06.09.2013 Views

BYRON'S LETTERS TO DOUGLAS KINNAIRD ... - Get a Free Blog

BYRON'S LETTERS TO DOUGLAS KINNAIRD ... - Get a Free Blog

BYRON'S LETTERS TO DOUGLAS KINNAIRD ... - Get a Free Blog

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

76<br />

[To The Honorable / Douglas Kinnaird. / Messrs Ransom & Co. Bankers. / Pall Mall. / London. /<br />

Angleterre. // Inghilterra.]<br />

Byron denies that he is sabotaging The Liberal.<br />

Genoa. March 10 th . 1823.<br />

My dear Douglas /<br />

Enclosed is the 14 th . Canto of D.J. – the thirteenth was sent a few days ago – also –<br />

the Age of Bronze (proof to be compared carefully with the M.S.S. by the publisher) – and a poem in 4<br />

Cantos called the Island – this makes the fourth packet. – Please to acknowledge arrivals of the same. –<br />

M r . J. H. writes to his brother that you desired him to stop the L. – You forget that we have no power to<br />

stop the publication of a work over which we have no control – there is the Pulci translation for his<br />

next number if he pleases. – The things I have sent to you – are not to be inserted in the Liberal – but it<br />

does not follow – that that Journal is to cease – and L. H. says that it will do him great harm if that<br />

journal stops. – If there must be a sacrifice – I would rather risk myself than other people. – As to the<br />

D.J. you have now nine Cantos in hand – I sent the proofs of the last six; – I care nothing for outcry & c .<br />

– they shall be published and that speedily if I were to print them myself. y rs . ever N. B.<br />

1:2<br />

P.S. – I know no reason for further delay of the publication of the 6 th . 7 th . and 8 th . {Cantos} and the<br />

others need only wait till I can revise them. – Never mind me – and do not allow yourself to be swayed<br />

by any temporary oppression – if I don’t – why should you? –<br />

Anything from Deardon? it is very strange that you never did answer whether you received my letter<br />

and his sent on the 24 th . January 1823. – I have asked twenty times. – It was ensured. –<br />

Byron to Douglas Kinnaird, from Genoa, March 20th 1823:<br />

(Source: text from NLS Ms.43454; not in 1922 II; BLJ X 126-7)<br />

[To The Honorable / Douglas Kinnaird. / Messrs Ransom & Co. Bankers. / Pall Mall. / London. /<br />

Angleterre // Inghilterra]<br />

Genoa. March 20 th . 1823.<br />

My dear Douglas /<br />

Hobhouse writes that you are in Leicestershire 140 – hunting I presume – I pray you to<br />

have a reverend care of your invaluable neck – and to make the present leap year in your accidents –<br />

for I think that one has annually occurred to you for the two last. – You have now kept me in warm<br />

water – by not acknowledging the receipt of Deardon’s letter – inclosed to you with my own answer –<br />

and tending to advance the negociation – Crabtree who was to go in February does not appear to have<br />

been – the suit advances – and lo – another lawyer’s bill – and the uncertainty of whether I am to make<br />

a not very agreeable journey or not. – Hobhouse is very earnest that we should close with Hanson – I<br />

am sure he cannot be more than I am – by the way – why was I not summoned by either party on the<br />

Portsmouth case? – I would and<br />

1:2<br />

still will – if required – give what I know on the subject in evidence. – In my answer to Hobhouse – I<br />

have stated what he will probably show you. –<br />

You will – or should have received various packets of M.S.S. – a proof of the Age of Bronze –<br />

{another} poem M.S.S. in four cantos – and the 13 th . and 14 th . of D. J. – also a Scotch deed for 133<br />

pounds & c . signed in order to receive the money – and forwarded by the Consul’s Courier some time<br />

ago. – I do not want you to write letters beyond simple acknowledgements of packets received. – – I<br />

have already stated – that I am determined to publish “Coute qui coute” – neither public nor private<br />

shall alter my course in what I think right on such subjects. – As to more Childe Harolds – and Naples<br />

– it was a mere hypothetical case – which now that<br />

1:3<br />

Murray has thought proper to hint it about – I would not write – at all – and least of all for such as him.<br />

– He went about saying that “perhaps he & c . & c . – does the fellow think that he is or ever will be on the<br />

same terms with me as formerly? – I have been unwell – & better – but relapsed after dining with M r .<br />

140: H. to B., March 2nd 1823: I shall speak to Kinnaird about it the moment he comes back from Leicestershire<br />

... this is the letter in which H. relates the horrors of the Portsmouth marriage.

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!