Modelling the accruals process and assessing unexpected accruals*
Modelling the accruals process and assessing unexpected accruals*
Modelling the accruals process and assessing unexpected accruals*
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
(i.e., <strong>the</strong> initiation of abnormal <strong>accruals</strong>). The difference between reported <strong>and</strong> underlying<br />
t u, t<br />
income ( CNI CNI ) is abnormal <strong>accruals</strong> if <strong>the</strong>re is no distortion in reported cash flow.<br />
The main implication from <strong>the</strong> abnormal <strong>accruals</strong> model is that abnormal <strong>accruals</strong> are driven by<br />
a change in accounting policy <strong>and</strong> forward income growth. Reported income will be distorted<br />
upward when income growth is positive <strong>and</strong> when <strong>the</strong>re is accounting aggression <strong>and</strong>/or an<br />
increase in <strong>the</strong> aggression level. Similarly, <strong>the</strong>re will be a negative distortion in reported income<br />
when income growth is positive <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong>re is conservatism <strong>and</strong>/or an increase in <strong>the</strong> conservatism<br />
level. If one restricts <strong>the</strong> proportion of future underlying income shifted to <strong>the</strong> current period to<br />
be <strong>the</strong> same as <strong>the</strong> proportion of current underlying income shifted to <strong>the</strong> past (i.e., mt1, t mt,<br />
t1),<br />
<strong>the</strong> distortion in reported income is totally driven by <strong>the</strong> growth in income. Under such a<br />
restriction where <strong>the</strong> level of accounting distortions are constant or permanent, <strong>the</strong> model yields<br />
<strong>the</strong> well documented effect that firms tend to understate income when permanent conservatism is<br />
associated with positive growth, with <strong>the</strong> opposite being true for permanent aggression. 13<br />
3.4 Combining normal <strong>and</strong> abnormal <strong>accruals</strong> models<br />
Total <strong>accruals</strong> consist of abnormal <strong>and</strong> normal components as follows<br />
t t<br />
TACC CNICFt u, t u, t t u, t u, t<br />
CNI CF CNI CNI CFt CF <br />
<br />
<br />
The items in <strong>the</strong> round brackets are <strong>the</strong> normal <strong>accruals</strong> while <strong>the</strong> items in <strong>the</strong> square brackets are<br />
<strong>the</strong> abnormal <strong>accruals</strong>. Abnormal <strong>accruals</strong> are simply <strong>the</strong> difference between reported <strong>and</strong><br />
underlying income if <strong>the</strong>re is no distortion in total reported cash flow (as is assumed throughout<br />
13 See Penman (2004) for instance; <strong>and</strong> for more detailed <strong>and</strong> comprehensive analyses on <strong>the</strong> impacts of accounting<br />
distortions on performance measures, please refer to Lai (2009).<br />
(9)<br />
20