31.08.2013 Views

March 1999 Volune 12 No3 - Utah State Bar

March 1999 Volune 12 No3 - Utah State Bar

March 1999 Volune 12 No3 - Utah State Bar

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

6<br />

Commissioner's Report<br />

by Scott Daniels<br />

The Access to Justice Foundation has requested that the <strong>Utah</strong><br />

<strong>State</strong> <strong>Bar</strong> contribute $300,000 over the course of two years as<br />

seed money to help establish its activities. The <strong>Bar</strong> Commssion<br />

wi be considering this request over the next two months, and<br />

we need input from the members. In order to launch this dia-<br />

logue, I am submitting the following summary of the issues. It is<br />

greatly simplied, with the thought that an ounce of inaccuracy<br />

often saves a pound of explanation.<br />

mE ACCESS TO JUSTICE FOUNDATION<br />

In 1996 the Federal Government made deep cuts in the budget<br />

of the Legal Services Corporation. Legal Servces is the only<br />

statewide provider of legal servces to the poor. Most of these<br />

legal needs relate to securing food, shelter and clothing. In<br />

response to the crisis created by this funding cut, the <strong>Bar</strong> Com-<br />

mission petitioned the Supreme Court to create the Access to<br />

Justice Task Force. The Task Force concluded that the various<br />

agencies which provide legal servce to the poor have overlap-<br />

ping and sometimes confcting stadards. In addition to the<br />

various agencies, the <strong>Bar</strong> Pro Bono Project has a resource of<br />

1100 attorneys who have indicated a willngness to undertake<br />

legal work for the poor at no cost or at reduced cost.<br />

The problem comes in matching the legal needs with the pro<br />

bono lawyer and in admistering the cases. Someone has to<br />

check to establish that the person is eligible for help. Someone<br />

has to mainta lists of lawyers and their areas of competence<br />

and assign the cases to lawyers who have the abilty to handle<br />

them. Someone has to follow up and close the me when the<br />

time comes. The lawyers should also be provided with forms<br />

and training if necessar. Many times the lawyer does not have<br />

specifc expertise in the area of the assigned case and someone<br />

must be avaiable to assist and answer questions. Unfortunately,<br />

this canot be done well by volunteers . This requires paid<br />

employees with computers and other tools.<br />

The Task Force recommended that a Central Intake Unit be<br />

established which would serve Legal Servces, the Legal Aid<br />

Society, The Disabilty Law Center and other agencies which<br />

provide legal services to the poor, as well as the Pro Bono Pro-<br />

ject. This costs money.<br />

The Access to Justice Foundation has developed a long-range<br />

fundig plan, which wil rely on the contributions of founda-<br />

tions and individuals as well as appropriations from the <strong>State</strong><br />

Legislature. This year, The Access to Justice Foundation will be<br />

presenting a bil, which would provide $200,000 to fud the<br />

project. By the time you read this the Legislature wil have<br />

adjourned, and we wil know whether the bil passed success-<br />

fuy. At this moment, it appears doubtf that the Bil wil pass<br />

this year. If the <strong>Bar</strong> makes its contribution, as requested, the<br />

Access to Justice Foundation wil have a much better chance of<br />

success in next year's legislative session. A contribution from<br />

the <strong>Bar</strong> would also have a substantial effect in fundraising from<br />

foundations. Many foundations want to see success, at least on a<br />

smal scale before they are wig to make substatial grants.<br />

We are caught in a diemma; without a substantial funding<br />

contribution we have no results to show. A one-time contribu-<br />

tion from the bar could provide this jump-start which would<br />

make the Access to Justice Foundation viable. <strong>State</strong>d plainly: We<br />

have a historic opportunity to make a real impact on the prob-<br />

lem of lack of legal servces to the poor. Without the <strong>Bar</strong>'s initial.<br />

contribution, it is likely that the Access to Justice Project wi<br />

never get off the ground. With that contribution, it may succeed<br />

and it may faiL. If it does succeed, it wil be unlke anything<br />

currently avaiable in any state in the United <strong>State</strong>s of America<br />

and wil go a long way toward solving the problem of access to<br />

legal services for the poor.<br />

BAR FINANCES<br />

The <strong>Bar</strong> currently has a surplus reserve of<br />

about $500,000 (in addition to $300,000<br />

in contingency and replacement reserves<br />

which prudence would dictate should not<br />

be spent). This reserve could provide the<br />

money necessary to get this project going.<br />

I<br />

.<br />

:1<br />

i

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!