26.08.2013 Views

Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2008

Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2008

Annual Report for the year ended 31 December 2008

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

The Directors consider that in preparing <strong>the</strong> Financial statements on<br />

pages 44 to 76 that <strong>the</strong>y have:<br />

• selected suitable accounting policies and <strong>the</strong>n apply <strong>the</strong>m<br />

consistently;<br />

• made judgements and estimates that are reasonable and prudent;<br />

• stated that <strong>the</strong> Financial statements comply with iFRss as adopted<br />

by <strong>the</strong> European union; and<br />

• prepared <strong>the</strong> Financial statements on <strong>the</strong> going concern basis, unless<br />

it is inappropriate to presume that <strong>the</strong> Group will continue in business,<br />

in which case <strong>the</strong>re should be supporting assumptions or<br />

qualifications as necessary.<br />

The Directors are responsible <strong>for</strong> keeping proper accounting records that<br />

disclose with reasonable accuracy at any time <strong>the</strong> financial position of<br />

<strong>the</strong> Company and <strong>the</strong> Group and to enable <strong>the</strong>m to ensure that <strong>the</strong><br />

Financial statements and <strong>the</strong> Directors’ Remuneration <strong>Report</strong> comply with<br />

<strong>the</strong> Companies Act 1985 and, as regards <strong>the</strong> Group Financial statements,<br />

Article 4 of <strong>the</strong> iAs Regulation. They are also responsible <strong>for</strong> safeguarding<br />

<strong>the</strong> assets of <strong>the</strong> Company and <strong>the</strong> Group and hence <strong>for</strong> taking reasonable<br />

steps <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> prevention and detection of fraud and o<strong>the</strong>r irregularities.<br />

Each of <strong>the</strong> Directors, whose names and functions are listed in <strong>the</strong><br />

Biography section of this report, are set out on pages 16 to 17 confirm<br />

that to <strong>the</strong> best of <strong>the</strong>ir knowledge:<br />

• <strong>the</strong> Group Financial statements, which have been prepared in<br />

accordance with iFRss as adopted by <strong>the</strong> Eu, give a true and fair view<br />

of <strong>the</strong> assets, liabilities, financial position and loss of <strong>the</strong> Group; and<br />

• <strong>the</strong> Directors’ <strong>Report</strong>, on pages 18 to 23 includes a fair review of<br />

<strong>the</strong> development and per<strong>for</strong>mance of <strong>the</strong> business and <strong>the</strong> position<br />

of <strong>the</strong> Group, toge<strong>the</strong>r with a description of <strong>the</strong> principal risks and<br />

uncertainties that it faces.<br />

The Directors are responsible <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> maintenance and integrity of <strong>the</strong><br />

Group web site, www.evgplc.com. legislation in <strong>the</strong> uK governing <strong>the</strong><br />

preparation and dissemination of Financial statements may differ from<br />

legislation in o<strong>the</strong>r jurisdictions.<br />

directors’ disclosures to <strong>the</strong> auditors<br />

united Kingdom company law (section 234ZA of <strong>the</strong> Companies Act<br />

2005) requires each Director to make an individual statement regarding<br />

<strong>the</strong> disclosure of in<strong>for</strong>mation to <strong>the</strong> auditors. The statement must<br />

confirm that as at <strong>the</strong> date of this report and as far as <strong>the</strong> Director is<br />

aware <strong>the</strong>re is no relevant audit in<strong>for</strong>mation of which <strong>the</strong> Company’s<br />

auditors are unaware; and that <strong>the</strong> Director has taken all <strong>the</strong> steps he<br />

ought to have taken in order to make himself aware of any relevant audit<br />

in<strong>for</strong>mation and to establish that <strong>the</strong> Company’s auditors are aware of<br />

that in<strong>for</strong>mation. A Director is deemed to have taken all <strong>the</strong> steps<br />

necessary that he ought to have taken if he has made such enquiries of<br />

his fellow Directors and of <strong>the</strong> Company’s auditors <strong>for</strong> that purpose, and<br />

taken such o<strong>the</strong>r steps, if any, <strong>for</strong> that purpose as are required by his duty<br />

as a Director of <strong>the</strong> Company to exercise due care, skill and diligence.<br />

All of <strong>the</strong> Directors of <strong>the</strong> Company as at <strong>the</strong> date of this report have<br />

provided such a statement to <strong>the</strong> Company.<br />

The Company’s auditors have been advised that confirmation has been given<br />

and should be interpreted in accordance with <strong>the</strong> provisions of section<br />

234ZA of <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 1985.<br />

auditors<br />

The Group has appointed pricewaterhouseCoopers llp (“pwC”) as<br />

auditors of <strong>the</strong> parent Company and all subsidiaries since 2001.<br />

During <strong>the</strong> <strong>year</strong> <strong>the</strong> Audit Committee reviewed <strong>the</strong> cost effectiveness,<br />

objectivity and independence of <strong>the</strong> auditors in <strong>the</strong> light of assurances<br />

received relating to <strong>the</strong>ir internal quality and control procedures, <strong>the</strong><br />

promptness and accuracy of <strong>the</strong>ir work and o<strong>the</strong>r services obtained from<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir firm. The Audit Committee as a matter of principal will not award<br />

non-audit work to <strong>the</strong> auditors unless it is satisfied, following enquiry,<br />

that <strong>the</strong> provision of such services would not prejudice <strong>the</strong> independence<br />

and objectivity of <strong>the</strong> audit. The auditors disclosed <strong>the</strong> level of fees<br />

received in respect of <strong>the</strong> various services provided by <strong>the</strong>ir firm in<br />

addition to audit during <strong>2008</strong>. They confirmed to <strong>the</strong> Audit Committee<br />

that <strong>the</strong>y did not believe that <strong>the</strong> level of non-audit fees had affected <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

independence. The Audit Committee is responsible <strong>for</strong> implementing a<br />

policy <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> engagement of <strong>the</strong> external auditors to supply non-audit<br />

services. The most appropriate advisers are used <strong>for</strong> non-audit work<br />

taking account of <strong>the</strong> need to maintain independence. The Group does<br />

not maintain a policy of regular fixed-term rotation of auditors.<br />

in addition to <strong>the</strong>ir statutory audit responsibilities, <strong>the</strong> Group will typically<br />

use <strong>the</strong> auditors <strong>for</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r work that <strong>the</strong>y are well placed to undertake in<br />

that role. This includes areas such as: regulatory reviews and o<strong>the</strong>r ancillary<br />

audit work; work in respect of acquisitions and disposals; and tax compliance.<br />

several firms are considered <strong>for</strong> o<strong>the</strong>r work, including <strong>the</strong> auditors in<br />

some instances. in such cases due consideration is given to <strong>the</strong> impact<br />

of <strong>the</strong> assignment on <strong>the</strong> independence of <strong>the</strong> auditors and to <strong>the</strong>ir<br />

qualifications to carry out <strong>the</strong> role.<br />

The Board were satisfied that pwC had sufficient controls in place to<br />

guard against any possible conflicts of interest and to ensure <strong>the</strong><br />

objectivity and independence of <strong>the</strong> audit. pwC were chosen in <strong>the</strong><br />

interests of cost effectiveness, efficiency and timeliness.<br />

Having given consideration to <strong>the</strong> extra work undertaken by <strong>the</strong> auditors,<br />

and after careful discussion with <strong>the</strong> responsible partner in pwC and <strong>the</strong><br />

Executive Directors, <strong>the</strong> Audit Committee is satisfied as to <strong>the</strong><br />

independence of <strong>the</strong> statutory auditors.<br />

Because of this review, <strong>the</strong> Audit Committee recomm<strong>ended</strong> to <strong>the</strong> Board<br />

that <strong>the</strong> auditors be re-elected and a resolution to re-appoint <strong>the</strong>m as<br />

<strong>the</strong> Company’s auditors will be proposed at <strong>the</strong> <strong>for</strong>thcoming <strong>Annual</strong><br />

General Meeting.<br />

pwC have indicated <strong>the</strong>ir willingness to continue in office, and pursuant<br />

to section 384 (1) of <strong>the</strong> Companies Act 1985, an ordinary resolution<br />

re-appointing <strong>the</strong>m as auditors and authorising <strong>the</strong> Directors to determine<br />

<strong>the</strong>ir remuneration will be proposed at <strong>the</strong> 2009 <strong>Annual</strong> General Meeting.<br />

ON BEHAlF OF THE BOARD<br />

Tony lee<br />

secretary<br />

8 April 2009<br />

We have made very good progress<br />

WiTh The inTegraTion and developmenT<br />

of each of our businesses.<br />

23

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!