29.08.2013 Views

E. Murad, D-95615 Marktredwitz, Germany

E. Murad, D-95615 Marktredwitz, Germany

E. Murad, D-95615 Marktredwitz, Germany

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Martian Phyllosilicates: Recorders of Aqueous Processes (2008) 7020.pdf<br />

57 Fe MÖSSBAUER SPECTROSCOPY: A TOOL FOR THE REMOTE CHARACTERIZATION OF<br />

PHYLLOSILICATES? E. <strong>Murad</strong>, D-<strong>95615</strong> <strong>Marktredwitz</strong>, <strong>Germany</strong> (emurad@yahoo.com)<br />

Introduction: The earliest Mössbauer study of<br />

phyllosilicates dates back to 1962, when Pollak et al.<br />

[1] published Mössbauer data on several biotites.<br />

Some years later Malden and Meads [2] carried out a<br />

detailed Mössbauer study of a commercial kaolin. By<br />

removing associated mica, these authors arrived at a<br />

set of “true” parameters for the pure clay-sized<br />

phyllosilicate kaolinite. Since then a plethora of papers<br />

on phyllosilicates has been published. The Mössbauer<br />

Minerals Handbook [3] lists 111 papers that make<br />

reference to biotite, 26 papers that refer to muscovite<br />

and 11 references to kaolinite.<br />

All phyllosilicates have the common structural<br />

features of continuous two-dimensional tetrahedral<br />

(Si,Al)O4 sheets which are liked to (Al,Mg)(O,OH)6<br />

octahedral sheets. Different linkages of the sheets to<br />

layers give rise to an assortment of structures. Fig. 1<br />

shows two common layers: a 1:1 layer that is, for<br />

example, observed in kaolinite, and a 2:1 layer that is<br />

developed in micas.<br />

OH,O<br />

Si<br />

Si<br />

Fe<br />

Fig. 1. Common phyllosilicate structures: 1:1 layer<br />

(top) and 2:1 layer (bottom).<br />

Numerous other cations can replace Al and Mg in<br />

the octahedra, and Al often replaces part of the Si in<br />

the tetrahedra. Fe can enter into the octahedra both as<br />

Fe 2+ and Fe 3+ and to a lesser extent into the tetrahedra<br />

as Fe 3+ .<br />

Problems: The structural similarity of the<br />

Al<br />

OH<br />

Al<br />

O<br />

Si<br />

O<br />

O<br />

OH<br />

phyllosilicates makes a distinction of individual<br />

species by Mössbauer spectroscopy difficult (and in<br />

many cases impossible), because the Fe atoms “sense”<br />

predominantly the immediate (tetrahedral or<br />

octahedral) environment. Mössbauer parameters of<br />

phyllosilicates therefore reflect the local Fe symmetry,<br />

and in general allow a distinction of Fe 2+ or Fe 3+ in<br />

more or less moderately distorted octahedral or<br />

tetrahedral environments.<br />

The isomorphous substitution of cations in the<br />

octahedra and tetrahedra leads to variations in the<br />

environments of the resonant (Fe) atoms, causing the<br />

Mössbauer parameters of phyllosilicates to be often<br />

“smeared out”. When studying specific clay-sized<br />

phyllosilicates (“clay minerals” sensu stricto), the<br />

problem of purity may also arise, because these<br />

minerals more often than not occur in close association<br />

with other minerals that can falsify both the bulk<br />

chemistry and physical properties. This problem is<br />

particularly serious when phyllosilicates are associated<br />

with paramagnetic or superparamagnetic Fe 3+ oxides,<br />

because these have Mössbauer parameters that<br />

resemble those of Fe 3+ in many phyllosilicates. The use<br />

of chemical treatments to remove such Fe oxides<br />

involves manipulations that will hardly be feasible on<br />

unmanned missions.<br />

Applications to clay minerals: as indicated above,<br />

57 Fe Mössbauer parameters reflect the local Fe<br />

symmetry. This is straightforward in the case of<br />

octahedrally-coordinated Fe 3+ , because in this case the<br />

quadrupole splitting (Δ) is directly proportional to the<br />

site distortion. The Fe 3+ quadrupole splittings of clay<br />

minerals thus show some subtle variations: nontronite<br />

has a small average Δ of ~ 0.35 mm/s [4], kaolinite has<br />

an intermediate average Δ of ~ 0.51 mm/s [5], whereas<br />

illite has somewhat higher Δ values ranging from<br />

~ 0.59 mm/s for Fe-rich (> 5 wt.-% Fe) illites to ~ 0.73<br />

mm/s for Fe-poor (


Martian Phyllosilicates: Recorders of Aqueous Processes (2008) 7020.pdf<br />

Transmission (%)<br />

100<br />

98<br />

96<br />

100<br />

99<br />

100<br />

98<br />

96<br />

94<br />

92<br />

Nontronite<br />

Kaolinite<br />

Illite<br />

-5 -2.5 0<br />

Velocity (mm/s)<br />

2.5 5<br />

Fig. 2. Room-temperature Mössbauer spectra of<br />

nontronite (top), kaolinite (center) and illite (bottom).<br />

A parameter which is readily revealed by<br />

Mössbauer spectroscopy is the Fe 2+ /Fe 3+ ratio, which<br />

can provide important clues regarding the redox<br />

environment of a sample. The determination of this<br />

ratio by Mössbauer spectroscopy is relatively<br />

straightforward: thus Fig. 2 shows the illite to contain<br />

a minor proportion of Fe 2+ , indicated by a resonant line<br />

at ~ 2.4 mm/s. Such a line is missing in the other two<br />

spectra, indicating Fe in these samples to be<br />

exclusively trivalent.<br />

Applications to natural clays of complex<br />

mineralogy on Earth and Mars: a basic difference<br />

between clay minerals s.s. (clay-sized phyllosilicates)<br />

and Fe oxides is that almost all of the former are<br />

paramagnetic to ~ 10 K, whereas many Fe oxides are<br />

magnetically ordered at 300 K and all are magnetically<br />

ordered at ~ 20 K [7]. Natural clays (and sediments<br />

and soils) are usually more or less complex mixtures of<br />

clay minerals, Fe oxides, and other (Fe-bearing and<br />

Fe-free) minerals. Their room-temperature Mössbauer<br />

spectra thus generally comprise three sets of<br />

components: (1) Fe 3+ doublets from paramagnetic clay<br />

minerals and other silicates, and superparamagnetic Fe<br />

oxides and related minerals (e.g. schwertmannite),<br />

(2) Fe 2+ doublets that, if present, would in most cases<br />

originate from clay minerals, and (3) Fe 3+ sextets from<br />

magnetically ordered Fe oxides. These features have<br />

been used to characterize clays from a variety of<br />

environments using Mössbauer spectroscopy in<br />

combination with other techniques such as X-ray<br />

diffraction, visible, infrared and Raman<br />

spectroscopies, selective chemical extraction<br />

procedures, optical and electron microscopies, and<br />

thermal analysis [8,9,10]. As an example, Fig. 3 shows<br />

how the selective removal of Fe oxides affects the<br />

room-temperature Mössbauer spectrum of a bauxite.<br />

This treatment not only allows a better characterization<br />

of the paramagnetic components (residual minerals,<br />

some or all of which could contribute to the Fe 3+<br />

doublet, have been identified by X ray diffraction as<br />

boehmite, kaolinite, anatase and crandallite), but also<br />

shows the residual hematite to be identical to that<br />

which has been extracted [11].<br />

Transmittance (%)<br />

100<br />

98<br />

96<br />

100<br />

99<br />

98<br />

BX-N<br />

3 x DCB 295 K<br />

-10 -5 0 5 10<br />

Velocity (mm/s)<br />

Fig. 3. Mössbauer spectra of a bauxite before (top)<br />

and after extraction with Na dithionite (bottom).<br />

A constraint on remote work, e.g. on Mars, is that<br />

only minimal sample manipulation will be possible.<br />

Although Mössbauer work has been instrumental in<br />

identifying a variety of Fe oxides on Mars [12,13,14],<br />

a combination of various techniques including<br />

Mössbauer spectroscopy holds promise for a more<br />

comprehensive characterization of clay mineralogy<br />

than Mössbauer spectroscopy alone [15,16].<br />

References: [1] Pollak et al (1962) phys. stat. sol.,<br />

2, 1653, [2] Malden P.J. and Meads R.E. (1967)<br />

Nature, 215, 844, [3] Stevens J.G. et al. (1988)<br />

Mössbauer Mineral Handbook, MEDC, Asheville,<br />

N.C., [4] Cardile C.M. & Johnston J.H. (1985) Clays<br />

Clay Min., 33, 295, [5] <strong>Murad</strong> E. & Wagner U. (1991)<br />

N. Jb. Min. Abh., 162, 281, [6] <strong>Murad</strong> E. & Wagner U.<br />

(1994) Clay Min., 29, 1, [7] <strong>Murad</strong> E. & Cashion J.<br />

(2004) Mössbauer Spectroscopy of Environmental<br />

Materials, Springer, [8] <strong>Murad</strong> E. & Wagner U.<br />

(1989) Hyp. Int., 45, 161, [9] <strong>Murad</strong> E. and Rojík P.<br />

(2005) Clay Min., 40, 427, [10] Bishop J.L. et al. (2007)<br />

Clays Clay Min., 55, 1, [11] <strong>Murad</strong> E. (200x) Min Eng.,<br />

18, 984, [12] Klingelhöfer G. et al. (2005) Hyp. Int., 166,<br />

549, [13], Morris R.V. et al. (2006) JGR, 111, E02S13,<br />

[14], Ming D.W. et al. (2006) JGR, 111, E02S12, [15]<br />

Bishop J.L. et al. (2004) IJA, 3, 275, [16] Lane M.D. et<br />

al. (2004) GRL, 31, L17902.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!