10.08.2013 Views

Is Neonatale Screening op Mucoviscidose aangewezen in België?

Is Neonatale Screening op Mucoviscidose aangewezen in België?

Is Neonatale Screening op Mucoviscidose aangewezen in België?

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

2 Cystic Fibrosis Neonatal <strong>Screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> KCE Reports 132<br />

5.2 EARLIER REFERRAL TO A CF CENTRE. ............................................................................................. 38<br />

5.2.1 How important is it ? ..................................................................................................................... 38<br />

5.2.2 Room for improvement <strong>in</strong> Belgium ............................................................................................ 38<br />

5.3 OPTIMIZING QUALITY OF CF CARE IN BELGIUM ........................................................................ 39<br />

5.3.1 Caveat : compar<strong>in</strong>g data from different countries is difficult. ............................................... 39<br />

5.3.2 Selected data ................................................................................................................................... 39<br />

5.3.3 Scand<strong>in</strong>avia : the best outcomes without NBS programs. ..................................................... 42<br />

5.3.4 Quality of CF care <strong>in</strong> <strong>in</strong>dustrialized countries is heterogeneous ......................................... 42<br />

6 SCREENING STRATEGIES .......................................................................................... 45<br />

6.1 LITERATURE ............................................................................................................................................... 45<br />

6.2 DESCRIPTION OF THE VARIOUS PROTOCOLS ............................................................................ 45<br />

6.2.1 IRT issues ......................................................................................................................................... 48<br />

6.2.2 <strong>Screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> algorithms ...................................................................................................................... 51<br />

6.3 DIAGNOSIS THROUGH CF NEONATAL SCREENING ................................................................ 58<br />

6.3.1 Sweat test ........................................................................................................................................ 58<br />

6.3.2 Inconclusive diagnosis .................................................................................................................... 59<br />

6.4 INTERNATIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS ........................................................................................ 61<br />

6.4.1 Australasian paediatric respiratory group (2005) .................................................................... 61<br />

6.4.2 Cystic Fibrosis Foundation Consensus Report (2008) ........................................................... 61<br />

6.4.3 Eur<strong>op</strong>ean best practice guidel<strong>in</strong>es (2009) ................................................................................. 61<br />

6.4.4 Newborn screen<strong>in</strong>g of cystic fibrosis <strong>in</strong> France (2009) .......................................................... 62<br />

6.4.5 Laboratory Guide to Newborn <strong>Screen<strong>in</strong>g</strong> <strong>in</strong> the UK for Cystic Fibrosis (2009) ............. 62<br />

7 BELGIAN SITUATION ................................................................................................. 63<br />

7.1 CURRENT SCREENING INFRASTRUCTURES .................................................................................. 63<br />

7.2 CHOICE OF A STRATEGY ..................................................................................................................... 63<br />

7.2.1 IRT measurement ........................................................................................................................... 65<br />

7.2.2 Belgian genetics ............................................................................................................................... 65<br />

7.2.3 Consideration of PAP measurement .......................................................................................... 69<br />

8 STUDY OF ETHICAL AND LEGAL ASPECTS ......................................................... 73<br />

8.1 INTRODUCTION ...................................................................................................................................... 73<br />

8.2 FREE CONSENT AND INFORMATION BEFORE AND AFTER SCREENING .......................... 73<br />

8.2.1 Free consent .................................................................................................................................... 73<br />

8.2.2 Information before the screen<strong>in</strong>g ............................................................................................... 74<br />

8.2.3 Information after the first screen<strong>in</strong>g test .................................................................................. 75<br />

8.3 PRIVACY, STORING AND RESEARCH ON DNA............................................................................ 75<br />

8.3.1 Privacy ............................................................................................................................................... 75<br />

8.3.2 Stock<strong>in</strong>g the newborn’s tissue for research ............................................................................. 76<br />

8.4 UNAVOIDABLE DETECTION OF CARRIERS ................................................................................... 77<br />

8.4.1 Implications for children ............................................................................................................... 77<br />

8.4.2 Implications for parents ................................................................................................................ 77<br />

8.4.3 Use of carrier status for parental reproductive decision-mak<strong>in</strong>g ........................................ 77<br />

8.5 THE RISK FOR A LEGAL PURSUIT IN CASE OF FALSE POSITIVE/FALSE NEGATIVE TEST<br />

RESULTS ....................................................................................................................................................... 78<br />

8.5.1 Introductory remark ...................................................................................................................... 78<br />

8.5.2 Liability for false positive/false negative test results: an exercise <strong>in</strong> the dark. ................... 78<br />

8.6 LEGISLATION APPLICABLE TO CF NBS ............................................................................................ 80<br />

9 REVIEW OF THE COST-EFFECTIVENESS LITERATURE ..................................... 85<br />

9.1 METHODS ................................................................................................................................................... 85<br />

9.1.1 Literature search strategy ............................................................................................................ 85<br />

9.1.2 Selection criteria ............................................................................................................................. 85<br />

9.1.3 Selection process ............................................................................................................................ 86<br />

9.2 OVERVIEW AND DISCUSSION OF ECONOMIC EVALUATIONS ............................................. 87<br />

9.2.1 Dauph<strong>in</strong>ais, 1992 341 ........................................................................................................................ 87<br />

9.2.2 Farrell et al., 1992 342 ...................................................................................................................... 88

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!