The Edi ' - The Leveson Inquiry
The Edi ' - The Leveson Inquiry
The Edi ' - The Leveson Inquiry
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
For Distribution to CPs<br />
interfered with the shopkeeper’s ability to conduct his arguments<br />
freely in public -- and could have been incompatible with his rights<br />
Wee it reasonable to believe ~hat publication Or journalistic aativiLy to free express on. ~Corr,~wafi Ceur~ ~ Cou~zf~ ~ the P~cke~<br />
v.meld have served the public intwist’t: <strong>The</strong> Pcc would require a full Fstmou~n: Re~or 7#, 2007J<br />
explanation showing that the grounds Were genuine and sound in the<br />
circumstances. Ceutd the information have been obtained by ether means? A<br />
if ctandestine methods, subterfuge, he.secant or payments t0 key test of the validity of the public interest defence is whether the<br />
Criminals or witnesses are involved, could the in~rmati0h have been information could have been obtained without intrusion or other<br />
obtained by ethermeans? breach, This applies particularly in cases involving clandestine<br />
is ~he i~formstioe in the p~bli¢ dome e, er ksly te be¢0ma s0? listening devices, subterfuge, harassment, or payments to witnesses<br />
if children ere invotved, is the public interest in peblication or criminals.<br />
exceptional?<br />
caution is needed when publishing images of people receMng<br />
~Y ~:~L~ G~<br />
~/~ v Manchester E~en;r~g r,~;w~ R~:~; 43 ~8<br />
medical treatment, even in public places ~cw~ v ~//,~:~.,~i~ Jeurh~ d~P~o~t 46 !~9 ~<br />
However, the newspaper’s speedy action in taking down the ,~ ~ womm~ v [,~ ~ t,ews :~cr~smoutb (Re~o~1 6~ 20 ~<br />
material and ape og s rig, was a proportionate remedy. IY~.~H~a~~ v ~ ~ c v Reedri ~ ~(veni~-io Po~ ~/t~e~;ort 37 ~7~<br />
Upholding freedom of sx:pression: Council officers using a 15year-o~a<br />
soy in an undercover "sting’ operation to curb alcohol sales<br />
to underage customers complained when an angry shopkeeper’s<br />
CCTV image of him appeared in a local paper. <strong>The</strong>y claimed this<br />
infringed his privacy and rights as a child under the Code. But the<br />
shopkeeper, whose staff sold the soy alcohol, wanted to<br />
demonstrate publicly that he looked at least 18<br />
<strong>The</strong> PCC rejected the complaint. It said that the boy’s welfare<br />
wasn’t thvo~ved and the story of possible entrapment rested entirely<br />
on his phys~cel appearance.<br />
To have found that the picture breached the Code would have<br />
cs~e~ ~ Fhe 8~t free ~52 2~00<br />
_ r~,~, ~ ~e~ end bytes}s, B~i’ se~;a~isst or" ~er}o~t 43. !9g~<br />
Earle £)~}/ty 7efe£;aph Re,or t~/ @gq<br />
Newspaper a~ ~ag~i~e P~b|~shi~g In the UK<br />
<strong>Edi</strong>tors’ Code of Practice 2~7<br />
<strong>The</strong> Press Complaints Commission is charged with enforctn 9 the following Code of Prac#ce which was framed<br />
by the newspaper and periodical industry and was ratified by the PCC on 13 June 2007 to include changes which<br />
took effect from I August 2007.<br />
AH members of the press have a duty te maintain the interference with freedom of e~preesion or prevents<br />
highest professional standards. <strong>The</strong> Cede, which publication in the public interest.<br />
includes this :,;ee~c*~ and the pubtic interest<br />
eEeeptione below, sets the benchmark for those ethicet<br />
standards, protecting beth the rights of the individae~<br />
and the public’a right to know. Bt is the cornerstone of<br />
the system of self-regu~ation to which the indestry has<br />
made s binding commitment,<br />
it is essential that an agreed code be henoered ~et only<br />
to the letter bet in ~he ful! spirit. ~t sheatd not be<br />
interpreted so narrowly as to compromise its<br />
commitment te respect the rights of the individual, nor<br />
so broadly that it constitutes an ennecessary<br />
it is the responsibility of editors and publishers te apply<br />
the Coda to editorial materiel in beth printed and online<br />
versions of publications. <strong>The</strong>y should take care te<br />
ensure it is observed rigorously by all editorial staff<br />
and eztsrnal contributors, including non-journalists, in<br />
p tinted and online versions of publications.<br />
<strong>Edi</strong>tors should so-operats swiftly with the PCC in the<br />
resoietlon of co~plaints. Any peblicatian judged te<br />
have breached the Code mast print the edjudicatio~ in<br />
full and with due prominence, including headline<br />
reference to the PCC.<br />
MOD100036659<br />
84