20.08.2013 Views

insights from the british monarchy - BURA - Brunel University

insights from the british monarchy - BURA - Brunel University

insights from the british monarchy - BURA - Brunel University

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

40<br />

From <strong>the</strong> above it can be inferred that a corporate brand covenant should be<br />

projected not only through corporate communications (Van Riel 1995) but,<br />

moreover, through total corporate communications (Balmer and Gray 1999):<br />

<strong>the</strong> latter is based on <strong>the</strong> notion that <strong>the</strong> activities, behaviours, and<br />

communications associated with a corporate brand has a communications<br />

effect. Based on <strong>the</strong> premise, <strong>the</strong> corporate brand promise should be manifest<br />

unceasingly, and over time, through service quality, product performance,<br />

price, salary, conditions of work, corporate and boardroom behaviour, as well<br />

as through corporate symbolism and architecture.<br />

Consider <strong>the</strong> brand promise associated with well-known corporate brands<br />

such as Disney (wholesome family entertainment), <strong>the</strong> city of Paris (romance),<br />

and BBC (authoritative news and quality radio and TV output). Strap lines<br />

often attempt to capture <strong>the</strong> essence of <strong>the</strong> brand promise. Consider IBM’s<br />

‚business solutions,‛ Philips ‚sense and simplicity,‛ and HSBC’s ‚local<br />

knowledge.‛<br />

The management of corporate brands is typically more difficult than <strong>the</strong><br />

management of product brands. In part this is because a corporate brand<br />

community consists of many stakeholder groups whereas a product brand’s<br />

primary focus is its customers and <strong>the</strong> distribution channels that reach <strong>the</strong>m.<br />

It is <strong>the</strong> task of senior executives to know <strong>the</strong> breadth and depth of <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

corporate brand community and to communicate with <strong>the</strong>m marshalling <strong>the</strong><br />

plethora of corporate communications channels that are available.<br />

One way of conceptualising <strong>the</strong> above is to consider <strong>the</strong> relevance of a<br />

particular corporate brand to (a) its customers and (b) its stakeholder groups.<br />

Of course, <strong>the</strong>re are many forms of brand association and for some<br />

individuals <strong>the</strong>re will be multiple forms of association owing to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

membership of several stakeholder groups. The relevance of corporate brands<br />

can be seen in terms of consumption (e.g. customer loyalty to <strong>the</strong> BMW<br />

brand), employment (a preference to work for Waitrose vis a vis o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

supermarkets), endorsement (industrial endorsement evidenced by loyalty to<br />

Boeing ra<strong>the</strong>r than Airbus), association (<strong>the</strong> prestige accorded to parents<br />

whose daughter has won a place at Yale <strong>University</strong>), acquisition (The Tata<br />

Group’s procurement of celebrated car marques such as Jaguar and Range<br />

Rover), aspiration (<strong>the</strong> purchase of a Brooks Bro<strong>the</strong>rs tie ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong><br />

coveted Brooks Bro<strong>the</strong>rs suit).<br />

_____________________________________________________________________<br />

40

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!