29.08.2013 Views

Borromean Triangles and Prime Knots in an Ancient Temple - Indian ...

Borromean Triangles and Prime Knots in an Ancient Temple - Indian ...

Borromean Triangles and Prime Knots in an Ancient Temple - Indian ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

Figure 1. The <strong>Borrome<strong>an</strong></strong><br />

tri<strong>an</strong>gles <strong>in</strong> the Marundheeswarar<br />

temple.<br />

From a physicist’s<br />

viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, <strong>in</strong> the<br />

pattern of tri<strong>an</strong>gles<br />

<strong>in</strong> Figure 1, there<br />

are no ‘two-body’<br />

correlations while<br />

there is <strong>an</strong><br />

essential ‘three-<br />

body’ correlation.<br />

GENERAL ARTICLE<br />

of the tri<strong>an</strong>gles is removed the other two fall apart as well. From<br />

a physicist’s viewpo<strong>in</strong>t, there are no ‘two-body’ correlations<br />

while there is <strong>an</strong> essential ‘three-body’ correlation.<br />

2. Brunni<strong>an</strong> L<strong>in</strong>ks, <strong>Borrome<strong>an</strong></strong> Circles <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> <strong>Tri<strong>an</strong>gles</strong><br />

Modern mathematics classifies this object as a ‘Brunni<strong>an</strong> l<strong>in</strong>k’.<br />

Formally a l<strong>in</strong>k is a collection of ‘knots’ that do not <strong>in</strong>tersect each<br />

other, but may otherwise be l<strong>in</strong>ked, such as simply two <strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

r<strong>in</strong>gs. A ‘knot’ conforms to our conventional notion of a str<strong>in</strong>g<br />

loop<strong>in</strong>g around itself, but mathematici<strong>an</strong>s prefer that the ends of<br />

the str<strong>in</strong>g be jo<strong>in</strong>ed together. A s<strong>in</strong>gle str<strong>in</strong>g that is not knotted at<br />

all, <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> is therefore called <strong>an</strong> ‘unknot’, is topologically a circle. A<br />

Brunni<strong>an</strong> l<strong>in</strong>k (after H Brunn, Germ<strong>an</strong> mathematici<strong>an</strong> who published<br />

his work on knot theory <strong>in</strong> the late n<strong>in</strong>eteenth century) is a<br />

l<strong>in</strong>k such that if <strong>an</strong>y one of the components is removed, the<br />

rema<strong>in</strong><strong>in</strong>g ones become ‘trivial’ <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> fall apart <strong>in</strong>to unl<strong>in</strong>ked<br />

unknots. It is clear that the three tri<strong>an</strong>gles of the Tripurasundari<br />

temple form precisely such a l<strong>in</strong>k.<br />

However the best known <strong><strong>an</strong>d</strong> simplest example of a Brunni<strong>an</strong> l<strong>in</strong>k<br />

is the <strong>Borrome<strong>an</strong></strong> circles, three circles <strong>in</strong>terl<strong>in</strong>ked <strong>in</strong> such a m<strong>an</strong>ner<br />

that no two of them are l<strong>in</strong>ked but all three are simult<strong>an</strong>eously<br />

42 RESONANCE May 2007

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!