Internationella Engelska Gymnasiet Södermalm Math ... - IEGSmath
Internationella Engelska Gymnasiet Södermalm Math ... - IEGSmath
Internationella Engelska Gymnasiet Södermalm Math ... - IEGSmath
You also want an ePaper? Increase the reach of your titles
YUMPU automatically turns print PDFs into web optimized ePapers that Google loves.
1. Course Grading<br />
Our department strives to ensure that all students are graded in a holistic, fair and equal manner. Our department<br />
assessment procedures are based based on Skolverket’s Curriculum for the Upper Secondary School<br />
[Tur13] and Upper Secondary School 2011 [Sko12].<br />
Before setting a final course grade, the teacher will make use of all available information on a student’s knowledge<br />
in relation to the national knowledge requirements of the course 1 , account for such knowledge that the<br />
student has acquired outside the course and comprehensively evaluate each student knowledge outside the<br />
national knowledge requirements.<br />
We have developed a means of assessing students on the knowledge requirements locally, which aims to<br />
1. be easy for students, parents, and teachers to understand,<br />
2. align our local results with the national test results and<br />
3. collect flexible, consistent and transparent results for each course.<br />
1.1 How final grades are awarded<br />
Ultimately, a decision needs to be taken by the teacher when setting a student’s final course grade, which<br />
needs to be set based on evidence provided by summative assessment and at the same time be done in a<br />
holistic context.<br />
Our grading system is a framework for collecting evidence of each student’s attainment of knowledge requirements<br />
over the course’s core content. It’s meant to give teachers of the same course a common overview of<br />
each student’s summative assessment performance in addition to a calculated suggested final course grade.<br />
A teacher can choose to override the suggested course grade if there are grounds to justify the decision.<br />
1.1.1 Distribution of summative assessments<br />
There are four major summative assessments for each GY2011 course and each contributing approximately<br />
25% towards the students suggested final grade. The distribution of weight for each summative assessment<br />
has been chosen to emphasise equality of assessment throughout the course.<br />
• National test common for all students taking<br />
the same course and helps to provide calibration<br />
at the national level.<br />
• Test 1 and Test 2 designed by all teachers<br />
teaching the course concurrently, common for<br />
all students taking the same course and helps<br />
to provide calibration at the local level.<br />
• In Class the number and type of assessment<br />
will vary from teacher to to teacher. Allows the<br />
teacher to use alternative forms of summative<br />
assessment that reflect either the interest of the<br />
teacher or the students of the group.<br />
1 including the student’s national test result<br />
4