Prosecuting Alcohol-Facilitated Sexual Assault - National District ...
Prosecuting Alcohol-Facilitated Sexual Assault - National District ...
Prosecuting Alcohol-Facilitated Sexual Assault - National District ...
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
P R OSECUTING A LCOHOL-FACILITATED S EXUAL A SSAULT<br />
speech slurred? The more sober he was, the easier it is to show he was<br />
a predator, especially if the victim was extremely intoxicated.<br />
■ Was there any planning or manipulation on the part of the defendant?<br />
Were there any attempts to deceive the victim? Did the defendant do<br />
anything to control the situation and overcome the victim’s will? Did<br />
he isolate her? Did he lie to her?<br />
■ Is there any evidence of grooming? Did the defendant do anything during<br />
the time prior to the rape to gain the victim’s trust? Did he do<br />
anything to make it easier to rape her? Is there any evidence that he<br />
set her up? For example, did he talk about making a “special punch” to<br />
get his “target” drunk? Did he buy her drinks and encourage her to<br />
drink them in an attempt to get her drunk?<br />
■ Did the defendant prey upon the victim’s vulnerabilities? Did he do<br />
anything to wear down the victim’s resistance? Is there any evidence<br />
that the defendant selected the victim because he knew that she would<br />
be an easy target?<br />
■ Has the defendant done it before? Have anyone else ever accused him of<br />
rape or other misconduct? Has anyone ever seen women leaving his<br />
room/apartment/home crying or distraught? 45<br />
■ Did the defendant know the victim? If so, did he use his knowledge or<br />
familiarity with the victim to gain access to her or to isolate her? Did<br />
he use his knowledge to attempt to silence her?<br />
Consideration of the factors listed above should help prosecutors analyze<br />
whether the defendant is a predator and distinguish between drunken sex<br />
and rape.<br />
Step 2: Analyzing Credibility and Corroboration<br />
The second step in handling AFSA cases is determining whether the<br />
allegations can be proven by analyzing the victim’s credibility as well as<br />
any corroboration that exists. Jurors’ negative perceptions of a victim’s<br />
credibility can be a significant barrier to successful prosecution. In rape<br />
cases, credibility of the victim and provability of the case are inherently<br />
intertwined, in large part because rape is a crime of secrecy.There are<br />
almost never eyewitnesses to a rape. Moreover, rape cases rarely have<br />
physical evidence that conclusively proves that a rape occurred.<br />
12 N ATIONAL D ISTRICT ATTORNEYS A SSOCIATION