10.08.2013 Views

Introduction to Colossians: Authorship, Date, Audience - Crain Home

Introduction to Colossians: Authorship, Date, Audience - Crain Home

Introduction to Colossians: Authorship, Date, Audience - Crain Home

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

<strong>Home</strong> Page<br />

the mystery cults which professed new thought with a<br />

world view that "sought <strong>to</strong> explain everything on the<br />

assumption that matter was essentially evil and that the<br />

good God could only <strong>to</strong>uch evil matter by means of a<br />

series of aeons or emanations so far removed from him<br />

as <strong>to</strong> prevent contamination by God and yet with<br />

enough power <strong>to</strong> create evil matter." These Gnostics<br />

(hoi gnostikoi, the knowing ones) with their<br />

philosophic speculations applied their theory of the<br />

universe <strong>to</strong> the Person of Christ. Many <strong>to</strong>day are<br />

content <strong>to</strong> deny sin, disease, death and evil in spite of<br />

the evidence <strong>to</strong> the contrary. The issue was so grave<br />

that Epaphras journeyed all the way <strong>to</strong> Rome <strong>to</strong> seek<br />

Paul’s wisdom and help<br />

http://www.abideinchrist.com/messages/colintro.html<br />

8. J. Hamp<strong>to</strong>n Keathley III, Th.M.<br />

1998<br />

http://crain.english.mwsc.edu/colossians/index.htm (9 of 38)6/17/2003 8:16:07 AM<br />

Author and Title:<br />

Because of the greetings in 1:2, <strong>Colossians</strong> became<br />

known as Pros Kolossaeis, “To the <strong>Colossians</strong>.” As<br />

with the other epistles of Paul surveyed thus far, both<br />

the external and internal evidence strongly support<br />

Paul’s authorship. But the authorship of this epistle<br />

has been doubted by some on the grounds of the<br />

vocabulary and the nature of the heresy refuted in this<br />

epistle. Exposi<strong>to</strong>r’s Bible Commentary has an<br />

excellent summary of the key issues involving the<br />

authorship and date of <strong>Colossians</strong>.<br />

That <strong>Colossians</strong> is a genuine letter of Paul is not<br />

usually disputed. In the early church, all who speak on<br />

the subject of authorship ascribe it <strong>to</strong> Paul. In the 19th<br />

century, however, some thought that the heresy refuted<br />

in ch. 2 was second-century Gnosticism. But a careful<br />

analysis of ch. 2 shows that the heresy there referred <strong>to</strong><br />

is noticeably less developed than the Gnosticism of<br />

leading Gnostic teachers of the second and third<br />

centuries. Also, the seeds of what later became the fullblown<br />

Gnosticism of the second century were present

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!