23.10.2012 Views

Technology Status of Hydrogen Road Vehicles

Technology Status of Hydrogen Road Vehicles

Technology Status of Hydrogen Road Vehicles

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

Create successful ePaper yourself

Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.

! the best cases however, hydrogen vehicles approach competitiveness, since middle term gasoline prices<br />

<strong>of</strong> $0.40 per liter are not unimaginable, even in the U.S.; the hydride case <strong>of</strong> better-than-free gasoline<br />

suffers from the assumed 210 km range, and from much less power than with gasoline;<br />

! the great range in breakeven prices is attributable primarily to the uncertain cost-per-km <strong>of</strong> hydrogen fuel<br />

in the middle term, due to uncertain price for solar electricity...;<br />

! at lower interest rates, and higher baseline vehicle costs, hydrogen vehicles ...may be significantly more<br />

competitive than represented here;<br />

9. Vehicle comparisons<br />

....if a safe method <strong>of</strong> disposing <strong>of</strong> vents from LH 2 tanks is developed, hydride vehicles will lose most <strong>of</strong> their<br />

advantage.......since most <strong>of</strong> the breakeven gasoline prices for hydride and LH 2 vehicles are similar.<br />

.....10-15 years research on hydrides has failed to produce the ideal candidate, which reinforces the notion that<br />

more serious attention be given to LH 2 vehicles....<br />

....if a compressed gas H 2 (he goes for 690 bar) vehicle could provide the range <strong>of</strong> an LH 2 vehicle at the same<br />

cost, it could be the preferred hydrogen storage method.<br />

.....costs aside, hydride vehicles would be inferior to gasoline vehicles in range, bulky storage, and<br />

performance...while LH 2 vehicles have the boil<strong>of</strong>f problem, and bulkier storage than gasoline vehicles<br />

10. Areas for further research<br />

Concerning fuel storage, three areas are emphasized for progress: hydrides for higher vehicle range and<br />

performance; “clever” repackaging <strong>of</strong> components to <strong>of</strong>fset the inevitable loss <strong>of</strong> trunk space to bulky storage;<br />

reliable, low-cost boil<strong>of</strong>f control devices for LH 2 vehicles.<br />

The possibility <strong>of</strong> small-scale H 2 liquefiers for refueling stations should be investigated.....<br />

Concerning safety, perhaps the most important research issue is to determine under what conditions hydrogen<br />

can be shipped in the existing natural gas network.<br />

Concerning performance and environmental impacts, ....it would be worthwhile to investigate the use <strong>of</strong> late<br />

injection <strong>of</strong> high pressure gaseous H 2 on volumetric density, and also on NO x with lean operation (same for<br />

LH 2).<br />

Concerning cost, the objective is defined as the best-case described in the paper, because in any other scenario<br />

hydrogen vehicles are not socially cost-effective, and in the worst cases they are extraordinarily expensive.<br />

If however, a relatively high value is placed on avoiding greenhouse warming and reducing dependence on<br />

an insecure and diminishing resource, this would change.<br />

In conclusion, this paper does not support the notion common among policy makers that hydrogen vehicles<br />

are strictly an exotic, distant-future possibility.....With a strong R&D effort, normal technological progress,<br />

and the expected reduction in the price <strong>of</strong> solar electricity, hydrogen vehicles could be (socially) costcompetitive<br />

within 30 years or less.<br />

53

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!