14.08.2013 Views

New Entities in Smoking Related Lung Disease

New Entities in Smoking Related Lung Disease

New Entities in Smoking Related Lung Disease

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

<strong>New</strong> <strong>Entities</strong> <strong>in</strong> Smok<strong>in</strong>g-<br />

<strong>Related</strong> <strong>Lung</strong> <strong>Disease</strong><br />

Kirk D. Jones, MD<br />

UCSF Dept. of Pathology<br />

kirk.jones@ucsf.edu<br />

Eos<strong>in</strong>ophilic Pneumonia<br />

• Unusual illness <strong>in</strong> US soldiers<br />

stationed <strong>in</strong> Iraq<br />

– 100 cases (out of 183,000 troops)<br />

– Several possible etiologies suggested:<br />

• uranium munitions<br />

• anthrax vacc<strong>in</strong>ation<br />

• biowarfare agents<br />

• severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)<br />

Overview<br />

• Eos<strong>in</strong>ophilic Pneumonia<br />

– Military cases<br />

– Japanese Review<br />

• Smok<strong>in</strong>g-related Interstitial Fibrosis<br />

– Katzenste<strong>in</strong> Article<br />

• Classification of Adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma<br />

– Pathologic Recommendations<br />

JAMA 2004; 292: 2997-3005<br />

5/28/2011<br />

1


• 18 cases <strong>in</strong> series<br />

• All smokers<br />

– 14 recently started<br />

Iraq Cases<br />

• All but one exposed to dusts<br />

• 6 had BAL<br />

– 8-42% eos<strong>in</strong>ophils<br />

• 12 mechanically ventilated<br />

• 2 died<br />

5/28/2011<br />

2


The Military Experience<br />

• Analysis of 15 different brands of<br />

tobacco available <strong>in</strong> the theater of<br />

operation revealed no unusual<br />

components, tox<strong>in</strong>s, pesticide residues<br />

or significant microbial colonization.<br />

CHEST 2008; 133: 1174-1180<br />

Diagnosis of Eos<strong>in</strong>ophilic<br />

Pneumonia<br />

• Triad of f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>gs with<strong>in</strong> airspaces<br />

– Macrophages (often mult<strong>in</strong>ucleate)<br />

– Fibr<strong>in</strong><br />

– Eos<strong>in</strong>ophils<br />

• Often, the clue will be the macrophages<br />

rather than the eos<strong>in</strong>ophils<br />

• Be aware of steroid adm<strong>in</strong>istration<br />

– Hypereos<strong>in</strong>ophilic, granular fibr<strong>in</strong><br />

5/28/2011<br />

3


Overlap with other diseases<br />

• Smok<strong>in</strong>g related diseases<br />

– Desquamative <strong>in</strong>terstitial pneumonia<br />

• Smoker’s macrophages with<strong>in</strong> airspaces<br />

• Clues on the CT scan<br />

– Pulmonary Langerhans cell histiocytosis<br />

• Bronchiolocentric disease<br />

• Cysts and nodules on CT<br />

• Langerhans cell <strong>in</strong>filtrate<br />

• Fibr<strong>in</strong>ous organiz<strong>in</strong>g pneumonia<br />

• Plugs of fibr<strong>in</strong>, but lacks eos<strong>in</strong>ophils<br />

5/28/2011<br />

4


5/28/2011<br />

5


Conclusions on EP<br />

• Smok<strong>in</strong>g can be added to the list of<br />

causes of eos<strong>in</strong>ophilic pneumonia<br />

– Start<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– Increas<strong>in</strong>g frequency of cigarettes<br />

– Restart<strong>in</strong>g smok<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– Chang<strong>in</strong>g brands<br />

• Infection (e.g. Coccidioides), Drug<br />

reaction, Churg-Strauss, idiopathic<br />

Smok<strong>in</strong>g-related <strong>in</strong>terstitial<br />

fibrosis (SRIF)<br />

• Emphysema the textbook<br />

– “abnormal permanent enlargement of the<br />

airspaces distal to the term<strong>in</strong>al bronchiole,<br />

accompanied by destruction of their walls,<br />

and without obvious fibrosis”<br />

• Emphysema as experienced <strong>in</strong> reality<br />

– Often with associated fibrosis<br />

• Bronchiolocentric (as <strong>in</strong> respiratory bronchiolitis)<br />

• Patchy<br />

• Peripheral<br />

5/28/2011<br />

6


Human Pathology 2010; 41: 316-325<br />

SRIF – Patterns of Fibrosis<br />

• Variable widen<strong>in</strong>g of the alveolar septa<br />

by dense, relatively acellular collagen<br />

– Patchy <strong>in</strong> distribution<br />

– Accentuated subpleurally and around<br />

bronchioles<br />

– Associated respiratory bronchiolitis<br />

– May resemble “burnt out LCH”<br />

• Stellate bronchiolocentric scars<br />

Smok<strong>in</strong>g <strong>Related</strong> Interstitial<br />

Fibrosis (SRIF)<br />

• Exam<strong>in</strong>ed 23 lobectomy specimens<br />

– Excised for primary pulmonary neoplasms<br />

• 10 AD, 6 SQ, 1 ADSQ, 2 SCC, 1 LCNEC, 2 TC, 1 AC<br />

• 3 nonsmokers<br />

– 27 sections per lobe<br />

– 12 cases with significant fibrosis (all smokers)<br />

• 1 case: Usual <strong>in</strong>terstitial pneumonia pattern<br />

• 1 case: Asbestosis<br />

• 1 case: Langerhans cell histiocytosis<br />

• 9 cases: Termed SRIF<br />

5/28/2011<br />

7


Histopathology 2008, 53: 707-714<br />

5/28/2011<br />

8


SRIF - Conclusions<br />

• Smok<strong>in</strong>g can result <strong>in</strong> a surpris<strong>in</strong>g<br />

variety of fibrotic patterns.<br />

• Important to correlate fibrotic cases<br />

with cl<strong>in</strong>ical and radiologic data.<br />

– Particularly if fibroblast foci and<br />

honeycomb<strong>in</strong>g are present.<br />

• A new name for a common f<strong>in</strong>d<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– “Irregular emphysema”<br />

– “Airspace enlargement with fibrosis”<br />

Airspace Enlargement with Fibrosis<br />

• AEF def<strong>in</strong>ed as:<br />

– Fibrous (frequently hyal<strong>in</strong>ized) <strong>in</strong>terstitium with<br />

structural remodel<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– Emphysematous changes<br />

– Frequent bronchiolocentric location<br />

– Absence of fibroblast foci<br />

• AEF is associated with smok<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– May be observed <strong>in</strong> some occupational<br />

exposures/pneumoconioses<br />

• Can be associated with a UIP pattern<br />

Classification of <strong>Lung</strong><br />

Adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma<br />

• International multidiscipl<strong>in</strong>ary effort by:<br />

– IASLC: International Association for the<br />

Study of <strong>Lung</strong> Cancer<br />

– ATS: American Thoracic Society<br />

– ERS: European Respiratory Society<br />

• Representatives from thoracic<br />

oncology, pulmonology, radiology,<br />

molecular biology, thoracic surgery,<br />

and pathology<br />

5/28/2011<br />

9


Journal of Thoracic Oncology 2011; 6: 244-285<br />

Pathology Recommendation 1<br />

• “We recommend discont<strong>in</strong>u<strong>in</strong>g the use<br />

of the term “BAC”<br />

– Five situations where it is used:<br />

• Current WHO def<strong>in</strong>ition (lacks <strong>in</strong>vasion)<br />

• Lesions with small regions of <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />

• Lesions with predom<strong>in</strong>ant surface growth but<br />

central <strong>in</strong>vasive component<br />

• Lesions with prom<strong>in</strong>ent <strong>in</strong>vasive component<br />

and peripheral alveolar surface growth<br />

• In muc<strong>in</strong>ous tumors (with <strong>in</strong>vasion)<br />

Classification: Summary<br />

• Elim<strong>in</strong>ate bronchioloalveolar carc<strong>in</strong>oma<br />

• Def<strong>in</strong>e adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma <strong>in</strong> situ<br />

• Def<strong>in</strong>e m<strong>in</strong>imally <strong>in</strong>vasive adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma<br />

• Resurrect the term “lepidic”<br />

• Promote comprehensive histologic subtyp<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Emphasize micropapillary carc<strong>in</strong>oma<br />

• Detach muc<strong>in</strong>ous adenocarc<strong>in</strong>omas<br />

• Discourage term NSCLC – subclassify if possible<br />

Journal of Thoracic Oncology. 6(2):244-285, February 2011.<br />

5/28/2011<br />

10


Pathology Recommendations 2/3<br />

• Small (≤3 cm) solitary<br />

adenocarc<strong>in</strong>omas with pure lepidic<br />

growth termed adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma <strong>in</strong> situ.<br />

• Small (≤3 cm) solitary<br />

adenocarc<strong>in</strong>omas with predom<strong>in</strong>ant<br />

lepidic growth and foci of <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />

measur<strong>in</strong>g ≤ 0.5 cm termed m<strong>in</strong>imally<br />

<strong>in</strong>vasive adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma.<br />

Lepidic Growth<br />

• Ma<strong>in</strong>ta<strong>in</strong>s alveolar architecture<br />

– No destruction or effacement<br />

• No central or broad scar<br />

• Often has thickened alveolar septa<br />

• Cuboidal epithelium<br />

• Little to no stratification or tuft<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• No papillary structures<br />

5/28/2011<br />

11


From Whence “Lepidic”<br />

• J. George Adami, Pr<strong>in</strong>ciples<br />

of Pathology, 1908<br />

– Novel classification of<br />

cancers:<br />

• Lepidic: Tumors derived from<br />

“l<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g membranes”<br />

– From “λεπιδοσ” mean<strong>in</strong>g scale.<br />

• Hylic: Tumors derived from<br />

“pulps”<br />

– From “ύλη” mean<strong>in</strong>g crude<br />

undifferentiated material<br />

5/28/2011<br />

12


From Whence “Lepidic”<br />

• 1962: H. Spencer, Pathology of the <strong>Lung</strong><br />

– “Malignant pulmonary adenomatosis show<strong>in</strong>g the<br />

lepidic nature of the tumour cells.”<br />

– “In the more rapidly grow<strong>in</strong>g and anaplastic<br />

tumours the cells may grow <strong>in</strong> a hylic fashion.”<br />

– “Other cells grow out <strong>in</strong>to the surround<strong>in</strong>g alveoli<br />

either fill<strong>in</strong>g them with a solid mass of malignant<br />

cells (a hilic growth) or l<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g their walls (a lepidic<br />

growth)”.<br />

While it is tempt<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

use me as a visual<br />

metaphor, I have noth<strong>in</strong>g<br />

to do with the term<br />

lepidic other than our<br />

common Lat<strong>in</strong> root.<br />

Lepidic – the temptation<br />

• Lepidic = scale-like<br />

• Lepidoptera = scale w<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• BAC: Aerogenous spread, rests on<br />

alveolar septa<br />

• Butterfly: Aerogenous travel, rests on<br />

grasses and flowers<br />

Judg<strong>in</strong>g Invasion<br />

• Several features may be used to diagnose<br />

regions of <strong>in</strong>vasion; however, this can<br />

occasionally be difficult<br />

• Broad regions of scarr<strong>in</strong>g/central scar<br />

– Not simply alveolar wall thicken<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Abnormal gland architecture<br />

– Odd alveolar shapes, lack of airspace<br />

macrophages<br />

• Blood or lymphatic vascular, pleural <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />

• Architectural patterns which denote <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />

5/28/2011<br />

13


Patterns which denote <strong>in</strong>vasion<br />

• Solid with muc<strong>in</strong><br />

– Includ<strong>in</strong>g clear cell, signet r<strong>in</strong>g<br />

• Papillary<br />

• Ac<strong>in</strong>ar<br />

• Micropapillary (Pathology recommendation 7)<br />

– Prognostic data<br />

5/28/2011<br />

14


Pathology Recommendation 4/5<br />

• Comprehensive histologic subtyp<strong>in</strong>g used<br />

to assess patterns semiquantitatively <strong>in</strong><br />

5% <strong>in</strong>crements, choos<strong>in</strong>g a s<strong>in</strong>gle<br />

predom<strong>in</strong>ant pattern.<br />

• In multiple lung adenocarc<strong>in</strong>omas,<br />

comprehensive histologic subtyp<strong>in</strong>g may<br />

aid <strong>in</strong> determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g whether tumors are<br />

metastases or separate primaries.<br />

Lesions larger than 3cm?<br />

• The data <strong>in</strong> the IASLC analysis were<br />

for tumors less than 2 or 3 cm.<br />

• If greater than 3 cm<br />

– “Lepidic predom<strong>in</strong>ant adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma,<br />

suspect AIS or MIA.”<br />

– “Lepidic predom<strong>in</strong>ant adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma.”<br />

Am J Surg Pathol. 2009 Dec;33(12):1752-64.<br />

5/28/2011<br />

15


Pathology Recommendation 6<br />

• Tumors with a predom<strong>in</strong>ant surface<br />

alveolar growth pattern and more than<br />

5 mm <strong>in</strong>vasion (but still m<strong>in</strong>or<br />

component) should be termed:<br />

– Lepidic predom<strong>in</strong>ant adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma<br />

– “Mixed subtype” should be discont<strong>in</strong>ued<br />

Pathology Recommendation 8<br />

• Former muc<strong>in</strong>ous BAC will be termed<br />

muc<strong>in</strong>ous AIS, muc<strong>in</strong>ous MIA, or<br />

<strong>in</strong>vasive muc<strong>in</strong>ous adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma<br />

5/28/2011<br />

16


Pathology Recommendation 9/10<br />

• NSCLC be classified <strong>in</strong>to more specific<br />

histologic type whenever possible<br />

• NSCLC-NOS should be used as little as<br />

possible<br />

Why Does This Matter?<br />

• AIS and MIA, as def<strong>in</strong>ed, have a much<br />

better prognosis when compared to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vasive tumors of the same size.<br />

• Some histologic subtypes have<br />

prognostic significance.<br />

– Lepidic > Ac<strong>in</strong>ar / Papillary > Solid / Micropapillary<br />

5/28/2011<br />

17


How to <strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>in</strong>to practice<br />

• Tumor size for stag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– If not lepidic pattern – use gross<br />

measurement or measure off slide.<br />

– If lepidic pattern:<br />

– I currently report both <strong>in</strong>vasive and total<br />

diameter. I stage accord<strong>in</strong>g to <strong>in</strong>vasive<br />

regions when tumor less than 3 cm (1a vs.<br />

1b)<br />

How to <strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>in</strong>to practice<br />

• Histologic typ<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– I am a partial fan of comprensive<br />

histologic typ<strong>in</strong>g. I f<strong>in</strong>d it useful for<br />

determ<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g met vs. multiple primary, but I<br />

don’t like us<strong>in</strong>g 5% <strong>in</strong>cremental diagnosis.<br />

– Diagnose adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma, then list the<br />

subtypes <strong>in</strong> the comment.<br />

How to <strong>in</strong>corporate <strong>in</strong>to practice<br />

• Tumor size for stag<strong>in</strong>g<br />

– If not lepidic pattern – use gross<br />

measurement or measure off slide.<br />

– If lepidic pattern:<br />

• Less than 3 cm: I currently report both <strong>in</strong>vasive<br />

and total diameter. I stage accord<strong>in</strong>g to<br />

<strong>in</strong>vasive regions (1a vs. 1b).<br />

• Greater than 3 cm report as usual (for now).<br />

<strong>New</strong>: Lepidic predom<strong>in</strong>ant adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma.<br />

Old: Adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma, mixed bronchioloalveolar, papillary and ac<strong>in</strong>ar type.<br />

Possible: Adenocarc<strong>in</strong>oma, see comment.<br />

5/28/2011<br />

18


5/28/2011<br />

19

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!