27.08.2013 Views

Final Report Historical Structures Assessment Report for the Muddy ...

Final Report Historical Structures Assessment Report for the Muddy ...

Final Report Historical Structures Assessment Report for the Muddy ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Historic <strong>Structures</strong> <strong>Assessment</strong> <strong>Report</strong> <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Muddy</strong> Run Pumped Storage Facility Project Relicensing Application<br />

Lancaster and York Counties, Pennsylvania<br />

EXECUTIVE SUMMARY<br />

Exelon Generation Company, LLC (Exelon) has initiated with <strong>the</strong> Federal Energy Regulatory<br />

Commission (FERC) <strong>the</strong> process of relicensing <strong>the</strong> 800-megawatt <strong>Muddy</strong> Run Pumped Storage Project<br />

(Project). The current license <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Muddy</strong> Run Project was issued on September 21, 1964 and expires<br />

on August 31, 2014. FERC issued <strong>the</strong> final study plan determination <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Muddy</strong> Run Project on<br />

February 4, 2010, approving <strong>the</strong> revised study plan with certain modifications. FERC’s final study plan<br />

determination required Exelon to conduct an Archaeological and Historic Cultural Resource Review and<br />

<strong>Assessment</strong>. This report provides a preliminary, planning level survey limited to <strong>the</strong> historic architectural<br />

survey conducted in Martic and Drumore Townships in Lancaster County and Lower Chance<strong>for</strong>d and<br />

Peach Bottom Townships in York County, Pennsylvania.<br />

Between October 2010 and September 2011, TRC conducted an architectural survey within <strong>the</strong> Project<br />

Area of Potential Effect (APE), defined as “…<strong>the</strong> lands enclosed by <strong>the</strong> project’s boundary and lands or<br />

properties outside of <strong>the</strong> project’s boundary where project construction and operation or project-related<br />

recreational development or o<strong>the</strong>r enhancements may cause changes in <strong>the</strong> character or use of historic<br />

properties, if any historic properties exist." The <strong>Muddy</strong> Run Project APE consists of all lands enclosed<br />

by <strong>the</strong> project boundary, as depicted on figures in this report, and in <strong>the</strong> initial filing. The architectural<br />

survey identified resources in <strong>the</strong> APE listed in or eligible <strong>for</strong> listing in <strong>the</strong> National Register of Historic<br />

Places (NRHP), as well as those resources that may be eligible <strong>for</strong> listing in <strong>the</strong> NRHP pending fur<strong>the</strong>r<br />

investigation.<br />

The survey consisted of background research on previously identified architectural resources in <strong>the</strong> APE,<br />

preparation of an historic context developed from <strong>the</strong> Pennsylvania Historic and Museum Commission<br />

(PHMC) <strong>the</strong>matic contexts, and a field survey of any resources 50 years or older within <strong>the</strong> APE. There<br />

are no NRHP-listed architectural resources or architectural resources determined NRHP-eligible by <strong>the</strong><br />

PHMC within <strong>the</strong> APE. The one previously identified resource within <strong>the</strong> APE, <strong>the</strong> Ritchie-Robinson<br />

House (PHMC ID# 118594) located at <strong>the</strong> sou<strong>the</strong>rn end of <strong>the</strong> Project transmission line, is not<br />

recommended eligible <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> NRHP ei<strong>the</strong>r individually or as part of any potential rural historic district.<br />

The farm does not possess a strong representation of a range of typical buildings and landscape features<br />

that illustrate important changes over time in <strong>the</strong> region’s agricultural history. There are no o<strong>the</strong>r<br />

architectural resources 50 years or older in <strong>the</strong> APE.<br />

The <strong>Muddy</strong> Run Pumped Storage Facility, built between 1964 and 1968, was <strong>the</strong> largest pumped storage<br />

facility in <strong>the</strong> world on its completion. The <strong>Muddy</strong> Run facility may be NRHP-eligible under Criteria A<br />

(energy production) and C (engineering), Criteria Consideration G, which recognizes significant<br />

architectural resources less than 50 years old. In accordance with <strong>the</strong> comments of <strong>the</strong> PHMC, TRC<br />

recommends fur<strong>the</strong>r research and field survey to complete <strong>the</strong> PHMC Historic <strong>Structures</strong> Resource (HSR)<br />

<strong>for</strong>m <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> <strong>Muddy</strong> Run facility and to evaluate its eligibility <strong>for</strong> <strong>the</strong> NRHP.<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!