14.09.2013 Views

The Edi ' - The Leveson Inquiry

The Edi ' - The Leveson Inquiry

The Edi ' - The Leveson Inquiry

SHOW MORE
SHOW LESS

You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles

YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.

For Distribution to CPs<br />

tn a similar case, a widow complained about an evening<br />

newspaper’s coverage after her husband was killed in a boat<br />

disastei~ One story, headlined Sheltered Lives And Lost Dreams,<br />

projected the feelings of her two-year-old son. Another- using<br />

information and e picture of mother and son supplied by the<br />

g rendparents -- revealed against her expressed wishes that she had<br />

since given birth to a daughter, <strong>The</strong> PCC, while sympathising with the<br />

widow’s distress, felt the newspaper’s attempts to illustrate the<br />

human consequences of tragedy were not inherently insensitive.<br />

Although the widow had not wanted publcity for the bidh of her baby<br />

there were competing rights of others to speak to the media, and for<br />

the public to receive information. :Gr~Ov v F:~,eh/eq Cr:u:~e~ H:~/ifa~<br />

It also ruled that a newspaper that broke the news to neighbours<br />

of the death of a toddler through meningitis did not breach the Code.<br />

It was an important matter of public health and legitimate for a paper<br />

to seek comment from local people who ware not relalves of the<br />

child Meudev Derby Events9 7efeo~,ofL- Re-~or~ 42. 1g~7<br />

Insensi~ive or unnecessary detail {See msm ;;e/~ortg:~ Suicide<br />

:,eto~ : A magazine thai. stagec a mock-up of a murder scene end<br />

Dublshed the picture -- with a headshot of the victim -- on the<br />

anniversary of the death trampled through both the ’sensitivity’ and<br />

accuracy rules, it was not made clear that the picture of a female<br />

body wrapped in bin liners, which caused much distress, was<br />

actualy a reconstruction, based on the court reports of the murder.<br />

<strong>The</strong> PCC condemned the magazine’s "cavalier approach"<br />

Breaking the news: <strong>The</strong> Commission has upheld a newspaper’s aggravated by the timing of publication, which had shown a total<br />

right to publish a story as soon as the death is confirmed, but not disregard for the victim’s family "/4 man v Chat ,:neg~zk}a: Rer~ar~<br />

before. <strong>The</strong> PCC sees it as no part of the journalist’s rote to inform 7& 200 ~]<br />

close relatives or friends of fhe deefh<br />

A woman claimed a local newspaper’s story about her brother’s<br />

A somplaint from a mother who read about her daughter’s death death following a collapse at home -- headlined Starving Pet Starts<br />

-- ahead of positive identification -- in a story headlined Body-in- To Devour Pensioner -- was distressing and sensationalist. <strong>The</strong><br />

Bath Probe was upheld. <strong>The</strong> mother had still been hoping it was not PCC agreed, rejecting the editor’s claim that the story was handled<br />

her daughter. <strong>The</strong> Commission said the newspaper shoule have sympathetically f~r~m~n Rhonod~ Leader. ~e~. oM 65 2004~. It<br />

checked that the family knew before publishlng ~C;~w’ ~ ~/~:cbea~÷ ruled that the story was not sufficiently sensitive, bearing in mind<br />

~!/~ "~fe9 Ire ’w_ Re~

Hooray! Your file is uploaded and ready to be published.

Saved successfully!

Ooh no, something went wrong!