10.08.2013 Views

Introduction to Colossians: Authorship, Date, Audience - Crain Home

Introduction to Colossians: Authorship, Date, Audience - Crain Home

Introduction to Colossians: Authorship, Date, Audience - Crain Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Interpretation 2<br />

He then urges them <strong>to</strong> walk worthily of their calling:<br />

Col 2:6 As ye have therefore received Christ Jesus the Lord,<br />

so walk ye in him:<br />

Col 2:7 Rooted and built up in him, and stablished in the<br />

faith, as ye have been taught, abounding therein with<br />

thanksgiving.<br />

In back of this admonition is the possibility of relapse in<strong>to</strong> old systems and<br />

old ways. The rest of the chapter then lists a number of teachings unworthy<br />

of Christ and the gospel. The fellowship of Colosse and the Laodiceans are<br />

warned against false teachers, and Paul reminds them the fullness of the<br />

divine is in Jesus (9). In Christ is full perfection (10), indeed, everything<br />

that is needed (11-15). In Christ is the circumcision not made with hands<br />

(11), a co-burial and resurrection (12). The chasm between Jew and gentile<br />

is removed (14). Salvation comes by holding fast <strong>to</strong> Christ (18). Condemned<br />

practices include empty words, the teaching of men, and all that is opposed<br />

<strong>to</strong> God (8). Evils <strong>to</strong> be avoided include self-inflicted suffering (18), angel<br />

worship (18), mere human wisdom (18), and austerities (21). The<br />

Intervarsity Press Commentary structures the rest of chapter two in<strong>to</strong> two<br />

main sections of theological and ethical argument:<br />

http://crain.english.mwsc.edu/colossians/interpretation_2.htm (6 of 18)6/17/2003 8:17:57 AM<br />

Following this pattern, <strong>Colossians</strong> contains two sharp<br />

discussions. The first discussion is theological (2:4-23): Paul<br />

challenges the legitimacy of the theological convictions that<br />

underlie the competing understanding of Christian faith in<br />

Colosse. The second discussion is mainly ethical (3:1--4:1):<br />

Paul draws upon moral tradition (paraenesis) <strong>to</strong> describe the<br />

character of Christian life that is now imperiled by the false<br />

teaching.<br />

The polemical and theological discussion is divided in<strong>to</strong> two<br />

subsections, each presenting an argument against a principal<br />

ingredient of the false teaching. In 2:4-8, the apostle<br />

introduces the first problem that threatens the readers' faith. I<br />

call it sophistry: the use of an elegant vocabulary in finesounding<br />

arguments <strong>to</strong> deceive an unsuspecting audience<br />

(2:4). According <strong>to</strong> Paul, certain Christian teachers at Colosse<br />

promote a philosophy of religion that consists of human<br />

traditions and centers on the basic principles of this world

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!