17.08.2013 Views

Generalizing the Bardos-LeRoux-Nédélec boundary condition for ...

Generalizing the Bardos-LeRoux-Nédélec boundary condition for ...

Generalizing the Bardos-LeRoux-Nédélec boundary condition for ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

The problem BLN <strong>condition</strong> & Alternatives Effective BC graph Definition Uniqueness Definition Bis Existence & Convergence of Approximations<br />

Equivalent definition of solution<br />

Proposition (Entropy solution)<br />

Let u ∈ L ∞ . The assertions (i),(ii) are equivalent :<br />

(i) (“def. with traces”) u is an entropy solution in <strong>the</strong> above sense<br />

(ii) (“def. a-la Carrillo” + technicalities ) The function u verifies:<br />

∀k ∈ R ∀ξ ∈ D([0, T ) × Ω) +<br />

T<br />

<br />

± ± <br />

−(u − k) ξt − q (u, k) · ∇ξ − (u0 − k)<br />

0 Ω<br />

Ω<br />

± ξ(0, ·)<br />

<br />

≤ Ck∧ β(t,x)(k) − ϕν(x)(k) ∓ ξ(t, x).<br />

Σ<br />

Here, Ck is a constant that depends on u∞ and on k .<br />

And if <strong>the</strong> sets Σ ± (k) := {(t, x) ∈ Σ | k ∈ K±(t, x)} are “regular enough”<br />

<strong>the</strong>n (i),(ii) are also equivalent to<br />

(ii’) (“def. a-la Carrillo”) The function u verifies<br />

T<br />

0<br />

∀k ∈ R ∀ξ ∈ D([0, T ) × Ω) + such that ξ| Σ\Σ ± (k) = 0<br />

<br />

<br />

Ω<br />

−(u − k) ± ξt − q ± (u, k) · ∇ξ −<br />

(u0 − k)<br />

Ω<br />

± ξ(0, ·) ≤ 0.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!