The Edi ' - The Leveson Inquiry
The Edi ' - The Leveson Inquiry
The Edi ' - The Leveson Inquiry
Create successful ePaper yourself
Turn your PDF publications into a flip-book with our unique Google optimized e-Paper software.
For Distribution to CPs<br />
~ onsideration of the public interest, a core themeth~ough much <strong>The</strong> Code Committee has been quick to react, with the<br />
of the Code, is seldom more important than here. <strong>The</strong>re is often introduction of new measures to prevent abuse. <strong>The</strong>y include wide<br />
a fine line to be drawn at the point where genuine investigative ranging curbs on intrusive activity unless it can be demonstrated to<br />
journalism ceases and intrusive reporting begins. <strong>The</strong> public interest be in the wider public interest. <strong>The</strong>y cover:<br />
iscrucialinjudgingwhethertheendsjustifythemeansanddeciding ~ Hacking ~ i i into digitally ~ i - held private i i mformatfon ~ ;<br />
whether undercover was merely underhand.<br />
~ <strong>The</strong> use of hidden cameras;<br />
....<br />
<strong>The</strong> speed of technological renovation puts this area constantly<br />
into the public spotlight, with concerns over the misuse of private<br />
~ Interception of mobile phones<br />
’<br />
tex~ messages and emails"<br />
’<br />
Bugging ar electronic eavesdropping"<br />
data and the use oT<br />
....<br />
inquiry agents or others to circumvent the Code<br />
<strong>The</strong> use of agents or intermediaries to obtain matedal intended<br />
ano ERe la~<br />
for publication.<br />
Additional y, the PCC and the newspaper and magazine industry<br />
have launched their own initiatives to ensure that both the Code and<br />
the law -- such as the Data Protection Act and the Regulation of<br />
Investigatory Powers Act -- are properfy observed fSee £~r;efin~L~<br />
undercover reDortera filmed guests at a orivate party for people<br />
working on the "IV soap Emmerdale was upheld after the PCC<br />
roundly rejected the newspaper’s exnlanatton that the ,aurnalista<br />
might have discovered people benavmg in a way which would have<br />
justified eublication )n the oublic interest. That would have given<br />
newsoaoers carte blanche to intrude on any private gathering of<br />
high profile figuras, said the Commiseion. ~/~’/~ v fvews of !the W~ "~<br />
~teDo,,~ 53 200f<br />
Seeking or ~inding? <strong>The</strong> Code’s rules apply to pre-publicetion news<br />
gathering as much as to publication iteett It would be a breecl"<br />
simply to seek malaria! that was against the Code, or to engage in<br />
misrepresentation or subterfuge -- even if nothing was published<br />
.......................................................<br />
legitimate public interest woutd be served<br />
However, there is a distinction to be made between information<br />
which a newspaper or magazine has sought or obtained itself, or<br />
has commissioned, and that which comes unsolicited via a leak<br />
or from a whisttebtewer, perhaps. <strong>The</strong> newspaper might not know<br />
the 0rovenance of documents obtained in this way but could stdl be net DnVata life= It might have been very different.