31.08.2013 Views

March 1999 Volune 12 No3 - Utah State Bar

March 1999 Volune 12 No3 - Utah State Bar

March 1999 Volune 12 No3 - Utah State Bar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

í<br />

18<br />

<strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> News<br />

Discipline Corner<br />

ADMONITION<br />

On July 30,1998, an attorney was admonished by the Chai of<br />

the Ethics and Discipline Commttee of the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> for<br />

violation of Rule 1.5 (Safekeeping Propert) ofthe Rules of<br />

Professional Conduct. The attorney was also ordered to attend<br />

the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> Ethics School and to attend courses on<br />

admistering offce trust accounts. The discipline was based<br />

on a stipulation between the attorney and the Offce of Profes-<br />

sional Conduct.<br />

The OPC received several overdraf notices regarding the attor-<br />

ney's trust account. Various circumstances led to the overdrafs<br />

on the trust account, includig the attorney's issuance of checks<br />

the day of deposit when the deposit had not yet been posted; the<br />

attorney's issuance of checks which were the result of settle-<br />

ment checks paid out of the trust account when money from<br />

that account had aleady been earned as attorney's fees and<br />

withdrawn, leavig the account short of money with which to<br />

pay the settlement amount; and a clerical error in which a staf<br />

member wrote a check on the wrong account.<br />

ADMONITION<br />

On August 6, 1998, an attorney was admonished by the Chair of<br />

the Ethcs and Discipline Commttee of the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> for<br />

violation of Rules 1. 5 ( Safekeeping Propert) and 8.4 ( c)<br />

(Misconduct) of the Rules of Professional Conduct. The attor-<br />

ney was also ordered to attend the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> Ethics School.<br />

The discipline was based on a stipulation between the attorney<br />

and the Offce of Professional Conduct.<br />

The attorney wrote a check to opposing counsel with a cover<br />

letter stating that funds from the attorney's client had been<br />

deposited into the attorney's trust account. 1\o days later the<br />

attorney went to the bank to deposit the client's funds, and<br />

discovered that the check maied to opposing counsel was<br />

drawn on an account that the attorney had previously closed.<br />

The attorney faxed a latter to opposing counsel statig that the<br />

trust account on which the check had been drafed was closed<br />

and promptly sent a replacement check.<br />

ADMONITION<br />

On November 11, 1998, an attorney was admonished by the<br />

Chair of the Ethics and Disciplie Commttee of the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />

<strong>Bar</strong> for violation of Rules 1. (Dilgence) and 1.4 (Communica-<br />

tion) of the Rules of Professional Conduct.<br />

A client retained the attorney to defend him in a divorce action.<br />

The attorney did no work on the case, and a default judgment<br />

was entered against the client. The client repeatedly attempted<br />

to communicate with the attorney, but these attempts were<br />

usualy not successfu. The attorney faied to have the default<br />

judgment set aside.<br />

On October 8, 1998 a Screening Panel of the Ethcs and Disci-<br />

pline Commttee heard the matter and determined that an<br />

admonition was appropriate disciplie.<br />

ADMONITION<br />

On November 30, 1998, an attorney was admonished by the<br />

Chair of the Ethics and Discipline Commttee of the <strong>Utah</strong> <strong>State</strong><br />

<strong>Bar</strong>for violation of Rule 1.5 (Fees) of the Rules of Professional<br />

Conduct. The attorney was also ordered to imediately refund<br />

the unearned balance of the retaier fee to the client. The disci-<br />

plie was based on a stipulation between the attorney and the<br />

Offce of Professional Conduct.<br />

A couple retaned the attorney to represent them in various<br />

matters involving child support arrearages. Eventually, this<br />

work came to include representing the couple in a civi action.<br />

The attorney did not communicate to the clients in writig the<br />

basis or rate of the fee he would charge them for performig<br />

legal servces on their behal. The attorney no longer represents<br />

the clients.<br />

ADMONITION<br />

On December 8, 1998, an attorney was admonished by the<br />

Chair of the Ethics and Discipline Committee of the Uta <strong>State</strong><br />

<strong>Bar</strong> for violation of Rule 1.8 (Confct of Interest: Prohibited<br />

Transactions) of the Rules of Professional Conduct.<br />

The attorney was retaied to represent a client in a divorce<br />

proceedig. The client had substantial unsecured credit card<br />

debt and the only asset of any value was the marital home. At<br />

the tie of the proceeding, there was equity in the marital<br />

home. During the course of the proceedig, the attorney rued a<br />

notice of attorney's lien and appearance.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!