23.10.2012 Views

Technology Status of Hydrogen Road Vehicles

Technology Status of Hydrogen Road Vehicles

Technology Status of Hydrogen Road Vehicles

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

Fischer and Eichert (1995) provide an updated critical review <strong>of</strong> the data (mostly experimental) that affect the<br />

behavior <strong>of</strong> hydrogen in situations relevant to safety. Though general, this review repeatedly illustrates how<br />

the behavior can be greatly affected by the initial and boundary conditions, i.e., the specifics <strong>of</strong> each accident.<br />

Fischer et al. (1996) state that today modeling and simulation show good agreement with a variety <strong>of</strong> fast<br />

combustion phenomena observed in experiments. One useful result would be the design <strong>of</strong> improved<br />

detonation arrester geometries. Sanai (1996) proposes an accident analysis algorithm, based on available<br />

experimental data and computer simulation <strong>of</strong> explosion accidents, to quickly calculate the response <strong>of</strong> humans<br />

and structures to such accidents. Maas (1996) handles phenomena such as auto ignition, induced ignition,<br />

minimum ignition energy, the transition from deflagration to detonation, and catalytic combustion, and<br />

concludes that the rapid improvements in numerical simulation and computing power will soon allow good<br />

simulation <strong>of</strong> practical combustion systems with complex geometry. Kratzel (1996) also models the processes<br />

leading to detonation, especially in complex geometries, among the most challenging to hydrogen safety.<br />

Table 3 is a selection <strong>of</strong> parameters from Fischer and Eichert (1995) and Kalyanam and Moore (1987).<br />

Table 3. Safety-Related Properties <strong>of</strong> <strong>Hydrogen</strong> and Conventional Fuels<br />

Property Unit H 2 CH 4 Gasoline Diesel<br />

Gas density g/l NTP 0.08 0.65 4.4 -<br />

Lower heating value kWs/g 120 50 44 43<br />

Stoichiometric composition in air vol. % 29.5 9.48 1.75 -<br />

Buoyant velocity in air m/s >1-0 >1-6 nonbuoyant nonbuoyant<br />

Self-ignition temperature °C 585 540 230-470 251<br />

Flame temperature in air °C 2045 1875 2200<br />

Ignition limits in air vol. % 4-75 5-15 1->7 7<br />

Minimum ignition energy mWs 0.02 0.29 0.24 -<br />

Flame speed in air cm/s -295 -41 -40 -<br />

Flame thermal radiation % 17-25 23-33 30-42 -<br />

Maximum safe gap in air mm 0.08 1.2 0.7 -<br />

Detonation limits in air vol. % 18-59 >6->13 >1->3<br />

Detonation velocity in air km/s -1.8 -1.5 -1.6 -<br />

Theoretical explosive yield per m 3 kg TNT 2.02 7.03 44.22 -<br />

It is not advisable to rate the above properties according to their importance to safety. Many authors focus<br />

on the ease <strong>of</strong> ignition (limits and minimum energy for ignition), the speed <strong>of</strong> combustion, the potential for<br />

detonation, and so on, as <strong>of</strong> particular concern. But closer examination can easily re-dimension the apparent<br />

gravity <strong>of</strong> these factors:<br />

! The lower ignition limit guides the evolution <strong>of</strong> most fires, and there is little difference between the<br />

various fuels; in fact, propane has the lowest limit.<br />

26

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!