March 1999 Volune 12 No3 - Utah State Bar
March 1999 Volune 12 No3 - Utah State Bar
March 1999 Volune 12 No3 - Utah State Bar
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
í<br />
18<br />
<strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> News<br />
Discipline Corner<br />
ADMONITION<br />
On July 30,1998, an attorney was admonished by the Chai of<br />
the Ethics and Discipline Commttee of the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> for<br />
violation of Rule 1.5 (Safekeeping Propert) ofthe Rules of<br />
Professional Conduct. The attorney was also ordered to attend<br />
the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> Ethics School and to attend courses on<br />
admistering offce trust accounts. The discipline was based<br />
on a stipulation between the attorney and the Offce of Profes-<br />
sional Conduct.<br />
The OPC received several overdraf notices regarding the attor-<br />
ney's trust account. Various circumstances led to the overdrafs<br />
on the trust account, includig the attorney's issuance of checks<br />
the day of deposit when the deposit had not yet been posted; the<br />
attorney's issuance of checks which were the result of settle-<br />
ment checks paid out of the trust account when money from<br />
that account had aleady been earned as attorney's fees and<br />
withdrawn, leavig the account short of money with which to<br />
pay the settlement amount; and a clerical error in which a staf<br />
member wrote a check on the wrong account.<br />
ADMONITION<br />
On August 6, 1998, an attorney was admonished by the Chair of<br />
the Ethcs and Discipline Commttee of the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> for<br />
violation of Rules 1. 5 ( Safekeeping Propert) and 8.4 ( c)<br />
(Misconduct) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The attor-<br />
ney was also ordered to attend the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> Ethics School.<br />
The discipline was based on a stipulation between the attorney<br />
and the Offce of Professional Conduct.<br />
The attorney wrote a check to opposing counsel with a cover<br />
letter stating that funds from the attorney's client had been<br />
deposited into the attorney's trust account. 1\o days later the<br />
attorney went to the bank to deposit the client's funds, and<br />
discovered that the check maied to opposing counsel was<br />
drawn on an account that the attorney had previously closed.<br />
The attorney faxed a latter to opposing counsel statig that the<br />
trust account on which the check had been drafed was closed<br />
and promptly sent a replacement check.<br />
ADMONITION<br />
On November 11, 1998, an attorney was admonished by the<br />
Chair of the Ethics and Disciplie Commttee of the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />
<strong>Bar</strong> for violation of Rules 1. (Dilgence) and 1.4 (Communica-<br />
tion) of the Rules of Professional Conduct.<br />
A client retained the attorney to defend him in a divorce action.<br />
The attorney did no work on the case, and a default judgment<br />
was entered against the client. The client repeatedly attempted<br />
to communicate with the attorney, but these attempts were<br />
usualy not successfu. The attorney faied to have the default<br />
judgment set aside.<br />
On October 8, 1998 a Screening Panel of the Ethcs and Disci-<br />
pline Commttee heard the matter and determined that an<br />
admonition was appropriate disciplie.<br />
ADMONITION<br />
On November 30, 1998, an attorney was admonished by the<br />
Chair of the Ethics and Discipline Commttee of the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />
<strong>Bar</strong>for violation of Rule 1.5 (Fees) of the Rules of Professional<br />
Conduct. The attorney was also ordered to imediately refund<br />
the unearned balance of the retaier fee to the client. The disci-<br />
plie was based on a stipulation between the attorney and the<br />
Offce of Professional Conduct.<br />
A couple retaned the attorney to represent them in various<br />
matters involving child support arrearages. Eventually, this<br />
work came to include representing the couple in a civi action.<br />
The attorney did not communicate to the clients in writig the<br />
basis or rate of the fee he would charge them for performig<br />
legal servces on their behal. The attorney no longer represents<br />
the clients.<br />
ADMONITION<br />
On December 8, 1998, an attorney was admonished by the<br />
Chair of the Ethics and Discipline Committee of the Uta <strong>State</strong><br />
<strong>Bar</strong> for violation of Rule 1.8 (Confct of Interest: Prohibited<br />
Transactions) of the Rules of Professional Conduct.<br />
The attorney was retaied to represent a client in a divorce<br />
proceedig. The client had substantial unsecured credit card<br />
debt and the only asset of any value was the marital home. At<br />
the tie of the proceeding, there was equity in the marital<br />
home. During the course of the proceedig, the attorney rued a<br />
notice of attorney's lien and appearance.