05.09.2013 Views

LawPavilion Electronic Law ...

LawPavilion Electronic Law ...

LawPavilion Electronic Law ...

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

NICON Act 1969 and 1990 that regulates the<br />

contract relationship between the appellant and the<br />

respondent now NICON Insurance PLC, registered<br />

under the Companies and Allied Matters Decree<br />

1990.<br />

2. Whether or not pre-action Notice is applicable to<br />

the specific contract of service between the<br />

appellant and the respondent.<br />

3. Whether or not the respondent, after receiving<br />

service of the plaintiff/appellant's writ of Summons<br />

on 30/5/96, after filing an unconditional<br />

memorandum of appearance dated 5/6/96, after<br />

filing first Motion for preliminary objection dated<br />

20/6/ 96, withdrawn same on 3/12/97, after taking<br />

fresh steps before filing the second Motion for<br />

preliminary objection dated 15/7/99, that was,<br />

after more than three years of the receipt of the<br />

Writ of Summons, had waived its right to pre-action<br />

Notice.<br />

On his part, learned counsel for the respondent<br />

formulated two issues for determination, which are:<br />

1. Whether the Court of Appeal was wrong in<br />

holding that NICON Act governed the respondent<br />

and that failure by the appellant to give the<br />

requisite pre-action notice prevented the trial court<br />

from exercising jurisdiction in the instant case.<br />

2. Whether having regard to the facts of the case,<br />

the respondent can be said to have waived his right<br />

to pre-action notice.<br />

The reason why the learned trial judge struck out

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!