22.10.2012 Views

early-intervention-next-steps

early-intervention-next-steps

early-intervention-next-steps

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

approach to fdelity – staying true to the<br />

programme – meaning that intended efects are<br />

often lost.<br />

9. I make three broad recommendations in<br />

response to the lack of progress. First, I believe<br />

that proven Early Intervention models such as<br />

those described in Chapter 6 should become<br />

more available in the UK. I recommend that<br />

alongside this development greater support<br />

should be given to local innovators to reach higher<br />

standards of evidence, which will help to get<br />

more UK models onto international databases of<br />

proven practice.<br />

10. Second, I recommend the creation of Early<br />

Intervention Places to make a coherent start on<br />

Early Intervention, encouraging 15 localities to<br />

make the most of central and local initiatives.<br />

This would involve the use of central government<br />

initiatives in the 15 sites, greater fexibility for<br />

those in the Places to innovate and evaluate,<br />

and better dissemination support so that local<br />

areas can learn from each other. At the heart<br />

of these recommendations is a commitment<br />

to localism, to support local innovation, and for<br />

central government to be the national advocate,<br />

encouraging and enabling local people rather than<br />

controlling their activities. However, my review<br />

team also heard many calls from local people and<br />

agencies for high-quality central advice to avoid<br />

expensive replication of provision. Localities do<br />

need additional support to help them to make<br />

optimal decisions from the many options now<br />

available to them. There is cl<strong>early</strong> a thirst for such<br />

an alternative or additional ofer. The following<br />

quotations are typical of the comments made by<br />

contributors to the evidence sessions I held for<br />

the review:<br />

‘We need help to explain the importance of<br />

Early Intervention. It isn’t recognised by all the<br />

right people locally, including political leaders.’<br />

‘There are problems with the way Early<br />

Intervention initiatives or programmes are<br />

implemented. All of the good ideas and<br />

enthusiasm at the beginning of a project needs<br />

to be sustained as it is taken to scale. We have a<br />

poor track record in this.’<br />

Chapter 8 The Early Intervention Foundation: bringing programmes and resources to places 101<br />

‘Guidance on which programmes are going to<br />

give us the best result given our local needs<br />

would be welcome. As commissioners we<br />

are bombarded with directives from central<br />

government and requests for business from<br />

private and voluntary organisations. More<br />

support to make better decisions would help us<br />

a lot.’<br />

‘It is difcult to join up services that are funded<br />

through diferent government funding streams,<br />

for example health and education.’<br />

11. To meet these frequent comments from<br />

contributors, my third broad recommendation is<br />

to establish an Early Intervention Foundation to<br />

support local people, communities and agencies,<br />

with initial emphasis on the 15 Early Intervention<br />

Places. It would also tie in to the potential of raising<br />

capital from private and other investors, which<br />

I will examine further in my second report. An<br />

additional responsibility of the Foundation would<br />

be to help local agencies make the best use of<br />

central government initiatives. This chapter sets<br />

out the potential contribution of the Foundation.<br />

It also makes suggestions about its governance.<br />

The objective<br />

12. I recommend that the Foundation be charged<br />

with establishing demonstrable improvements<br />

in the social and emotional bedrock of children<br />

in the 15 Early Intervention Places. In addition,<br />

it should be able to sell its services to the many<br />

other local authorities that are already showing<br />

an interest in the proposal. I believe that pumppriming<br />

funding could be sought potentially<br />

from local government, foundations and private<br />

investors. Central government would provide the<br />

strongest possible political support (always on<br />

an all-party basis) but initial central government<br />

fnancial help, while always welcome, may not be<br />

essential. Indeed, there is a strong argument that it<br />

will be much easier for the Foundation to attract<br />

private and non-governmental investment capital<br />

if it is seen to be independent (rather than an<br />

arm) of central government. I describe below how<br />

this could work. My aspiration aim is for the Early<br />

Intervention Foundation to become self-funding as<br />

quickly as possible. My second report will consider<br />

the appropriate models for achieving this.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!