Agenda Template - Orange County Transportation Authority
Agenda Template - Orange County Transportation Authority
Agenda Template - Orange County Transportation Authority
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Board Meeting<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Headquarters<br />
First Floor - Room 154, 600 South Main Street<br />
<strong>Orange</strong>, California<br />
Monday, April 25, 2011, at 9:00 a.m.<br />
Teleconference Notice<br />
Director Winterbottom will participate in this meeting and will vote via<br />
teleconferencing as a Member of the OCTA Board of Directors, pursuant to California<br />
Government Code Section 54953.<br />
Teleconferencing Site<br />
VA Long Beach Healthcare System<br />
5901 E. 7 th St., Bldg. 250, Rm V203, Long Beach, California 90822<br />
Any person with a disability who requires a modification or accommodation in order to<br />
participate in this meeting should contact the OCTA Clerk of the Board, telephone<br />
(714) 560-5676, no less than two (2) business days prior to this meeting to enable<br />
OCTA to make reasonable arrangements to assure accessibility to this meeting.<br />
<strong>Agenda</strong> Descriptions<br />
The agenda descriptions are intended to give members of the public a general<br />
summary of items of business to be transacted or discussed. The posting of the<br />
recommended actions does not indicate what action will be taken. The Board of<br />
Directors may take any action which it deems to be appropriate on the agenda item<br />
and is not limited in any way by the notice of the recommended action.<br />
Public Comments on <strong>Agenda</strong> Items<br />
Members of the public may address the Board of Directors regarding any item.<br />
Please complete a speaker’s card and submit it to the Clerk of the Board or notify<br />
the Clerk of the Board the item number on which you wish to speak. Speakers will<br />
be recognized by the Chairman at the time the agenda item is to be considered.<br />
A speaker’s comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes.<br />
Public Availability of <strong>Agenda</strong> Materials<br />
All documents relative to the items referenced in this agenda are available for public<br />
inspection at www.octa.net or through the Clerk of the Board’s office at the<br />
OCTA Headquarters, 600 South Main Street, <strong>Orange</strong>, California.<br />
Call to Order<br />
Pledge of Allegiance<br />
Director Campbell<br />
Invocation<br />
Director Hansen<br />
Page 1
Special Calendar<br />
1. Presentation of Resolutions of Appreciation for Employees of the Month<br />
for April 2011<br />
Present <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Resolutions of Appreciation<br />
Nos. 2011-032, 2011-033, 2011-034 to Kathy Guzman, Coach Operator;<br />
Quy Nguyen, Maintenance; and Adriann Cardoso, Administration, as<br />
Employees of the Month for April 2011.<br />
2. Special Recognition to Lt. Jim Rudy for Outstanding Service to OCTA<br />
Presentation of special resolution to Lt. Jim Rudy for outstanding service to<br />
OCTA, its Board Members, employees, and customers.<br />
3. Presentation of Resolution of Appreciation to <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sheriff's<br />
Department Employee of the Quarter<br />
Present <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Resolution of Appreciation<br />
No. 2011-014 to <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sheriff's Deputy Guy Coffee.<br />
Consent Calendar (Items 4 through 23)<br />
All matters on the Consent Calendar are to be approved in one motion unless a<br />
Board Member or a member of the public requests separate action on a specific item.<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong><br />
4. Approval of Minutes<br />
Of the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and affiliated agencies' regular<br />
meeting of April 11, 2011.<br />
5. Approval of Board Member Travel<br />
Approval is requested for Chairman Bates, Vice Chair Glaab, and<br />
Directors Amante, Buffa, and Campbell to travel to New York, NY,<br />
June 21 - 25, 2011, to attend the annual rating agency trip.<br />
Page 2
6. Selection of Consultant to Conduct Independent Annual Financial<br />
Auditing Services<br />
Janet Sutter<br />
Overview<br />
The <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> requires the services of an<br />
independent public accounting firm to perform annual financial and<br />
compliance audits and agreed-upon procedures reviews of the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and related agencies for the fiscal years ending<br />
June 30, 2011, 2012, and 2013. Offers were received in accordance with the<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>’s procurement procedures for<br />
professional and technical services.<br />
Recommendations<br />
A. Recommend the selection of a McGladrey & Pullen, LLP to conduct<br />
independent annual financial auditing services as set forth in<br />
Request for Proposals 1-2392.<br />
B. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate and execute an<br />
agreement with McGladrey & Pullen, LLP to perform independent<br />
annual financial auditing services for the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
<strong>Authority</strong> and related agencies.<br />
C. Amend the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Fiscal<br />
Year 2010-11 Budget to accommodate the increase from the existing<br />
budget amount of $447,100 to the amount required for the new<br />
contract.<br />
D. Affirm the Finance and Administration Committee’s adoption of the<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Audit Responsibilities of the<br />
Finance and Administration Committee on January 19, 2011, which<br />
included an additional responsibility for the Finance and Administration<br />
Committee to ensure that the lead and concurring partners on the<br />
financial statement audits of the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
<strong>Authority</strong> be rotated at least every five years.<br />
Page 3
7. State Legislative Status Report<br />
Kristin Essner/Lance M. Larson<br />
Overview<br />
The current definition of farebox revenues is provided and a strategy for<br />
performing a comprehensive review and possible update is outlined.<br />
In addition, an overview of existing state highway construction and right-ofway<br />
authority is given for discussion.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Request that the California Transit Association and American Public<br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> Association conduct a comprehensive review of farebox<br />
revenue definitions and develop recommendations for an update to be<br />
considered by the Legislature or Congress for future action.<br />
8. State Legislation Recommended for Positions and Discussion<br />
Kristin Essner/Lance M. Larson<br />
Overview<br />
Two bills related to Neighborhood Electric Vehicles are discussed and a<br />
recommendation is made to expand the authority to the <strong>County</strong> of <strong>Orange</strong> and<br />
cities within the county. Another bill is discussed related to transit security<br />
funding in Proposition 1B (2006). Lastly, a bill related to the study of unmet<br />
transit needs in California is discussed.<br />
Recommendations<br />
A. Work with the authors of AB 61 (Jeffries, R-Lake Elsinore) and SB 290<br />
(Correa, D-Santa Ana) to see if this authority can be further extended to<br />
the <strong>County</strong> of <strong>Orange</strong> and cities within the county.<br />
B. Work with the author of AB 427 (Pérez, D-Los Angeles) on proposals to<br />
update the structure of the transit security grant program from<br />
Proposition 1B (2006).<br />
Page 4
9. Federal Legislative Status Report<br />
Richard J. Bacigalupo/Lance M. Larson<br />
Overview<br />
This Federal Legislative Status Report provides information regarding the<br />
initiation of federal fiscal year 2012 Federal Budget process and hearings in<br />
the United States House of Representatives regarding the reauthorization of<br />
surface transportation legislation.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Receive and file as an information item.<br />
10. Grant Award for <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Fair Flyer Service<br />
Ric Teano/Lance M. Larson<br />
Overview<br />
On March 17, 2011, the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review<br />
Committee of the South Coast Air Quality Management District awarded<br />
$211,360 in competitive grant funds to support the direct operating costs of<br />
the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Fair Flyer service. The award provides an opportunity for<br />
the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> to restore special express bus<br />
service to the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Fair for the upcoming fair season. Authorization<br />
is requested to accept the award, execute grant-related agreements, and<br />
implement the service.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute grant-related agreements<br />
with the Mobile Source Air Pollution Reduction Review Committee and direct<br />
staff to implement the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Fair Flyer service.<br />
Page 5
11. Memorandum of Understanding with the Foothill/Eastern <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
Corridor Agency and Riverside <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> Commission for<br />
the Foothill <strong>Transportation</strong> Corridor (State Route 241)/91 Express Lanes<br />
Direct Connector Project<br />
Pradeep Gunaratne/Jim Beil<br />
Overview<br />
The Foothill/Eastern <strong>Transportation</strong> Corridor Agency, in conjunction with the<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and Riverside <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
Commission, has developed a memorandum of understanding to study the<br />
development of a direct connector between the Foothill <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
Corridor (State Route 241) and the 91 Express Lanes.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute Memorandum of<br />
Understanding No. C-1-2558 between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
<strong>Authority</strong>, the Foothill/Eastern <strong>Transportation</strong> Corridor Agency, and the<br />
Riverside <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> Commission to develop a direct connector<br />
between the Foothill <strong>Transportation</strong> Corridor (State Route 241) and the<br />
91 Express Lanes.<br />
12. California <strong>Transportation</strong> Commission Corridor Mobility Improvement<br />
Account Project Cost Savings 2011 Call for Projects - <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Submittal<br />
Ben Ku/Kia Mortazavi<br />
Overview<br />
On March 23, 2011, the California <strong>Transportation</strong> Commission issued a<br />
Corridor Mobility Improvement Account Project Cost Savings 2011 Call for<br />
Projects. The Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5)/Ortega Highway<br />
(State Route 74) Interchange Reconstruction Project is recommended for<br />
submission for this state funding program.<br />
Page 6
12. (Continued)<br />
Recommendations<br />
A. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer, or his designee, to submit the<br />
Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5)/Ortega Highway (State Route 74)<br />
Interchange Reconstruction Project nomination to the California<br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> Commission for the Corridor Mobility Improvement<br />
Account Project Cost Savings 2011 Call for Projects.<br />
B. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer, or his designee, to negotiate and<br />
execute an agreement between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
<strong>Authority</strong> and the <strong>County</strong> of <strong>Orange</strong>, to reflect the Santa Ana Freeway<br />
(Interstate 5)/Ortega Highway (State Route 74) Interchange<br />
Reconstruction Project funding plan changes, upon approval of this<br />
project, into the Corridor Mobility Improvement Account Project Cost<br />
Savings 2011 Call for Projects.<br />
C. Authorize staff to process all necessary amendments to the<br />
Regional Federal <strong>Transportation</strong> Improvement Program to facilitate the<br />
above actions.<br />
13. First Quarter 2011 Debt and Investment Report<br />
Rodney Johnson/Kenneth Phipps<br />
Overview<br />
The California Government Code authorizes the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Treasurer to submit a quarterly investment report<br />
detailing the investment activity for the period. This investment report covers<br />
the first quarter of 2011, January through March, and includes a discussion on<br />
the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>’s debt portfolio.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Receive and file the Quarterly Investment Report prepared by the Treasurer<br />
as an information item.<br />
Page 7
14. <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sustainable Communities Strategy Contract Amendment<br />
Overview<br />
In August 2010, the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> entered into an<br />
agreement with LSA Associates, Inc., for purposes of developing an<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sustainable Communities Strategy per SB 375<br />
(Statutes 2008). At that time, it was unclear if the contract amount of<br />
$250,000 over an 18-month period would be sufficient to adequately complete<br />
the work effort as this was a brand new legislative requirement. While the<br />
contract is with the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>, federal funds<br />
previously secured by the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Council of Governments will be<br />
used for this effort. Approval of the additional work request to complete the<br />
strategy, totaling $275,000, was unanimously approved at the<br />
March 24, 2011, <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Council of Governments Board of Directors<br />
meeting.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute Amendment No. 1 to<br />
Agreement No. C-0-1609 between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
<strong>Authority</strong> and LSA Associates, Inc., in an amount not to exceed $275,000, to<br />
complete the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sustainable Communities Strategy, bringing the<br />
total contract value to $525,000.<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit District Consent Calendar Matters<br />
15. Agreement for Emergency Response Training for Frontline Personnel<br />
Bruce H. Gadbois/Beth McCormick<br />
Overview<br />
The <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> maintains an active program of<br />
emergency management training and exercises. As part of that ongoing effort,<br />
federal grant funds were obtained to develop a training and exercise program<br />
to enhance preparedness, response, and recovery capabilities in the event of<br />
an incident affecting one of the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong><br />
facilities or systems. To address this need, staff initiated a competitive<br />
procurement for consulting assistance to achieve these goals.<br />
Page 8
15. (Continued)<br />
Recommendation<br />
Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute Agreement No. C-0-1916<br />
between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and<br />
Willdan Homeland Solutions, in the amount of $354,041, to provide<br />
emergency response training to frontline personnel through April 15, 2012.<br />
16. Amendment to Cooperative Agreement with Riverside Transit Agency to<br />
Jointly Fund Intercounty Route 216 and New Cooperative Agreement for<br />
Intercounty Express Bus Route 794<br />
Sharon Long/Beth McCormick<br />
Overview<br />
The <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> has two cooperative agreements<br />
with Riverside Transit Agency for the provision of intercounty bus service<br />
Route 216 and Route 794. Both of the agreements establish the level of<br />
service and a joint funding arrangement. Staff is requesting approval to<br />
exercise the first option term for Route 216, extending the agreement through<br />
June 30, 2012, and adding two additional option terms. Staff is also<br />
requesting approval for a new agreement for Route 794.<br />
Recommendations<br />
A. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute Amendment No. 1 to<br />
Cooperative Agreement No. C-0-1456 between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and Riverside Transit Agency, in an amount<br />
not to exceed $204,800, to jointly fund intercounty Route 216 through<br />
June 30, 2012, bringing the total contract value to $422,246.<br />
B. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute Cooperative<br />
Agreement No. C-1-2436, a revenue agreement between the<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and Riverside Transit Agency,<br />
to receive an amount not to exceed $130,000, to jointly fund<br />
intercounty express bus Route 794.<br />
Page 9
17. Americans with Disabilities Act ACCESS Eligibility Determination<br />
Services<br />
Gracie Davis/Beth McCormick<br />
Overview<br />
The <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> is required to provide an<br />
eligibility determination process for Americans with Disabilities Act<br />
complementary paratransit services. The current contract is scheduled to<br />
expire on<br />
June 30, 2011. A competitive procurement has been conducted and offers<br />
were received in accordance with the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
<strong>Authority</strong>’s procurement procedures for professional and technical services.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute Agreement No. C-0-1937<br />
between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and Comprehensive<br />
Assessments Restorative Evaluations, LLC in an amount not to exceed<br />
$1,671,948, for ACCESS eligibility determination services for a three-year<br />
initial term beginning July 1, 2011.<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Local <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Consent Calendar<br />
Matters<br />
18. <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Local <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Measure M Agreed-Upon<br />
Procedures Reports, Year Ended June 30, 2010<br />
Janet Sutter<br />
Overview<br />
Mayer Hoffman McCann P.C., an independent accounting firm, has completed<br />
its annual agreed-upon procedures for eight <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> cities for the fiscal<br />
year ended June 30, 2010. These procedures were developed by the<br />
Taxpayers Oversight Committee of the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Local <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
<strong>Authority</strong> to assist them in evaluating the selected cities’ level of compliance<br />
with provisions of Measure M Local <strong>Transportation</strong> Ordinance No. 2.<br />
Page 10
18. (Continued)<br />
Recommendations<br />
A. Receive and file the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Local <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong><br />
Measure M Agreed-Upon Procedures Reports, Year Ended<br />
June 30, 2010.<br />
B. Direct staff to monitor implementation of recommendations related to<br />
the cities of Westminster, Tustin, and San Juan Capistrano.<br />
C. Direct Internal Audit to review records identified by the City of Tustin<br />
subsequent to the report date and re-issue a report as needed.<br />
D. Direct staff to develop requirements for local agency retention of<br />
records when Local Fair Share revenues are used for debt service.<br />
19. Approval to Release Invitation for Bids for Construction of the Kraemer<br />
Boulevard Railroad Grade Separation Project<br />
Charles Guess/Jim Beil<br />
Overview<br />
The <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and the cities of Anaheim and<br />
Placentia are working in partnership to develop and construct a railroad grade<br />
separation at Kraemer Boulevard. Over the past few months, <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> staff have finalized the project plans, specifications,<br />
and estimates, and the project is now ready for construction.<br />
Board of Directors’ approval is requested to issue an invitation for bids<br />
for construction of the Kraemer Boulevard Railroad Grade Separation Project.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Approve the release of Invitation for Bids 0-1448 for construction of the<br />
Kraemer Boulevard Railroad Grade Separation Project.<br />
Page 11
20. Consultant Selection to Prepare a Project Report and Environmental<br />
Document for the Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) Improvement Project<br />
Between the Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55) and <strong>Orange</strong> Freeway<br />
(State Route 57)<br />
Kenneth Oh/Jim Beil<br />
Overview<br />
On January 10, 2011, the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> issued a<br />
request for proposals for the solicitation of consultant services for the<br />
development of a project report and environmental document for the<br />
Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) Improvement Project between the<br />
Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55) and <strong>Orange</strong> Freeway (State Route 57).<br />
Board of Directors' approval is requested for the selection of a firm to perform<br />
the work.<br />
Recommendations<br />
A. Approve the selection of AECOM Technical Services, Inc., as the firm<br />
to prepare a project report and environmental document for the<br />
Santa Ana Freeway (Interstate 5) Improvement Project between the<br />
Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55) and <strong>Orange</strong> Freeway<br />
(State Route 57).<br />
B. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to negotiate and execute<br />
Agreement No. C-0-1785 between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
<strong>Authority</strong> and AECOM Technical Services, Inc., to prepare a project<br />
report and environmental document for the Santa Ana Freeway<br />
(Interstate 5) Improvement Project between the Costa Mesa Freeway<br />
(State Route 55) and <strong>Orange</strong> Freeway (State Route 57).<br />
21. Metrolink Ridership and Revenue Quarterly Report<br />
Megan Taylor/Jim Beil<br />
Overview<br />
The Southern California Regional Rail <strong>Authority</strong> is a five-member joint powers<br />
authority that operates the 400-mile commuter rail system known as<br />
Metrolink. A report on Metrolink ridership and revenue for service in<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> covering the second quarter of fiscal year 2010-11 is provided<br />
for Board of Directors’ review.<br />
Page 12
21. (Continued)<br />
Recommendation<br />
Receive and file as an information item.<br />
22. Consultant Selection for Preparation of a Project Study Report/<br />
Project Development Support Document for the Riverside Freeway<br />
(State Route 91) from the Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55) to the<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> Freeway (State Route 57)<br />
Alison Army/Kia Mortazavi<br />
Overview<br />
The Measure M2 Capital Action Plan calls for preparation of a preliminary<br />
engineering study for the Riverside Freeway (State Route 91) between the<br />
Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55) and the <strong>Orange</strong> Freeway<br />
(State Route 57). Proposals and statements of qualifications for the<br />
preparation of a project study report/project development support document<br />
were solicited in accordance with the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
<strong>Authority</strong>’s procurement procedures for the retention of consultants to perform<br />
architectural and engineering work.<br />
Recommendations<br />
A. Approve the selection of Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., as the<br />
top-ranked firm to provide the project study report/project development<br />
support document for the Riverside Freeway (State Route 91).<br />
B. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer, or his designee, to negotiate and<br />
execute Agreement No. C-0-1906 between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and Stantec Consulting Services, Inc., to<br />
perform a project study report/project development support document<br />
for the Riverside Freeway (State Route 91) improvements.<br />
Page 13
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Service <strong>Authority</strong> for Freeway Emergencies<br />
Consent Calendar Matters<br />
23. Fiscal Year 2010-11 Freeway Service Patrol Program Fund Transfer<br />
Agreement<br />
P. Sue Zuhlke/Beth McCormick<br />
Overview<br />
The <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Freeway Service Patrol receives funding from the<br />
California Department of <strong>Transportation</strong> under the terms of annual funding<br />
agreements. The fiscal year 2010-11 funding agreement will provide a total of<br />
$3,706,007 for the Freeway Service Patrol program through June 30, 2011.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute Agreement No. C-1-2592<br />
between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and<br />
California Department of <strong>Transportation</strong> for fiscal year 2010-11<br />
Freeway Service Patrol program funding.<br />
Regular Calendar<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Regular Calendar Matters<br />
24. Fiscal Year 2010-11 Comprehensive Business Plan<br />
Sean Murdock/Kenneth Phipps<br />
Overview<br />
The <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong>’s Comprehensive Business Plan<br />
is a financially constrained strategic business tool utilized to ensure the<br />
financial viability of <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> programs and<br />
services, and is designed to assist the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
<strong>Authority</strong> in implementing its strategic goals and objectives within the<br />
framework of sound business practices. The Proposed Fiscal Year 2010-11<br />
Comprehensive Business Plan demonstrates the financial feasibility of all<br />
programs and services over a 20-year horizon.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Approve the Proposed Fiscal Year 2010-11 Comprehensive Business Plan.<br />
Page 14
25. Transit System Study Update<br />
Gordon Robinson/Kia Mortazavi<br />
Overview<br />
An in-depth analysis of the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> bus system is underway through<br />
the Transit System Study. The goal of the study is to find new, affordable ways<br />
to provide cost-effective bus services to meet diverse transportation needs by<br />
making the best use of limited financial resources. Sustaining existing and<br />
new bus services in the short-, intermediate-, and long-term is a key goal of<br />
the study. Guiding principles have emerged from the public outreach and<br />
technical efforts and are presented for review and approval. These principles<br />
will be used to guide the development of draft service strategies that will be<br />
presented in June 2011.<br />
Recommendations<br />
A. Approve the Transit System Study’s guiding principles to support the<br />
development of service strategies.<br />
B. Direct staff to return in June 2011 with draft short-, intermediate-, and<br />
long-term service strategies tailored to the four market areas presented<br />
in this report.<br />
26. Approval to Release the Draft <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sustainable<br />
Communities Strategy<br />
David Simpson<br />
Overview<br />
In December 2009, the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> entered into a<br />
In December 2009, the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> entered into a<br />
cooperative agreement with the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Council of Governments to<br />
prepare and adopt a subregional Sustainable Communities Strategy per SB<br />
375 (Chapter 728, Statutes of 2008). Since that time, jurisdictions and<br />
stakeholders throughout <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> have been working to develop an<br />
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sustainable Communities Strategy. Following extensive local<br />
jurisdiction input, a draft strategy is complete and ready for consideration.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Approve the release of the Draft <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Sustainable Communities<br />
Strategy for purposes of soliciting additional public comment through<br />
June 10, 2011.<br />
Page 15
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Transit District Regular Calendar Matters<br />
27. Amendment to Cooperative Agreements with Adult Day Care Agencies<br />
Jessica Deakyne/Beth McCormick<br />
Overview<br />
Between April 2007 and April 2008, the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong><br />
<strong>Authority</strong> Board of Directors approved cooperative agreements with several<br />
agencies to provide senior transportation to adult day care programs.<br />
Contra ct amendments are required to increase the maximum obligation<br />
and extend these agreements through June 30, 2012.<br />
Recommendations<br />
A. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute Amendment No. 2 to<br />
Cooperative Agreement No. C-8-0517 between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and Acacia Adult Day Services to exercise the<br />
second option term, in an amount not to exceed $641,060, to share in<br />
the cost of providing transportation services through June 30, 2012,<br />
bringing the total contract value to $2,690,660.<br />
B. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute Amendment No. 2 to<br />
Cooperative Agreement No. C-8-0688 between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and Alzheimer’s Family Services Center to<br />
exercise the second option term, in an amount not to exceed $167,760,<br />
to share in the cost of providing transportation services, through<br />
June 30, 2012, bringing the total contract value to $590,928.<br />
C. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute Amendment No. 4 to<br />
Cooperative Agreement No. C-7-0693 between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> ARC to exercise the third<br />
option term, in an amount not to exceed $1,039,200, to share in the<br />
cost of providing transportation services, through June 30, 2012,<br />
bringing the total contract value to $2,848,085.<br />
D. Authorize the Chief Executive Officer to execute Amendment No. 3 to<br />
Cooperative Agreement No. C-7-0689 between the <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong><br />
<strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> and South <strong>County</strong> Senior Services to exercise<br />
the third option term, in an amount not to exceed $324,700, to share in<br />
the cost of providing transportation services through June 30, 2012,<br />
bringing the total contract value to $1,384,244.<br />
Page 16
<strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> Local <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong> Regular Calendar<br />
Matters<br />
28. Report on Phase II Feasibility Study - Traffic and Revenue Analysis for<br />
the San Diego Freeway (Interstate 405) Improvement Project Between<br />
Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55) and San Gabriel River Freeway<br />
(Interstate 605)<br />
Rose Casey/Jim Beil<br />
Overview<br />
Project development and environmental clearance work is underway on the<br />
San Diego Freeway (Interstate 405) Improvement Project between the<br />
Costa Mesa Freeway (State Route 55) and the San Gabriel River Freeway<br />
(Interstate 605). Three alternatives are being considered, including the use of<br />
tolled express lanes. A Phase II feasibility study for the San Diego Freeway<br />
(Interstate 405) Improvement Project has been completed which provides an<br />
updated traffic and revenue analysis for the Express Lanes Alternative.<br />
While additional Measure M2 revenue has been identified for the projects<br />
based in part on bid savings and an uptick in sales tax receipts, the findings of<br />
the Phase II feasibility study indicate that projected revenues for the<br />
Express Lanes Alternative have been conservatively reduced since the<br />
Phase I feasibility study. Further study is recommended to assess the<br />
project’s financial viability, funding alternatives, and methods available to<br />
leverage additional funding.<br />
Recommendation<br />
Direct staff to evaluate alternative funding and delivery methods to further<br />
assess the financial feasibility of the San Diego Freeway (Interstate 405)<br />
Improvement Project Express Lanes Alternative.<br />
Discussion Items<br />
29. Public Comments<br />
At this time, members of the public may address the Board of Directors<br />
regarding any items within the subject matter jurisdiction of the Board of<br />
Directors, but no action may be taken on off-agenda items unless<br />
authorized by law. Comments shall be limited to three (3) minutes per<br />
speaker, unless different time limits are set by the Chairman subject to the<br />
approval of the Board of Directors.<br />
Page 17
30. Chief Executive Officer's Report<br />
31. Directors’ Reports<br />
32. Closed Session<br />
A Closed Session is not scheduled.<br />
33. Adjournment<br />
The next regularly scheduled meeting of this Board will be held at 9:00 a.m.<br />
on Monday, May 9, 2011, at <strong>Orange</strong> <strong>County</strong> <strong>Transportation</strong> <strong>Authority</strong><br />
Headquarters.<br />
Page 18