Modelling the accruals process and assessing unexpected accruals*
Modelling the accruals process and assessing unexpected accruals*
Modelling the accruals process and assessing unexpected accruals*
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
If <strong>the</strong>re is no deviation in operating policies but <strong>the</strong> income of <strong>the</strong> benchmark firms is non-<br />
neutral (as in <strong>the</strong> third row of Table 4), <strong>the</strong> <strong>unexpected</strong> <strong>accruals</strong> will be contaminated by <strong>the</strong><br />
amount of this distortion. In particular, firm j‟s <strong>unexpected</strong> <strong>accruals</strong> capture <strong>the</strong> deviation in firm<br />
j‟s accounting policy from <strong>the</strong> benchmark firms, ra<strong>the</strong>r than <strong>the</strong> full amount of abnormal <strong>accruals</strong><br />
attributed to <strong>the</strong> firm‟s accounting policy. The classification of firm j as aggressive or<br />
conservative is not relative to an o<strong>the</strong>rwise unbiased accounting policy but it is relative to its<br />
benchmark firms (which can be its own time-series history or cross-sectional peers). If <strong>the</strong><br />
income distortion of <strong>the</strong> benchmark firms is negative (i.e., <strong>the</strong> benchmark firms are conservative),<br />
<strong>unexpected</strong> <strong>accruals</strong> will be biased upward relative to abnormal <strong>accruals</strong> (as in cell 6). Likewise,<br />
<strong>unexpected</strong> <strong>accruals</strong> will be biased downward when <strong>the</strong> income distortion of <strong>the</strong> benchmark<br />
firms is positive (as in cell 3). Moreover, <strong>the</strong> magnitude of <strong>the</strong>se upward or downward biases will<br />
equal <strong>the</strong> amount of <strong>the</strong> income distortion of <strong>the</strong> benchmark firms ( AbACC ).<br />
Finally, if <strong>the</strong>re is a deviation in operating policies for firm j <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> income of benchmark firms<br />
is distorted, <strong>the</strong> bias in firm j‟s <strong>unexpected</strong> <strong>accruals</strong> will be a function of <strong>the</strong>se two factors. A<br />
positive distortion in <strong>the</strong> benchmark firms‟ income associated with a negative deviation in<br />
operating policies between firm j <strong>and</strong> <strong>the</strong> benchmark firms will unambiguously bias <strong>unexpected</strong><br />
<strong>accruals</strong> downward (as in <strong>the</strong> case of cell 1 in Table 4). Likewise, a negative distortion in <strong>the</strong><br />
benchmark firms‟ income associated with a positive deviation in operating policies will bias<br />
<strong>unexpected</strong> <strong>accruals</strong> upward (as in <strong>the</strong> case of cell 9 in Table 4). The magnitudes of <strong>the</strong>se biases<br />
in firm j’s <strong>unexpected</strong> <strong>accruals</strong> will be equal to <strong>the</strong> amount of <strong>the</strong> income distortion of <strong>the</strong><br />
benchmark firms plus <strong>the</strong> amount of <strong>the</strong> deviation in firm j‟s operating policies.<br />
27