Ground Water Issue Phytoremediation of Contaminated ... - CLU-IN

More documents

Recommendations

Info

24 Table 1. continued CONTAMINANT MEDIUM PROCESS CONCENTRATION 1 PLANT 2 RESULTS/NOTES Cobalt Soil Phytoextraction NA NA McGrath, 1998 REFERENCE Although Co (and Cu) hyperaccumulators exist, McGrath indicates that no demonstration of phytoextraction of Co and Cu has been made. Copper Soil Phytoextraction NA NA McGrath, 1998 Although Cu (and Co) hyperaccumulators exist, McGrath indicates that no demonstration of phytoextraction of Cu and Co has been made. Phytostabilization 25 to 15,400 ppm in mine tailings. Perennial grasses such as Agrostis tenuis and Festuca rubra. Agrostic tenuis cv. Parys is available commercially. Smith and Bradshaw, 1979 Naturally-occurring metal-tolerant populations of grasses grew well, provided that fertilization was sufficient. Water Rhizofiltration 6 mg/L Cu(II) Indian mustard Dushenkov et al., 1995 Bioaccumulation coefficient of 490 after 24 hours. 1 to 16 mg/L Water milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) Wang et al., 1996 Minimum residual concentration of about 0.01 mg/L. Lead Soil Phytoextraction At 0 to 15 cm depth: 40% of site had >400 mg/kg; 7% of site had >1000 mg/kg 0.1 to 10 mg/L Duckweed, water hyacinth Zayed et al., 1998; Zhu et al., 1999 Bioconcentration factor of 200 to 800, in duckweed whole plant tissue. Maximum water hyacinth bioconcentration factor was 595. Indian mustard Blaylock et al., 1999 “Magic Marker” site. After 3 crops, 28% area had > 400 mg/kg, 0% area had > 1000 mg/kg. The 15-30 cm and 30-45 cm depths did not change significantly. Plant shoot lead was 3000 mg/kg. Projected cost is 50-75% of traditional costs. 625 g/g (dry weight) in sand Brassica juncea cultivars Kumar et al., 1995 The best cultivar could theoretically remove 630 kg Pb/ha if the shoots were harvested. Phytostabilization 625 mg/kg Brassica juncea seedlings Salt et al., 1995 Leachate concentration was 740 mg/L without plants and was 22 mg/L with plants.
25 Table 1. continued CONTAMINANT MEDIUM PROCESS CONCENTRATION 1 PLANT 2 RESULTS/NOTES REFERENCE Water Rhizofiltration 2 to 500 mg/L in hydroponic solution Indian mustard Dushenkov et al., 1995 Bioaccumulation coefficient of 563 after 24 hours for 2 mg/L solution. 0.096 to 9.6 M (20 to 2000 g/L) in hydroponic solution Bioaccumulation coefficients of 500 to 2000. Indian mustard Salt et al., 1997 1 to 16 mg/L Water milfoil (Myriophyllum spicatum) Wang et al., 1996 Minimum residual concentration was below 0.004 mg/L. Manganese Water Rhizofiltration 1 mg/L in hydroponic solution Twelve wetland plants Qian et al., 1999 Smart weed (Polygonum hydropiperoides L.) was most effective of the plants tested in removing Mn, and could remove 306 g Mn/ha per day. Mercury Water Rhizofiltration 1 mg/L in hydroponic solution Twelve wetland plants Qian et al., 1999 Soil and ground water Smart weed (Polygonum hydropiperoides L.) was most effective of the plants tested in removing Hg, and could remove 71 g Hg/ha per day. Phytovolatilization 5 M Hg(II) (1 mg/L) in hydroponic solution Genetically altered Arabidopsis thaliana and tobacco (Nicotiana tabacum) Meagher et al., 2000 At seven days, tobacco plants had decreased Hg(II) in solution from 5 to 1.25 M by reducing it to less toxic metallic mercury, which was volatilized. Nickel Soil Phytoextraction 14 to 3,333 mg/kg Berkheya coddii Robinson et al., 1997 It was estimated that plants could achieve a Ni content of 5000 g/g and remove 110 kg Ni per ha. Plants did not grow in soils with 10,000 mg/kg Ni. Phytostabilization Unspecified concentrations in mine tailings. Native plants (herbs, shrubs, and trees) including hyperaccumulators and legumes. Plants and soil amendments have been used to reclaim mine tailings in New Caledonia. Brooks et al., 1998 Water Rhizofiltration 1 mg/L in hydroponic solution Twelve wetland plants Qian et al., 1999 Smart weed (Polygonum hydropiperoides L.) was most effective of the plants tested in removing Ni, and could remove 108 g Ni/ha per day.
Page 1 and 2: United States Environmental Protect
Page 3 and 4: et al., 1995; Cunningham et al., 19
Page 5 and 6: phytoimmobilization. Phytostabiliza
Page 7 and 8: concentrations can decrease root pe
Page 9 and 10: successfully treated wastewater con
Page 11 and 12: plant (phytovolatilization). Some m
Page 13 and 14: depths. For example, measurement of
Page 15 and 16: (5) Vegetation can also reduce or p
Page 17 and 18: Phytoremediation has been investiga
Page 19 and 20: Dushenkov, S., D. Vasudev, Y. Kapul
Page 21 and 22: Pradhan, S.P., J.R. Conrad, J.R. Pa
Page 23: 23 Table 1. Phytoremediation of Met
Page 27 and 28: 27 Table 2. Phytoremediation of Met
Page 29 and 30: 29 Table 2. continued CONTAMINANT M
Page 31 and 32: 31 Table 3. Phytoremediation of Org

Ground Water Issue Phytoremediation of Contaminated ... - CLU-IN

Create successful ePaper yourself

Delete template?

Save as template?