various grounds, judges, trial committees, and competitors, are fun but I think<br />

it adds to the flavor when trials and classes are different beyond those entities. I appreciate the 'spice to<br />

the sport' added when clubs are willing to do things differently.<br />

Please, let us not advocate for sameness throughout. I, for one, enjoy a little field trial variety.”<br />

SPRING <strong>2008</strong> 28 <strong>of</strong> 37

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!