BYRON'S LETTERS TO DOUGLAS KINNAIRD ... - Get a Free Blog
BYRON'S LETTERS TO DOUGLAS KINNAIRD ... - Get a Free Blog
BYRON'S LETTERS TO DOUGLAS KINNAIRD ... - Get a Free Blog
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
[To, The Honorable Douglas Kinnaird / Messrs Ransom & C o . Bankers. / Pall Mall. / London. /<br />
Angleterre. // Inghilterra.]<br />
Pisa. April 9 th . 1822<br />
My dear Douglas /<br />
I hear that M r . C. Butler (a lawyer I presume) says that an act of parliament will be<br />
necessary to sanction the name of Noel. I hope you have good advice thereupon that it may be done if<br />
requisite without loss of time. – – –<br />
By Thursday’s post I addressed to you a packet containing v[Ms. tear: “arious”] documents upon an<br />
affair which occurred here not long ago. – –<br />
At your leisure acknowledge the same and believe me<br />
y rs . ever & truly<br />
Noel Byron<br />
P.S.<br />
Thank Sir Francis<br />
for his letter which<br />
I will acknowledge in<br />
a post or two. – In the mean time why don’t you get on? with the arbitration?<br />
Byron to Douglas Kinnaird, from Pisa, April 13th 1822:<br />
(Source: text from NLS Ms.43453; not in 1922 II; BLJ IX 141)<br />
13<br />
Pisa. April 13 th . 1822.<br />
My dear Douglas /<br />
“Milk diet! and not insurable!” – it is to be presumed then that there will be more<br />
Milk than Honey (and Gall than either) from this new land of Canaan. – There are two questions which<br />
I would ask which will show you how much I know of my own affairs. – The one is – if the remaining<br />
ten thousand pounds of Lady B’s original portion – comes to me – in case of her demise – or to whom?<br />
– or, the whole – or a part only? – The other is – whether there being a daughter only – a part of<br />
the settlement (of my money) does not become released in case of her decease previous to mine. – – I<br />
ask this – as essential to meet the debts – in case of her not surviving me. – I see that there is but very<br />
1:2<br />
little to hope from that quarter (the Noel business) and I never expected that any good could come from<br />
a party – which seems engendered for my embarrassment in character – as well as fortune. – – –<br />
I have since your letter become indifferent to what the trustees may decide – as I merely looked to the<br />
insurance for any probability of advantage – in the liquidation of the remaining debts. – –<br />
It would be a foolish thing in me to marry again – & yet I would not answer for my not repeating such<br />
a folly – if a widower. – The Woman is no friend of mine – yet I should be sorry for her own sake – &<br />
for the Child’s that she should go down to the Grave with a heart colder than her dust will ever be. – –<br />
– – –<br />
But enough of this subject. – – – –<br />
1:3<br />
M r Murray has not sent to me any defence – of “Cain” – but some attacks upon it. –<br />
I sent you last week packets of an affair that occurred here – of which you will have heard enough by<br />
this time. – I enclose you three more letters on the subject – which will enable you to judge still further<br />
for yourself. – – I trust you are getting well<br />
I am ever yours<br />
N. B.<br />
Byron to Douglas Kinnaird, from Pisa, April 18th 1822:<br />
(Source: text from NLS Ms.43453; 1922 II 221-3; BLJ IX 144-5)<br />
[To, The Hon ble Douglas Kinnaird / Messrs Ransom & C o . Bankers. / Pall Mall. / London. / Angleterre.<br />
// Inghilterra.]<br />
Pisa. April 18 th . 1822<br />
My dear Douglas /<br />
The decision is quite satisfactory to me. – It would have been no less so had Sir<br />
Francis decided that she was to have all – or nothing at all. –